基于人工智能的大肠活检分诊可以改善工作流程

Q2 Medicine
Frederick George Mayall , Mark David Goodhead , Louis de Mendonça , Sarah Eleanor Brownlie , Azka Anees , Stephen Perring
{"title":"基于人工智能的大肠活检分诊可以改善工作流程","authors":"Frederick George Mayall ,&nbsp;Mark David Goodhead ,&nbsp;Louis de Mendonça ,&nbsp;Sarah Eleanor Brownlie ,&nbsp;Azka Anees ,&nbsp;Stephen Perring","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Large bowel biopsies are one of the commonest types of biopsy specimen. We describe a service evaluation study to test the feasibility of using artificial intelligence (AI) to triage large bowel biopsies from a reporting backlog and prioritize those that require more urgent reporting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The pathway was developed in the UK by National Health Service (NHS) laboratory staff working in a medium-sized general hospital.   The AI platform was interfaced with the slide scanner software and the reporting platform’s software, so that pathologists could correct the AI label and reinforce the training set as they reported the cases.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The AI classifier achieved a sensitivity of 97.56% and specificity of 93.02% for the case-level-diagnosis of neoplasia (adenoma and adenocarcinoma) and for an AI diagnosis of any significant pathology (i.e., adenomas, adenocarcinomas, inflammation, hyperplastic polyps, and sessile serrated lesions) sensitivity was 95.65% and specificity 92.96%. The automated AI diagnostic classification pathway took approximately 175 s per slide to download and process the scanned whole slide image (WSI) and return an AI diagnostic classification. Biopsies with an AI diagnosis of neoplasia or inflammation were prioritized for reporting while the remainder followed the routine reporting pathway. The AI triaged pathway resulted in a significantly shorter reporting turnaround time for pathologist verified neoplastic cases (P &lt; 0.001) and inflammation (P &lt; 0.05). The project’s costs amounted to  £14800, excluding laboratory staff salaries. More time and resources were spent on developing the interface between the AI platform and laboratory IT systems than on the development of the AI platform itself.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>NHS laboratory staff were able to implement an AI solution to accurately triage large bowel biopsies into several diagnostic classes and this improved reporting turnaround times for cases with neoplasia or with inflammation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852686/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence-based triage of large bowel biopsies can improve workflow\",\"authors\":\"Frederick George Mayall ,&nbsp;Mark David Goodhead ,&nbsp;Louis de Mendonça ,&nbsp;Sarah Eleanor Brownlie ,&nbsp;Azka Anees ,&nbsp;Stephen Perring\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Large bowel biopsies are one of the commonest types of biopsy specimen. We describe a service evaluation study to test the feasibility of using artificial intelligence (AI) to triage large bowel biopsies from a reporting backlog and prioritize those that require more urgent reporting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The pathway was developed in the UK by National Health Service (NHS) laboratory staff working in a medium-sized general hospital.   The AI platform was interfaced with the slide scanner software and the reporting platform’s software, so that pathologists could correct the AI label and reinforce the training set as they reported the cases.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The AI classifier achieved a sensitivity of 97.56% and specificity of 93.02% for the case-level-diagnosis of neoplasia (adenoma and adenocarcinoma) and for an AI diagnosis of any significant pathology (i.e., adenomas, adenocarcinomas, inflammation, hyperplastic polyps, and sessile serrated lesions) sensitivity was 95.65% and specificity 92.96%. The automated AI diagnostic classification pathway took approximately 175 s per slide to download and process the scanned whole slide image (WSI) and return an AI diagnostic classification. Biopsies with an AI diagnosis of neoplasia or inflammation were prioritized for reporting while the remainder followed the routine reporting pathway. The AI triaged pathway resulted in a significantly shorter reporting turnaround time for pathologist verified neoplastic cases (P &lt; 0.001) and inflammation (P &lt; 0.05). The project’s costs amounted to  £14800, excluding laboratory staff salaries. More time and resources were spent on developing the interface between the AI platform and laboratory IT systems than on the development of the AI platform itself.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>NHS laboratory staff were able to implement an AI solution to accurately triage large bowel biopsies into several diagnostic classes and this improved reporting turnaround times for cases with neoplasia or with inflammation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9852686/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353922007817\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353922007817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:大肠活检是最常见的活检标本之一。我们描述了一项服务评估研究,以测试使用人工智能(AI)从报告积压中分类大肠活检并优先考虑那些需要更紧急报告的可行性。方法该途径由英国一家中型综合医院的国家卫生服务(NHS)实验室工作人员开发。 人工智能平台与载玻片扫描软件和报告平台软件进行接口,病理学家在报告病例时可以纠正人工智能标签并强化训练集。结果人工智能分类器对肿瘤(腺瘤和腺癌)的病例级诊断敏感性为97.56%,特异性为93.02%,对任何重大病理(腺瘤、腺癌、炎症、增殖性息肉、无根锯齿状病变)的人工智能诊断敏感性为95.65%,特异性为92.96%。自动AI诊断分类路径每张幻灯片大约需要175秒的时间来下载和处理扫描的整张幻灯片图像(WSI)并返回AI诊断分类。人工智能诊断为肿瘤或炎症的活检优先报告,其余的则遵循常规报告途径。人工智能分类途径显著缩短了病理学家证实的肿瘤病例的报告周转时间(P <0.001)和炎症(P <0.05)。该项目的成本为 £14800,不包括实验室工作人员的工资。人工智能平台与实验室IT系统之间的接口开发比人工智能平台本身的开发花费了更多的时间和资源。结论snhs实验室工作人员能够实施人工智能解决方案,准确地将大肠活检分类为几个诊断类别,这缩短了肿瘤或炎症病例的报告时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Artificial intelligence-based triage of large bowel biopsies can improve workflow

Artificial intelligence-based triage of large bowel biopsies can improve workflow

Artificial intelligence-based triage of large bowel biopsies can improve workflow

Artificial intelligence-based triage of large bowel biopsies can improve workflow

Background

Large bowel biopsies are one of the commonest types of biopsy specimen. We describe a service evaluation study to test the feasibility of using artificial intelligence (AI) to triage large bowel biopsies from a reporting backlog and prioritize those that require more urgent reporting.

Methods

The pathway was developed in the UK by National Health Service (NHS) laboratory staff working in a medium-sized general hospital.   The AI platform was interfaced with the slide scanner software and the reporting platform’s software, so that pathologists could correct the AI label and reinforce the training set as they reported the cases.

Results

The AI classifier achieved a sensitivity of 97.56% and specificity of 93.02% for the case-level-diagnosis of neoplasia (adenoma and adenocarcinoma) and for an AI diagnosis of any significant pathology (i.e., adenomas, adenocarcinomas, inflammation, hyperplastic polyps, and sessile serrated lesions) sensitivity was 95.65% and specificity 92.96%. The automated AI diagnostic classification pathway took approximately 175 s per slide to download and process the scanned whole slide image (WSI) and return an AI diagnostic classification. Biopsies with an AI diagnosis of neoplasia or inflammation were prioritized for reporting while the remainder followed the routine reporting pathway. The AI triaged pathway resulted in a significantly shorter reporting turnaround time for pathologist verified neoplastic cases (P < 0.001) and inflammation (P < 0.05). The project’s costs amounted to  £14800, excluding laboratory staff salaries. More time and resources were spent on developing the interface between the AI platform and laboratory IT systems than on the development of the AI platform itself.

Conclusions

NHS laboratory staff were able to implement an AI solution to accurately triage large bowel biopsies into several diagnostic classes and this improved reporting turnaround times for cases with neoplasia or with inflammation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Journal of Pathology Informatics Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信