严重烧伤患者肺结核的临床诊断与经验性治疗方案:观察与文献复习。

Chane Kulenkampff, Wayne G Kleintjes, Edwin P Kotzee, Hadyn Kankam
{"title":"严重烧伤患者肺结核的临床诊断与经验性治疗方案:观察与文献复习。","authors":"Chane Kulenkampff,&nbsp;Wayne G Kleintjes,&nbsp;Edwin P Kotzee,&nbsp;Hadyn Kankam","doi":"10.1177/20595131231175794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis is a prevalent concomitant infection and cause for mortality in burns patients in Sub-Saharan Africa. First line laboratory diagnostic studies for pulmonary tuberculosis are often negative in these patients and if relied on, result in high mortality. The purpose of this report is to share our experience with a novel protocol of empiric treatment of clinically suspected pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients with negative GeneXpert tests in a tertiary burns centre and to present a brief literature review on the topic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of all patients, who sustained thermal injury with an inhalation component, with negative GeneXpert tests who were treated empirically for pulmonary tuberculosis over a five-year period (2015-2020) was performed. Additionally, a literature search was performed on Medline (PubMed), Cochrane and Google Scholar databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the five-year period, 20 patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis and severe burns requiring ventilation were managed according to the protocol and all survived to discharge. The literature search identified six factors that explain the consequence of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients and provide a hypothesis for the negative laboratory studies encountered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was an improved outcome for patients with the clinical diagnosis of reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis when they were started on empirical pulmonary tuberculosis treatment. There are several potential mechanisms that can contribute to reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis in susceptible severely burned patients. The GeneXpert test should not be relied upon in these patients for a diagnosis, but rather all other clinical evidence should inform management.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>From the current literature evidence most patients who have severe burns complicated by a secondary infection known as pulmonary (lung) tuberculosis, die as a result. The purpose of this report is to share our experience with treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis during a five-year period, from 2015 to 2020, in a specialized adult tertiary burn center. Severely burned patients who were suspected of having pulmonary tuberculosis and received treatment despite having negative laboratory tests for pulmonary tuberculosis, had a better survival rate than expected. A brief literature review on the topic of pulmonary tuberculosis and severe burns was done to investigate causes for reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis and negative laboratory studies in these patients.The literature search identified the following factors that can potentially affect the reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: decreased immune system; secondary infections; low blood albumin(protein) levels; decreased clearance of bacteria from the airways, the development of pulmonary tuberculosis biofilms (capsules that protect the bacteria from chemicals and antibiotics) and the role of a fat molecule called phosphatidylinositol mannoside in pulmonary tuberculosis.In conclusion, the pulmonary tuberculosis test should not be relied upon in these patients, but rather all the clinical evidence such X-ray changes in association with difficulty to wean the patient off the ventilator should be used to inform treatment choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21495,"journal":{"name":"Scars, burns & healing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a3/0b/10.1177_20595131231175794.PMC10433730.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protocol for clinical diagnosis and empiric treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: observations and literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Chane Kulenkampff,&nbsp;Wayne G Kleintjes,&nbsp;Edwin P Kotzee,&nbsp;Hadyn Kankam\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20595131231175794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis is a prevalent concomitant infection and cause for mortality in burns patients in Sub-Saharan Africa. First line laboratory diagnostic studies for pulmonary tuberculosis are often negative in these patients and if relied on, result in high mortality. The purpose of this report is to share our experience with a novel protocol of empiric treatment of clinically suspected pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients with negative GeneXpert tests in a tertiary burns centre and to present a brief literature review on the topic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of all patients, who sustained thermal injury with an inhalation component, with negative GeneXpert tests who were treated empirically for pulmonary tuberculosis over a five-year period (2015-2020) was performed. Additionally, a literature search was performed on Medline (PubMed), Cochrane and Google Scholar databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the five-year period, 20 patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis and severe burns requiring ventilation were managed according to the protocol and all survived to discharge. The literature search identified six factors that explain the consequence of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients and provide a hypothesis for the negative laboratory studies encountered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was an improved outcome for patients with the clinical diagnosis of reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis when they were started on empirical pulmonary tuberculosis treatment. There are several potential mechanisms that can contribute to reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis in susceptible severely burned patients. The GeneXpert test should not be relied upon in these patients for a diagnosis, but rather all other clinical evidence should inform management.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>From the current literature evidence most patients who have severe burns complicated by a secondary infection known as pulmonary (lung) tuberculosis, die as a result. The purpose of this report is to share our experience with treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis during a five-year period, from 2015 to 2020, in a specialized adult tertiary burn center. Severely burned patients who were suspected of having pulmonary tuberculosis and received treatment despite having negative laboratory tests for pulmonary tuberculosis, had a better survival rate than expected. A brief literature review on the topic of pulmonary tuberculosis and severe burns was done to investigate causes for reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis and negative laboratory studies in these patients.The literature search identified the following factors that can potentially affect the reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: decreased immune system; secondary infections; low blood albumin(protein) levels; decreased clearance of bacteria from the airways, the development of pulmonary tuberculosis biofilms (capsules that protect the bacteria from chemicals and antibiotics) and the role of a fat molecule called phosphatidylinositol mannoside in pulmonary tuberculosis.In conclusion, the pulmonary tuberculosis test should not be relied upon in these patients, but rather all the clinical evidence such X-ray changes in association with difficulty to wean the patient off the ventilator should be used to inform treatment choice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scars, burns & healing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a3/0b/10.1177_20595131231175794.PMC10433730.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scars, burns & healing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20595131231175794\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scars, burns & healing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20595131231175794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:肺结核再激活是撒哈拉以南非洲地区烧伤患者中一种普遍的伴随感染和死亡原因。在这些患者中,肺结核的一线实验室诊断研究往往是阴性的,如果依赖,就会导致高死亡率。本报告的目的是分享我们在三级烧伤中心对GeneXpert阴性严重烧伤患者临床疑似肺结核的新方案的经验,并就该主题进行简要的文献综述。方法:回顾性分析5年(2015-2020年)期间接受肺结核经验性治疗的所有GeneXpert检测阴性的吸入性热损伤患者。此外,在Medline (PubMed)、Cochrane和Google Scholar数据库中进行文献检索。结果:5年间,20例疑似肺结核合并严重烧伤需通气的患者均按该方案治疗,全部存活出院。文献检索确定了六个解释严重烧伤患者肺结核后果的因素,并为遇到的阴性实验室研究提供了假设。结论:临床诊断为肺结核复燃的患者在开始经验性肺结核治疗后,预后有所改善。在易感严重烧伤患者中,有几种可能的机制可以促进肺结核的再激活。在这些患者中,不应依赖GeneXpert检测进行诊断,而应根据所有其他临床证据为管理提供信息。概要:从目前的文献证据来看,大多数严重烧伤并发继发性感染(即肺结核)的患者最终死亡。本报告的目的是分享我们在2015年至2020年的五年间在专业成人三级烧伤中心治疗肺结核的经验。怀疑患有肺结核的严重烧伤患者,尽管肺结核实验室检查呈阴性,但仍接受了治疗,其存活率高于预期。本文对肺结核和严重烧伤的文献进行了简要回顾,以调查这些患者肺结核复发的原因和阴性实验室研究。文献检索确定了以下可能影响严重烧伤患者肺结核再激活的因素:免疫系统下降;二次感染;低血白蛋白(蛋白)水平;呼吸道细菌清除率降低,肺结核生物膜(保护细菌免受化学物质和抗生素侵害的胶囊)的形成,以及一种被称为磷脂酰肌醇甘露糖苷的脂肪分子在肺结核中的作用。总之,这些患者不应依赖肺结核检查,而应使用所有临床证据,如x线变化与患者难以脱离呼吸机相关,以指导治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Protocol for clinical diagnosis and empiric treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: observations and literature review.

Protocol for clinical diagnosis and empiric treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: observations and literature review.

Protocol for clinical diagnosis and empiric treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: observations and literature review.

Protocol for clinical diagnosis and empiric treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: observations and literature review.

Introduction: Reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis is a prevalent concomitant infection and cause for mortality in burns patients in Sub-Saharan Africa. First line laboratory diagnostic studies for pulmonary tuberculosis are often negative in these patients and if relied on, result in high mortality. The purpose of this report is to share our experience with a novel protocol of empiric treatment of clinically suspected pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients with negative GeneXpert tests in a tertiary burns centre and to present a brief literature review on the topic.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients, who sustained thermal injury with an inhalation component, with negative GeneXpert tests who were treated empirically for pulmonary tuberculosis over a five-year period (2015-2020) was performed. Additionally, a literature search was performed on Medline (PubMed), Cochrane and Google Scholar databases.

Results: Over the five-year period, 20 patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis and severe burns requiring ventilation were managed according to the protocol and all survived to discharge. The literature search identified six factors that explain the consequence of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients and provide a hypothesis for the negative laboratory studies encountered.

Conclusion: There was an improved outcome for patients with the clinical diagnosis of reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis when they were started on empirical pulmonary tuberculosis treatment. There are several potential mechanisms that can contribute to reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis in susceptible severely burned patients. The GeneXpert test should not be relied upon in these patients for a diagnosis, but rather all other clinical evidence should inform management.

Lay summary: From the current literature evidence most patients who have severe burns complicated by a secondary infection known as pulmonary (lung) tuberculosis, die as a result. The purpose of this report is to share our experience with treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis during a five-year period, from 2015 to 2020, in a specialized adult tertiary burn center. Severely burned patients who were suspected of having pulmonary tuberculosis and received treatment despite having negative laboratory tests for pulmonary tuberculosis, had a better survival rate than expected. A brief literature review on the topic of pulmonary tuberculosis and severe burns was done to investigate causes for reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis and negative laboratory studies in these patients.The literature search identified the following factors that can potentially affect the reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: decreased immune system; secondary infections; low blood albumin(protein) levels; decreased clearance of bacteria from the airways, the development of pulmonary tuberculosis biofilms (capsules that protect the bacteria from chemicals and antibiotics) and the role of a fat molecule called phosphatidylinositol mannoside in pulmonary tuberculosis.In conclusion, the pulmonary tuberculosis test should not be relied upon in these patients, but rather all the clinical evidence such X-ray changes in association with difficulty to wean the patient off the ventilator should be used to inform treatment choice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信