导管消融治疗房性心动过速期间基线节律的预后意义。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Clinical Research in Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-15 DOI:10.1007/s00392-023-02292-3
Ann-Kathrin Kahle, Fares-Alexander Alken, Katharina Scherschel, Christian Meyer
{"title":"导管消融治疗房性心动过速期间基线节律的预后意义。","authors":"Ann-Kathrin Kahle, Fares-Alexander Alken, Katharina Scherschel, Christian Meyer","doi":"10.1007/s00392-023-02292-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial tachycardias (AT) occurring in patients after previous atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are increasingly observed in clinical practice. Catheter ablation is the treatment of choice but an optimal workflow to improve patient outcome has not been defined. The purpose of this study was to assess procedural and clinical outcome depending on baseline rhythm at the beginning of AT ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 380 patients (69 (61-75) years, 56.6% male) who underwent catheter ablation for consecutive AT after previous AF ablation were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the beginning of the procedure, 140 patients (36.8%) presented in sinus rhythm (SR), 208 (54.7%) with AT and 32 (8.4%) with AF. Patients in SR or with AT underwent shorter procedures (173 (132-213) minutes vs. 161 (120-203) minutes vs. 226 (154-249) minutes; p = 0.002) with more frequent termination to SR (87.9% vs. 81.3% vs. 56.3%; p < 0.001) than patients with AF. Acute procedural success did not differ between patients in SR or with AT but was higher compared to those with AF (96.4% vs. 97.1% vs. 87.5%; p = 0.033). During a follow-up of 290 (181-680) days, patients in baseline SR experienced arrhythmia recurrences less often (36.4% vs. 49.5% vs. 68.8%; p = 0.002) than patients with AT or AF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baseline rhythm during AT ablation predicts procedural and clinical outcome. Whereas acute procedural success does not differ between patients in SR or with AT, patients presenting in SR have a more favorable mid-term success rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"53-63"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic implications of baseline rhythm during catheter ablation for atrial tachycardia.\",\"authors\":\"Ann-Kathrin Kahle, Fares-Alexander Alken, Katharina Scherschel, Christian Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00392-023-02292-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial tachycardias (AT) occurring in patients after previous atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are increasingly observed in clinical practice. Catheter ablation is the treatment of choice but an optimal workflow to improve patient outcome has not been defined. The purpose of this study was to assess procedural and clinical outcome depending on baseline rhythm at the beginning of AT ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 380 patients (69 (61-75) years, 56.6% male) who underwent catheter ablation for consecutive AT after previous AF ablation were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the beginning of the procedure, 140 patients (36.8%) presented in sinus rhythm (SR), 208 (54.7%) with AT and 32 (8.4%) with AF. Patients in SR or with AT underwent shorter procedures (173 (132-213) minutes vs. 161 (120-203) minutes vs. 226 (154-249) minutes; p = 0.002) with more frequent termination to SR (87.9% vs. 81.3% vs. 56.3%; p < 0.001) than patients with AF. Acute procedural success did not differ between patients in SR or with AT but was higher compared to those with AF (96.4% vs. 97.1% vs. 87.5%; p = 0.033). During a follow-up of 290 (181-680) days, patients in baseline SR experienced arrhythmia recurrences less often (36.4% vs. 49.5% vs. 68.8%; p = 0.002) than patients with AT or AF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baseline rhythm during AT ablation predicts procedural and clinical outcome. Whereas acute procedural success does not differ between patients in SR or with AT, patients presenting in SR have a more favorable mid-term success rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"53-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02292-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02292-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心房心动过速(AT)发生在既往房颤(AF)消融后的患者在临床实践中越来越多地被观察到。导管消融是首选的治疗方法,但改善患者预后的最佳工作流程尚未确定。本研究的目的是评估基于at消融开始时基线节律的程序和临床结果。方法:380例患者(69(61 ~ 75)岁,男性56.6%)在房颤消融后行导管消融治疗。结果:在手术开始时,140例(36.8%)患者出现窦性心律(SR), 208例(54.7%)出现At, 32例(8.4%)出现AF。SR或At患者的手术时间较短(173(132-213)分钟vs 161(120-203)分钟vs 226(154-249)分钟;p = 0.002),终止SR的频率更高(87.9% vs. 81.3% vs. 56.3%;结论:AT消融期间的基线节律可预测手术和临床结果。尽管急性手术成功率在SR患者和AT患者之间没有差异,但SR患者有更有利的中期成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prognostic implications of baseline rhythm during catheter ablation for atrial tachycardia.

Prognostic implications of baseline rhythm during catheter ablation for atrial tachycardia.

Background: Atrial tachycardias (AT) occurring in patients after previous atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are increasingly observed in clinical practice. Catheter ablation is the treatment of choice but an optimal workflow to improve patient outcome has not been defined. The purpose of this study was to assess procedural and clinical outcome depending on baseline rhythm at the beginning of AT ablation.

Methods: A total of 380 patients (69 (61-75) years, 56.6% male) who underwent catheter ablation for consecutive AT after previous AF ablation were studied.

Results: At the beginning of the procedure, 140 patients (36.8%) presented in sinus rhythm (SR), 208 (54.7%) with AT and 32 (8.4%) with AF. Patients in SR or with AT underwent shorter procedures (173 (132-213) minutes vs. 161 (120-203) minutes vs. 226 (154-249) minutes; p = 0.002) with more frequent termination to SR (87.9% vs. 81.3% vs. 56.3%; p < 0.001) than patients with AF. Acute procedural success did not differ between patients in SR or with AT but was higher compared to those with AF (96.4% vs. 97.1% vs. 87.5%; p = 0.033). During a follow-up of 290 (181-680) days, patients in baseline SR experienced arrhythmia recurrences less often (36.4% vs. 49.5% vs. 68.8%; p = 0.002) than patients with AT or AF.

Conclusion: Baseline rhythm during AT ablation predicts procedural and clinical outcome. Whereas acute procedural success does not differ between patients in SR or with AT, patients presenting in SR have a more favorable mid-term success rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信