位置特异性富集比矩阵得分可从深度测序数据中预测抗体变异特性。

IF 4.4 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Matthew D Smith, Marshall A Case, Emily K Makowski, Peter M Tessier
{"title":"位置特异性富集比矩阵得分可从深度测序数据中预测抗体变异特性。","authors":"Matthew D Smith, Marshall A Case, Emily K Makowski, Peter M Tessier","doi":"10.1093/bioinformatics/btad446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Motivation: </strong>Deep sequencing of antibody and related protein libraries after phage or yeast-surface display sorting is widely used to identify variants with increased affinity, specificity, and/or improvements in key biophysical properties. Conventional approaches for identifying optimal variants typically use the frequencies of observation in enriched libraries or the corresponding enrichment ratios. However, these approaches disregard the vast majority of deep sequencing data and often fail to identify the best variants in the libraries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here, we present a method, Position-Specific Enrichment Ratio Matrix (PSERM) scoring, that uses entire deep sequencing datasets from pre- and post-selections to score each observed protein variant. The PSERM scores are the sum of the site-specific enrichment ratios observed at each mutated position. We find that PSERM scores are much more reproducible and correlate more strongly with experimentally measured properties than frequencies or enrichment ratios, including for multiple antibody properties (affinity and non-specific binding) for a clinical-stage antibody (emibetuzumab). We expect that this method will be broadly applicable to diverse protein engineering campaigns.</p><p><strong>Availability and implementation: </strong>All deep sequencing datasets and code to perform the analyses presented within are available via https://github.com/Tessier-Lab-UMich/PSERM_paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":8903,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformatics","volume":"39 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10477941/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Position-Specific Enrichment Ratio Matrix scores predict antibody variant properties from deep sequencing data.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew D Smith, Marshall A Case, Emily K Makowski, Peter M Tessier\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bioinformatics/btad446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Motivation: </strong>Deep sequencing of antibody and related protein libraries after phage or yeast-surface display sorting is widely used to identify variants with increased affinity, specificity, and/or improvements in key biophysical properties. Conventional approaches for identifying optimal variants typically use the frequencies of observation in enriched libraries or the corresponding enrichment ratios. However, these approaches disregard the vast majority of deep sequencing data and often fail to identify the best variants in the libraries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here, we present a method, Position-Specific Enrichment Ratio Matrix (PSERM) scoring, that uses entire deep sequencing datasets from pre- and post-selections to score each observed protein variant. The PSERM scores are the sum of the site-specific enrichment ratios observed at each mutated position. We find that PSERM scores are much more reproducible and correlate more strongly with experimentally measured properties than frequencies or enrichment ratios, including for multiple antibody properties (affinity and non-specific binding) for a clinical-stage antibody (emibetuzumab). We expect that this method will be broadly applicable to diverse protein engineering campaigns.</p><p><strong>Availability and implementation: </strong>All deep sequencing datasets and code to perform the analyses presented within are available via https://github.com/Tessier-Lab-UMich/PSERM_paper.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioinformatics\",\"volume\":\"39 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10477941/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad446\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad446","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动机噬菌体或酵母表面展示分选后的抗体和相关蛋白文库的深度测序被广泛用于鉴定亲和性、特异性和/或关键生物物理特性改进的变体。识别最佳变体的传统方法通常使用富集文库中的观察频率或相应的富集比。然而,这些方法忽略了绝大多数深度测序数据,往往无法识别文库中的最佳变体:在这里,我们提出了一种位置特异性富集比矩阵(PSERM)评分法,它使用选择前和选择后的整个深度测序数据集对每个观察到的蛋白质变体进行评分。PSERM 分数是在每个变异位置观察到的特定位点富集比的总和。我们发现,与频率或富集比相比,PSERM 评分的可重复性要高得多,而且与实验测量的特性相关性更强,包括临床阶段抗体(埃贝珠单抗)的多种抗体特性(亲和力和非特异性结合)。我们希望这种方法能广泛适用于各种蛋白质工程活动:所有深度测序数据集和执行分析的代码均可通过 https://github.com/Tessier-Lab-UMich/PSERM_paper 获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Position-Specific Enrichment Ratio Matrix scores predict antibody variant properties from deep sequencing data.

Position-Specific Enrichment Ratio Matrix scores predict antibody variant properties from deep sequencing data.

Position-Specific Enrichment Ratio Matrix scores predict antibody variant properties from deep sequencing data.

Position-Specific Enrichment Ratio Matrix scores predict antibody variant properties from deep sequencing data.

Motivation: Deep sequencing of antibody and related protein libraries after phage or yeast-surface display sorting is widely used to identify variants with increased affinity, specificity, and/or improvements in key biophysical properties. Conventional approaches for identifying optimal variants typically use the frequencies of observation in enriched libraries or the corresponding enrichment ratios. However, these approaches disregard the vast majority of deep sequencing data and often fail to identify the best variants in the libraries.

Results: Here, we present a method, Position-Specific Enrichment Ratio Matrix (PSERM) scoring, that uses entire deep sequencing datasets from pre- and post-selections to score each observed protein variant. The PSERM scores are the sum of the site-specific enrichment ratios observed at each mutated position. We find that PSERM scores are much more reproducible and correlate more strongly with experimentally measured properties than frequencies or enrichment ratios, including for multiple antibody properties (affinity and non-specific binding) for a clinical-stage antibody (emibetuzumab). We expect that this method will be broadly applicable to diverse protein engineering campaigns.

Availability and implementation: All deep sequencing datasets and code to perform the analyses presented within are available via https://github.com/Tessier-Lab-UMich/PSERM_paper.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioinformatics
Bioinformatics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
5.20%
发文量
753
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: The leading journal in its field, Bioinformatics publishes the highest quality scientific papers and review articles of interest to academic and industrial researchers. Its main focus is on new developments in genome bioinformatics and computational biology. Two distinct sections within the journal - Discovery Notes and Application Notes- focus on shorter papers; the former reporting biologically interesting discoveries using computational methods, the latter exploring the applications used for experiments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信