Nupur N Dalal, Laura M Gaydos, Scott E Gillespie, Christina J Calamaro, Rajit K Basu
{"title":"环境与文化:儿童重症监护倦怠驱动因素的横断面调查。","authors":"Nupur N Dalal, Laura M Gaydos, Scott E Gillespie, Christina J Calamaro, Rajit K Basu","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1730917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Very little data is available to understand the drivers of burnout amongst health care workers in the pediatric intensive care unit. This is a survey-based, cross-sectional, point-prevalence analysis within a single children's health system with two free-standing hospitals (one academic and one private) to characterize the relationship of demographics, organizational support, organizational culture, relationship quality, conflict and work schedules with self-reported burnout. Burnout was identified in 152 (39.7%) of the 383 (38.7%) respondents. No significant relationship was identified between burnout and demographic factors or work schedule. A more constructive culture (odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.90; <i>p</i> < 0.001), more organizational support (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.96; <i>p</i> <0 0.001), and better staff relationships (OR, 0.54, 95% CI, 0.43-0.69; <i>p</i> < 0.001) reduced odds of burnout. More conflict increased odds (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.12-1.39; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Less organizational support ( <i>Z</i> <sub>β</sub> = 0.425) was the most important factor associated with burnout overall. A work environment where staff experience defensive cultures, poor relationships, more frequent conflict, and feel unsupported by the organization is associated with significantly higher odds of burnout in pediatric critical care. The effect of targeted interventions to promote constructive cultures, collegiality, and organizational support on burnout in pediatric intensive care should be studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":44426,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9897953/pdf/10-1055-s-0041-1730917.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environment and Culture, a Cross-Sectional Survey on Drivers of Burnout in Pediatric Intensive Care.\",\"authors\":\"Nupur N Dalal, Laura M Gaydos, Scott E Gillespie, Christina J Calamaro, Rajit K Basu\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1730917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Very little data is available to understand the drivers of burnout amongst health care workers in the pediatric intensive care unit. This is a survey-based, cross-sectional, point-prevalence analysis within a single children's health system with two free-standing hospitals (one academic and one private) to characterize the relationship of demographics, organizational support, organizational culture, relationship quality, conflict and work schedules with self-reported burnout. Burnout was identified in 152 (39.7%) of the 383 (38.7%) respondents. No significant relationship was identified between burnout and demographic factors or work schedule. A more constructive culture (odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.90; <i>p</i> < 0.001), more organizational support (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.96; <i>p</i> <0 0.001), and better staff relationships (OR, 0.54, 95% CI, 0.43-0.69; <i>p</i> < 0.001) reduced odds of burnout. More conflict increased odds (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.12-1.39; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Less organizational support ( <i>Z</i> <sub>β</sub> = 0.425) was the most important factor associated with burnout overall. A work environment where staff experience defensive cultures, poor relationships, more frequent conflict, and feel unsupported by the organization is associated with significantly higher odds of burnout in pediatric critical care. The effect of targeted interventions to promote constructive cultures, collegiality, and organizational support on burnout in pediatric intensive care should be studied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9897953/pdf/10-1055-s-0041-1730917.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730917\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
很少有数据可用于了解在儿科重症监护病房的卫生保健工作者倦怠的驱动因素。这是一项基于调查的、横断面的、点流行分析,在一个有两家独立医院(一所学术医院和一所私立医院)的单一儿童卫生系统中,以表征人口统计学、组织支持、组织文化、关系质量、冲突和工作时间表与自我报告的倦怠之间的关系。在383名(38.7%)受访者中,有152名(39.7%)被认为倦怠。职业倦怠与人口学因素或工作时间无显著关系。更具建设性的文化(优势比[OR], 0.84;95%置信区间[CI], 0.77-0.90;p p p p Z β = 0.425)是影响倦怠的最重要因素。在一个工作环境中,员工经历防御性文化、糟糕的人际关系、更频繁的冲突,并感到得不到组织的支持,这与儿科重症护理中出现倦怠的几率显著增加有关。有针对性的干预措施,以促进建设性的文化,合作和组织支持对倦怠儿科重症监护的影响应进行研究。
Environment and Culture, a Cross-Sectional Survey on Drivers of Burnout in Pediatric Intensive Care.
Very little data is available to understand the drivers of burnout amongst health care workers in the pediatric intensive care unit. This is a survey-based, cross-sectional, point-prevalence analysis within a single children's health system with two free-standing hospitals (one academic and one private) to characterize the relationship of demographics, organizational support, organizational culture, relationship quality, conflict and work schedules with self-reported burnout. Burnout was identified in 152 (39.7%) of the 383 (38.7%) respondents. No significant relationship was identified between burnout and demographic factors or work schedule. A more constructive culture (odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.90; p < 0.001), more organizational support (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.96; p <0 0.001), and better staff relationships (OR, 0.54, 95% CI, 0.43-0.69; p < 0.001) reduced odds of burnout. More conflict increased odds (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.12-1.39; p < 0.001). Less organizational support ( Zβ = 0.425) was the most important factor associated with burnout overall. A work environment where staff experience defensive cultures, poor relationships, more frequent conflict, and feel unsupported by the organization is associated with significantly higher odds of burnout in pediatric critical care. The effect of targeted interventions to promote constructive cultures, collegiality, and organizational support on burnout in pediatric intensive care should be studied.