颈肌张力障碍的情绪症状:与运动症状和生活质量的关系

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shameer Rafee , Mahmood Al-Hinai , Gillian Douglas , Ihedinachi Ndukwe , Michael Hutchinson
{"title":"颈肌张力障碍的情绪症状:与运动症状和生活质量的关系","authors":"Shameer Rafee ,&nbsp;Mahmood Al-Hinai ,&nbsp;Gillian Douglas ,&nbsp;Ihedinachi Ndukwe ,&nbsp;Michael Hutchinson","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2023.100186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cervical dystonia (CD) has a high prevalence of anxiety and depression. The relationship between motor severity, mood symptoms and QoL is unclear and how to adequately assess these is also unknown. Instruments like the BAI, BDI and HADS are often used but items within these relating to somatic symptoms might influence the results.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia (CD) were included. The BAI, BDI, HADS, CIDP58 and TWSTRS2- severity score were used for assessment of motor, mood and QoL symptoms. Pearson’s correlations between motor and non-motor symptom scores were assessed. The psychometric properties of the psychiatric tools were measured and principal component analysis performed after identifying items that could correspond to somatic symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>201 participants were included. 42% of participants had either significant depression or anxiety symptoms or both when measured by BAI and BDI and 51% of patients met criteria on HADS. HADS-A and HADS-D, BAI and BDI were poorly correlated with TWSTRS2-S. The HADS-A and HADS-D both showed strong correlation with the sleep subdomain of CDIP58. Psychometric and principal component analysis on 149/201 participants did not reveal factor loadings consistent with the a priori somatic groupings. However mean scores were higher for somatic items.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A good score on the CDIP58, a commonly used tool, does not indicate mild disease severity or minimal mood symptoms. Minimal motor symptoms, similarly, also does not imply a positive QoL. Clinicians should be mindful on ideal methods for performing a holistic assessment of CD patients. This likely warrants a combination of motor, QoL and mood assessment tools.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898436/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mood symptoms in cervical dystonia: Relationship with motor symptoms and quality of life\",\"authors\":\"Shameer Rafee ,&nbsp;Mahmood Al-Hinai ,&nbsp;Gillian Douglas ,&nbsp;Ihedinachi Ndukwe ,&nbsp;Michael Hutchinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prdoa.2023.100186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cervical dystonia (CD) has a high prevalence of anxiety and depression. The relationship between motor severity, mood symptoms and QoL is unclear and how to adequately assess these is also unknown. Instruments like the BAI, BDI and HADS are often used but items within these relating to somatic symptoms might influence the results.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia (CD) were included. The BAI, BDI, HADS, CIDP58 and TWSTRS2- severity score were used for assessment of motor, mood and QoL symptoms. Pearson’s correlations between motor and non-motor symptom scores were assessed. The psychometric properties of the psychiatric tools were measured and principal component analysis performed after identifying items that could correspond to somatic symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>201 participants were included. 42% of participants had either significant depression or anxiety symptoms or both when measured by BAI and BDI and 51% of patients met criteria on HADS. HADS-A and HADS-D, BAI and BDI were poorly correlated with TWSTRS2-S. The HADS-A and HADS-D both showed strong correlation with the sleep subdomain of CDIP58. Psychometric and principal component analysis on 149/201 participants did not reveal factor loadings consistent with the a priori somatic groupings. However mean scores were higher for somatic items.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A good score on the CDIP58, a commonly used tool, does not indicate mild disease severity or minimal mood symptoms. Minimal motor symptoms, similarly, also does not imply a positive QoL. Clinicians should be mindful on ideal methods for performing a holistic assessment of CD patients. This likely warrants a combination of motor, QoL and mood assessment tools.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898436/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259011252300004X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259011252300004X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景颈性肌张力障碍(CD)具有较高的焦虑和抑郁患病率。运动严重程度、情绪症状和生活质量之间的关系尚不清楚,如何充分评估这些也不清楚。BAI、BDI和HADS等仪器经常使用,但其中与躯体症状有关的项目可能会影响结果。方法纳入特发性子宫颈肌张力障碍(CD)患者。BAI、BDI、HADS、CIDP58和TWSTRS2严重程度评分用于评估运动、情绪和生活质量症状。评估运动和非运动症状评分之间的Pearson相关性。在确定了可能与躯体症状相对应的项目后,测量了精神病学工具的心理测量特性,并进行了主成分分析。结果共纳入201名参与者。通过BAI和BDI测量,42%的参与者有显著的抑郁或焦虑症状,或两者兼有,51%的患者符合HADS标准。HADS-A和HADS-D、BAI和BDI与TWSTRS2-相关性较差。HADS-A和HADS-D均与CDIP58的睡眠亚结构域有很强的相关性。对149/201名参和者的心理测量和主成分分析并没有发现和先验躯体分组一致的因素负荷。然而,躯体项目的平均得分更高。结论CDIP58是一种常用的工具,其良好的评分并不表示疾病的轻度或轻微的情绪症状。同样,轻微的运动症状也不意味着积极的生活质量。临床医生应该注意对CD患者进行全面评估的理想方法。这可能需要结合运动、生活质量和情绪评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mood symptoms in cervical dystonia: Relationship with motor symptoms and quality of life

Background

Cervical dystonia (CD) has a high prevalence of anxiety and depression. The relationship between motor severity, mood symptoms and QoL is unclear and how to adequately assess these is also unknown. Instruments like the BAI, BDI and HADS are often used but items within these relating to somatic symptoms might influence the results.

Methods

Patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia (CD) were included. The BAI, BDI, HADS, CIDP58 and TWSTRS2- severity score were used for assessment of motor, mood and QoL symptoms. Pearson’s correlations between motor and non-motor symptom scores were assessed. The psychometric properties of the psychiatric tools were measured and principal component analysis performed after identifying items that could correspond to somatic symptoms.

Results

201 participants were included. 42% of participants had either significant depression or anxiety symptoms or both when measured by BAI and BDI and 51% of patients met criteria on HADS. HADS-A and HADS-D, BAI and BDI were poorly correlated with TWSTRS2-S. The HADS-A and HADS-D both showed strong correlation with the sleep subdomain of CDIP58. Psychometric and principal component analysis on 149/201 participants did not reveal factor loadings consistent with the a priori somatic groupings. However mean scores were higher for somatic items.

Conclusion

A good score on the CDIP58, a commonly used tool, does not indicate mild disease severity or minimal mood symptoms. Minimal motor symptoms, similarly, also does not imply a positive QoL. Clinicians should be mindful on ideal methods for performing a holistic assessment of CD patients. This likely warrants a combination of motor, QoL and mood assessment tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Parkinsonism  Related Disorders
Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
98 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信