用逻辑模型促进社区参与刑事法律创新研究。

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
Social work Pub Date : 2023-09-14 DOI:10.1093/sw/swad032
Matthew W Epperson, Samantha Guz, Sophia P Sarantakos
{"title":"用逻辑模型促进社区参与刑事法律创新研究。","authors":"Matthew W Epperson,&nbsp;Samantha Guz,&nbsp;Sophia P Sarantakos","doi":"10.1093/sw/swad032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a persistent disconnect between research and practice, both in the social work profession as well as in the criminal legal system. Community-engaged research has been suggested as an approach to bridge this divide, but specific tools are needed to integrate research and practice efforts. This article presents three distinct logic model development processes that occurred in collaborative research and practice efforts in the context of criminal legal programming, including prosecutor-led diversion programs, a high-intensity drug court, and a multiagency justice and mental health collaborative. Logic model development incorporated multiple forms of program information using collaborative reflexivity, an approach focused on understanding the relationship between knowledge and power in the research process. For each program, the authors describe the context and process of logic model development, and how the logic models were used by both practitioners and researchers. The authors discuss how collaborative logic model development can facilitate community-engaged research, strengthen the research-practice connection, and advance applied social work scholarship.</p>","PeriodicalId":21875,"journal":{"name":"Social work","volume":"68 4","pages":"307-319"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fostering Community-Engaged Research on Criminal Legal Innovations with Logic Models.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew W Epperson,&nbsp;Samantha Guz,&nbsp;Sophia P Sarantakos\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sw/swad032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a persistent disconnect between research and practice, both in the social work profession as well as in the criminal legal system. Community-engaged research has been suggested as an approach to bridge this divide, but specific tools are needed to integrate research and practice efforts. This article presents three distinct logic model development processes that occurred in collaborative research and practice efforts in the context of criminal legal programming, including prosecutor-led diversion programs, a high-intensity drug court, and a multiagency justice and mental health collaborative. Logic model development incorporated multiple forms of program information using collaborative reflexivity, an approach focused on understanding the relationship between knowledge and power in the research process. For each program, the authors describe the context and process of logic model development, and how the logic models were used by both practitioners and researchers. The authors discuss how collaborative logic model development can facilitate community-engaged research, strengthen the research-practice connection, and advance applied social work scholarship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social work\",\"volume\":\"68 4\",\"pages\":\"307-319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swad032\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swad032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无论是在社会工作行业还是在刑事法律体系中,研究与实践之间一直存在脱节。有人建议将社区参与研究作为弥合这一鸿沟的一种方法,但需要具体的工具来整合研究和实践工作。本文介绍了刑事法律规划背景下合作研究和实践工作中发生的三个不同的逻辑模型开发过程,包括检察官主导的分流计划、高强度毒品法庭以及多机构司法和心理健康合作。逻辑模型开发使用协作自反性结合了多种形式的程序信息,这种方法侧重于理解研究过程中知识和权力之间的关系。对于每个程序,作者描述了逻辑模型开发的背景和过程,以及从业者和研究人员如何使用逻辑模型。作者讨论了协作逻辑模型开发如何促进社区参与研究,加强研究与实践的联系,并提高应用社会工作学术水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fostering Community-Engaged Research on Criminal Legal Innovations with Logic Models.

There is a persistent disconnect between research and practice, both in the social work profession as well as in the criminal legal system. Community-engaged research has been suggested as an approach to bridge this divide, but specific tools are needed to integrate research and practice efforts. This article presents three distinct logic model development processes that occurred in collaborative research and practice efforts in the context of criminal legal programming, including prosecutor-led diversion programs, a high-intensity drug court, and a multiagency justice and mental health collaborative. Logic model development incorporated multiple forms of program information using collaborative reflexivity, an approach focused on understanding the relationship between knowledge and power in the research process. For each program, the authors describe the context and process of logic model development, and how the logic models were used by both practitioners and researchers. The authors discuss how collaborative logic model development can facilitate community-engaged research, strengthen the research-practice connection, and advance applied social work scholarship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social work
Social work SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信