N95口罩预防COVID-19传播的有效性

Yagya Narayan, Sanghamitro Chatterjee, Amit Agrawal, Rajneesh Bhardwaj
{"title":"N95口罩预防COVID-19传播的有效性","authors":"Yagya Narayan,&nbsp;Sanghamitro Chatterjee,&nbsp;Amit Agrawal,&nbsp;Rajneesh Bhardwaj","doi":"10.1007/s41403-023-00394-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>N95 mask has emerged as a potential measure to mitigate the airborne transmission of respiratory disease such as COVID-19. Herein, we experimentally investigated the impact and interaction of pure water droplets as surrogate to respiratory droplets with the different layers of a commercially available N95 mask to demonstrate the penetration and passage-capability of respiratory fluids through the different layers. The penetration of an impacting droplet through the mask layers was characterized by elucidating the ejection of secondary droplets from the rear-side surface of the target mask material. In addition, the passage of respiratory fluids through the mask layers was characterized by capillary imbibition of the droplet liquid through the pores, as a function of wettability of the mask material. Droplet impact at Weber numbers We = 208 and 416 has been considered in the present study; the chosen We range corresponds to that of cough droplets realized in real respiratory events. Each layer of the N95 mask is hydrophobic that prevents capillary imbibition through the pores: a sessile droplet placed over the surface exhibits classical diffusion-limited evaporation. Droplet impact experiments on N95 mask layer surfaces reveal that a single layer allows liquid penetration at We = 416; while a combination of five layers, as is the case of a commercially available N95 mask, blocks the penetration completely, consistent with the widely known effectiveness of N95 masks. Herein, we devote special attention to compare the so-obtained efficiency of N95 masks to that of a recently designed two-layer cloth mask containing an intermediate High-Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filter layer (Narayan et al. in Phys Fluids 34:061703, 2022). We conclusively show that the performance of the designed cloth mask is identical to that of a commercially available N95 mask. The assessment of mask effectiveness further includes examination of breathability and comfort by means of passage of air through them. A comparative study has been presented herein for a clear demonstration of effectiveness of different masks in preventing air-borne transmission of COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":75237,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Indian National Academy of Engineering : an international journal of engineering and technology","volume":"8 2","pages":"253-262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947910/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of N95 Mask in Preventing COVID-19 Transmission.\",\"authors\":\"Yagya Narayan,&nbsp;Sanghamitro Chatterjee,&nbsp;Amit Agrawal,&nbsp;Rajneesh Bhardwaj\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41403-023-00394-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>N95 mask has emerged as a potential measure to mitigate the airborne transmission of respiratory disease such as COVID-19. Herein, we experimentally investigated the impact and interaction of pure water droplets as surrogate to respiratory droplets with the different layers of a commercially available N95 mask to demonstrate the penetration and passage-capability of respiratory fluids through the different layers. The penetration of an impacting droplet through the mask layers was characterized by elucidating the ejection of secondary droplets from the rear-side surface of the target mask material. In addition, the passage of respiratory fluids through the mask layers was characterized by capillary imbibition of the droplet liquid through the pores, as a function of wettability of the mask material. Droplet impact at Weber numbers We = 208 and 416 has been considered in the present study; the chosen We range corresponds to that of cough droplets realized in real respiratory events. Each layer of the N95 mask is hydrophobic that prevents capillary imbibition through the pores: a sessile droplet placed over the surface exhibits classical diffusion-limited evaporation. Droplet impact experiments on N95 mask layer surfaces reveal that a single layer allows liquid penetration at We = 416; while a combination of five layers, as is the case of a commercially available N95 mask, blocks the penetration completely, consistent with the widely known effectiveness of N95 masks. Herein, we devote special attention to compare the so-obtained efficiency of N95 masks to that of a recently designed two-layer cloth mask containing an intermediate High-Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filter layer (Narayan et al. in Phys Fluids 34:061703, 2022). We conclusively show that the performance of the designed cloth mask is identical to that of a commercially available N95 mask. The assessment of mask effectiveness further includes examination of breathability and comfort by means of passage of air through them. A comparative study has been presented herein for a clear demonstration of effectiveness of different masks in preventing air-borne transmission of COVID-19.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the Indian National Academy of Engineering : an international journal of engineering and technology\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"253-262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947910/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the Indian National Academy of Engineering : an international journal of engineering and technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41403-023-00394-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Indian National Academy of Engineering : an international journal of engineering and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41403-023-00394-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

N95口罩已成为缓解COVID-19等呼吸系统疾病在空气中传播的潜在措施。在此,我们通过实验研究了纯水水滴作为替代品与市售N95口罩不同层的呼吸液滴的影响和相互作用,以证明呼吸道液体通过不同层的渗透和通过能力。通过阐明从目标掩膜材料背面喷射出的二次液滴,表征了冲击液滴穿透掩膜层的过程。此外,呼吸道液体通过面罩层的特征是液滴液体通过毛孔的毛细吸吮,这是面罩材料润湿性的函数。本研究考虑了韦伯数We = 208和416时液滴的撞击;所选We范围与实际呼吸事件中实现的咳嗽飞沫的We范围相对应。N95口罩的每一层都是疏水性的,可以防止毛细血管通过毛孔的吸吮:放置在表面上的无根液滴表现出经典的扩散限制蒸发。液滴对N95掩膜层表面的冲击实验表明,在We = 416时,单层允许液体穿透;而市面上可买到的N95口罩由五层组成,完全阻挡了病毒的渗透,这与众所周知的N95口罩的有效性一致。在此,我们特别关注将N95口罩的效率与最近设计的含有中间高效微粒空气(HEPA)过滤层的双层布口罩的效率进行比较(Narayan et al. in Phys fluid 34:061703, 2022)。我们最终表明,设计的布口罩的性能与市售的N95口罩相同。对口罩有效性的评估还包括检查空气通过口罩的透气性和舒适度。本文通过对比研究,清楚地展示了不同口罩在预防COVID-19空气传播中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effectiveness of N95 Mask in Preventing COVID-19 Transmission.

Effectiveness of N95 Mask in Preventing COVID-19 Transmission.

Effectiveness of N95 Mask in Preventing COVID-19 Transmission.

Effectiveness of N95 Mask in Preventing COVID-19 Transmission.

N95 mask has emerged as a potential measure to mitigate the airborne transmission of respiratory disease such as COVID-19. Herein, we experimentally investigated the impact and interaction of pure water droplets as surrogate to respiratory droplets with the different layers of a commercially available N95 mask to demonstrate the penetration and passage-capability of respiratory fluids through the different layers. The penetration of an impacting droplet through the mask layers was characterized by elucidating the ejection of secondary droplets from the rear-side surface of the target mask material. In addition, the passage of respiratory fluids through the mask layers was characterized by capillary imbibition of the droplet liquid through the pores, as a function of wettability of the mask material. Droplet impact at Weber numbers We = 208 and 416 has been considered in the present study; the chosen We range corresponds to that of cough droplets realized in real respiratory events. Each layer of the N95 mask is hydrophobic that prevents capillary imbibition through the pores: a sessile droplet placed over the surface exhibits classical diffusion-limited evaporation. Droplet impact experiments on N95 mask layer surfaces reveal that a single layer allows liquid penetration at We = 416; while a combination of five layers, as is the case of a commercially available N95 mask, blocks the penetration completely, consistent with the widely known effectiveness of N95 masks. Herein, we devote special attention to compare the so-obtained efficiency of N95 masks to that of a recently designed two-layer cloth mask containing an intermediate High-Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filter layer (Narayan et al. in Phys Fluids 34:061703, 2022). We conclusively show that the performance of the designed cloth mask is identical to that of a commercially available N95 mask. The assessment of mask effectiveness further includes examination of breathability and comfort by means of passage of air through them. A comparative study has been presented herein for a clear demonstration of effectiveness of different masks in preventing air-borne transmission of COVID-19.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信