成人上颌切口治疗前后倾斜度的比较:与面轴和生长轴的关系。

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-03 DOI:10.4103/ccd.ccd_158_21
Samar Bou Assi, Anthony Macari, Antoine Hanna, Josephine Aybout, Ziad Salameh
{"title":"成人上颌切口治疗前后倾斜度的比较:与面轴和生长轴的关系。","authors":"Samar Bou Assi, Anthony Macari, Antoine Hanna, Josephine Aybout, Ziad Salameh","doi":"10.4103/ccd.ccd_158_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study is to evaluate the orthodontic treatment effect on maxillary incisors' inclination relative to facial and growth axes in adult subjects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Hundred consecutive nongrowing orthodontic patients with an average age of 26.24 ± 9.29 years were selected, and their T1 (initial) and T2 (final) lateral cephalograms were digitized. Cephalometric maxillary incisors' (I) inclination was measured to SN, PP, NA, NBa, and true horizontal (H). Facial and growth axes' inclinations were measured relative to NBa and H. Associations were tested using Chi-square tests for categorical data. Paired sample <i>t</i>-tests and Pearson's correlation were computed for continuous data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maxillary incisors' inclination, MP/SN, and ANB angle did not show statistically significant differences between T1 and T2, while mandibular incisors' inclination and interincisal angle increased significantly (<i>P</i> = 0.01 and <i>P</i> = 0.02, respectively). Facial and growth axes increased at T2 but changes were not statistically significant among the two groups. At T1, correlations between maxillary incisors' inclination and facial/growth axes were not statistically significant. Similarly, correlations between MP/SN and ANB angles on the one hand and facial/growth axes on the another hand were not statistically significant. At T2, I/PP correlated significantly with facial axis (FA)/NBa (<i>r</i> = 0.308; <i>P</i> = 0.002) and with FA/H (<i>r</i> = 0.268; <i>P</i> = 0.007). Similarly, I/SN and I/NBa correlated significantly with FA/NBa (<i>r</i> = 0.399; <i>P</i> < 0.0001 and <i>r</i> = 0.422; <i>P</i> < 0.0001 correspondingly) and with FA/H (<i>r</i> = 0.305; <i>P</i> = 0.002 and <i>r</i> = 0.325; <i>P</i> = 0.001 correspondingly). Statistically significant negative correlations existed between MP/SN angle and facial/growth axes at T2 (r values ranging -0.704 to -0.409 at <i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While there was no correlation between I and facial/growth axes at pretreatment, significant and higher correlations existed at the end of the orthodontic treatment. This association reflects the connection between the corrected posttreatment position of maxillary incisors relative to the corresponding vertical pattern. Therefore, orthodontists should evaluate the position of the maxillary incisors to FA and may consider it in their treatment objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":10632,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/45/4b/CCD-13-344.PMC9855265.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between Pre and Posttreatment Inclination of Maxillary Incisors in Adults: Association with Facial and Growth Axes.\",\"authors\":\"Samar Bou Assi, Anthony Macari, Antoine Hanna, Josephine Aybout, Ziad Salameh\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ccd.ccd_158_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study is to evaluate the orthodontic treatment effect on maxillary incisors' inclination relative to facial and growth axes in adult subjects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Hundred consecutive nongrowing orthodontic patients with an average age of 26.24 ± 9.29 years were selected, and their T1 (initial) and T2 (final) lateral cephalograms were digitized. Cephalometric maxillary incisors' (I) inclination was measured to SN, PP, NA, NBa, and true horizontal (H). Facial and growth axes' inclinations were measured relative to NBa and H. Associations were tested using Chi-square tests for categorical data. Paired sample <i>t</i>-tests and Pearson's correlation were computed for continuous data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maxillary incisors' inclination, MP/SN, and ANB angle did not show statistically significant differences between T1 and T2, while mandibular incisors' inclination and interincisal angle increased significantly (<i>P</i> = 0.01 and <i>P</i> = 0.02, respectively). Facial and growth axes increased at T2 but changes were not statistically significant among the two groups. At T1, correlations between maxillary incisors' inclination and facial/growth axes were not statistically significant. Similarly, correlations between MP/SN and ANB angles on the one hand and facial/growth axes on the another hand were not statistically significant. At T2, I/PP correlated significantly with facial axis (FA)/NBa (<i>r</i> = 0.308; <i>P</i> = 0.002) and with FA/H (<i>r</i> = 0.268; <i>P</i> = 0.007). Similarly, I/SN and I/NBa correlated significantly with FA/NBa (<i>r</i> = 0.399; <i>P</i> < 0.0001 and <i>r</i> = 0.422; <i>P</i> < 0.0001 correspondingly) and with FA/H (<i>r</i> = 0.305; <i>P</i> = 0.002 and <i>r</i> = 0.325; <i>P</i> = 0.001 correspondingly). Statistically significant negative correlations existed between MP/SN angle and facial/growth axes at T2 (r values ranging -0.704 to -0.409 at <i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While there was no correlation between I and facial/growth axes at pretreatment, significant and higher correlations existed at the end of the orthodontic treatment. This association reflects the connection between the corrected posttreatment position of maxillary incisors relative to the corresponding vertical pattern. Therefore, orthodontists should evaluate the position of the maxillary incisors to FA and may consider it in their treatment objectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/45/4b/CCD-13-344.PMC9855265.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_158_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_158_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估成人上颌切牙相对于面轴和生长轴倾斜的正畸治疗效果。材料和方法:选择100名平均年龄为26.24±9.29岁的连续非赛艇正畸患者,对他们的T1(初始)和T2(最终)侧位头影进行数字化。头位测量上颌切牙(I)的倾斜度测量为SN、PP、NA、NBa和真水平(H)。面部和生长轴的倾斜度是相对于NBa和H.测量的。使用卡方检验对分类数据进行关联性测试。计算连续数据的配对样本t检验和Pearson相关性。结果:上颌切牙的倾斜度、MP/SN和ANB角在T1和T2之间没有统计学上的显著差异,而下颌切牙的倾斜度和牙间角显著增加(分别为P=0.01和P=0.02)。面部和生长轴在T2时增加,但两组之间的变化没有统计学意义。在T1,上颌切牙的倾斜度与面部/生长轴之间的相关性没有统计学意义。同样,一方面MP/SN和ANB角度与另一方面面部/生长轴之间的相关性没有统计学意义。在T2时,I/PP与面轴(FA)/NBa(r=0.308;P=0.002)和FA/H(r=0.268;P=0.007)显著相关。同样,I/SN和I/NBa与FA/NBa显著相关(r=0.399;相应地,P<0.0001和r=0.422;相应地P<0.0001)和FA/H(r=0.305;P=0.002和r=0.325;相应地P=0.001)。在T2时,MP/SN角与面部/生长轴之间存在统计学上显著的负相关(r值在-0.704至-0.409之间,P<0.0001)。结论:虽然在治疗前I与面部/增长轴之间没有相关性,但在正畸治疗结束时存在显著且更高的相关性。这种关联反映了上颌切牙治疗后的校正位置与相应垂直模式之间的联系。因此,正畸医生应该评估上颌切牙对FA的位置,并可能将其纳入他们的治疗目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison between Pre and Posttreatment Inclination of Maxillary Incisors in Adults: Association with Facial and Growth Axes.

Comparison between Pre and Posttreatment Inclination of Maxillary Incisors in Adults: Association with Facial and Growth Axes.

Comparison between Pre and Posttreatment Inclination of Maxillary Incisors in Adults: Association with Facial and Growth Axes.

Objective: The objective of the study is to evaluate the orthodontic treatment effect on maxillary incisors' inclination relative to facial and growth axes in adult subjects.

Materials and methods: Hundred consecutive nongrowing orthodontic patients with an average age of 26.24 ± 9.29 years were selected, and their T1 (initial) and T2 (final) lateral cephalograms were digitized. Cephalometric maxillary incisors' (I) inclination was measured to SN, PP, NA, NBa, and true horizontal (H). Facial and growth axes' inclinations were measured relative to NBa and H. Associations were tested using Chi-square tests for categorical data. Paired sample t-tests and Pearson's correlation were computed for continuous data.

Results: Maxillary incisors' inclination, MP/SN, and ANB angle did not show statistically significant differences between T1 and T2, while mandibular incisors' inclination and interincisal angle increased significantly (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). Facial and growth axes increased at T2 but changes were not statistically significant among the two groups. At T1, correlations between maxillary incisors' inclination and facial/growth axes were not statistically significant. Similarly, correlations between MP/SN and ANB angles on the one hand and facial/growth axes on the another hand were not statistically significant. At T2, I/PP correlated significantly with facial axis (FA)/NBa (r = 0.308; P = 0.002) and with FA/H (r = 0.268; P = 0.007). Similarly, I/SN and I/NBa correlated significantly with FA/NBa (r = 0.399; P < 0.0001 and r = 0.422; P < 0.0001 correspondingly) and with FA/H (r = 0.305; P = 0.002 and r = 0.325; P = 0.001 correspondingly). Statistically significant negative correlations existed between MP/SN angle and facial/growth axes at T2 (r values ranging -0.704 to -0.409 at P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: While there was no correlation between I and facial/growth axes at pretreatment, significant and higher correlations existed at the end of the orthodontic treatment. This association reflects the connection between the corrected posttreatment position of maxillary incisors relative to the corresponding vertical pattern. Therefore, orthodontists should evaluate the position of the maxillary incisors to FA and may consider it in their treatment objectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Contemporary Clinical Dentistry (CCD) (Print ISSN: 0976-237X, E-ISSN:0976- 2361) is peer-reviewed journal published on behalf of Maharishi Markandeshwar University and issues are published quarterly in the last week of March, June, September and December. The Journal publishes Original research papers, clinical studies, case series strictly of clinical interest. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of Dentistry i.e. Conservative dentistry and Endodontics, Dentofacial orthopedics and Orthodontics, Oral medicine and Radiology, Oral pathology, Oral surgery, Orodental diseases, Pediatric Dentistry, Periodontics, Clinical aspects of Public Health dentistry and Prosthodontics. Review articles are not accepted. Review, if published, will only be by invitation from eminent scholars and academicians of National and International repute in the field of Medical/Dental education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信