BRCA1/2致病变异妇女的对侧预防性乳房切除术:总生存率、种族和人种差异。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Breast Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-31 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/1447545
Sukh Makhnoon, Angelica M Gutierrez Barrera, Roland Bassett, Aimaz Afrough, Isabelle Bedrosian, Banu K Arun
{"title":"BRCA1/2致病变异妇女的对侧预防性乳房切除术:总生存率、种族和人种差异。","authors":"Sukh Makhnoon, Angelica M Gutierrez Barrera, Roland Bassett, Aimaz Afrough, Isabelle Bedrosian, Banu K Arun","doi":"10.1155/2022/1447545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with unilateral breast cancer carrying pathogenic variants in <i>BRCA1/2</i> have the option to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). However, differences in CPM use and survival outcomes following CPM are poorly understood in this high-risk population, in part due to a lack of data from contemporary clinical cohorts. The objective of this study was to evaluate post-CPM overall survival (OS) and related racial/ethnic differences in a contemporary clinical cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of women with a personal history of unilateral breast cancer carrying pathogenic variants in <i>BRCA1/2</i> who were diagnosed between 1996 and 2012. Genetic test results, self-reported demographic characteristics, and clinical factors were abstracted from electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 144 BRCA-positive patients, the majority were White (79.2%, <i>n</i> = 114). Overall, 56.1% (<i>n</i> = 81) of all <i>BRCA1/2</i> carriers chose to undergo CPM, with no racial/ethnic difference in CPM election (<i>p</i> = 0.78). Of 81 patients who underwent CPM, there is strong evidence of a difference in survival between the racial/ethnic groups, with White patients having the highest OS compared to non-White patients (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Of the 63 patients who did not undergo CPM, there is no racial/ethnic difference in overall survival (<i>p</i> = 0.61). In multivariable cox regression, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics, OS was significantly lower among non-Whites than in Whites (HR = 0.39, <i>p</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluation of a contemporary clinical cohort of BRCA-positive women with unilateral breast cancer showed no racial/ethnic difference in CPM use, but there was a significant difference in post-CPM overall survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":56326,"journal":{"name":"Breast Journal","volume":"2022 ","pages":"1447545"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy among Women with Pathogenic Variants in <i>BRCA1/2</i>: Overall Survival, Racial, and Ethnic Differences.\",\"authors\":\"Sukh Makhnoon, Angelica M Gutierrez Barrera, Roland Bassett, Aimaz Afrough, Isabelle Bedrosian, Banu K Arun\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/1447545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with unilateral breast cancer carrying pathogenic variants in <i>BRCA1/2</i> have the option to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). However, differences in CPM use and survival outcomes following CPM are poorly understood in this high-risk population, in part due to a lack of data from contemporary clinical cohorts. The objective of this study was to evaluate post-CPM overall survival (OS) and related racial/ethnic differences in a contemporary clinical cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of women with a personal history of unilateral breast cancer carrying pathogenic variants in <i>BRCA1/2</i> who were diagnosed between 1996 and 2012. Genetic test results, self-reported demographic characteristics, and clinical factors were abstracted from electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 144 BRCA-positive patients, the majority were White (79.2%, <i>n</i> = 114). Overall, 56.1% (<i>n</i> = 81) of all <i>BRCA1/2</i> carriers chose to undergo CPM, with no racial/ethnic difference in CPM election (<i>p</i> = 0.78). Of 81 patients who underwent CPM, there is strong evidence of a difference in survival between the racial/ethnic groups, with White patients having the highest OS compared to non-White patients (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Of the 63 patients who did not undergo CPM, there is no racial/ethnic difference in overall survival (<i>p</i> = 0.61). In multivariable cox regression, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics, OS was significantly lower among non-Whites than in Whites (HR = 0.39, <i>p</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluation of a contemporary clinical cohort of BRCA-positive women with unilateral breast cancer showed no racial/ethnic difference in CPM use, but there was a significant difference in post-CPM overall survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Journal\",\"volume\":\"2022 \",\"pages\":\"1447545\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9825211/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1447545\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1447545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:携带 BRCA1/2 基因变异的单侧乳腺癌患者可以选择进行对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)。然而,人们对这一高风险人群使用 CPM 的差异以及 CPM 后的生存结果知之甚少,部分原因是缺乏来自当代临床队列的数据。本研究旨在评估当代临床队列中 CPM 术后总生存率(OS)及相关种族/民族差异:我们回顾性地查阅了 1996 年至 2012 年间确诊的携带 BRCA1/2 致病变异的单侧乳腺癌女性的病历。我们从电子病历中摘录了基因检测结果、自我报告的人口统计学特征和临床因素:在 144 名 BRCA 阳性患者中,大多数为白人(79.2%,n = 114)。总体而言,在所有 BRCA1/2 携带者中,56.1%(n = 81)的人选择接受 CPM,在 CPM 选择上没有种族/人种差异(p = 0.78)。在 81 名接受 CPM 的患者中,有确凿证据表明种族/人种间的生存率存在差异,白人患者的 OS 比非白人患者最高(p = 0.001)。在 63 名未接受 CPM 的患者中,总生存率没有种族/族裔差异(p = 0.61)。经人口统计学和临床特征调整后,在多变量Cox回归中,非白种人的OS明显低于白种人(HR = 0.39,P = 0.04):对当代单侧乳腺癌 BRCA 阳性女性临床队列的评估显示,在 CPM 的使用上没有种族/民族差异,但在 CPM 后的总生存率上存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy among Women with Pathogenic Variants in <i>BRCA1/2</i>: Overall Survival, Racial, and Ethnic Differences.

Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy among Women with Pathogenic Variants in <i>BRCA1/2</i>: Overall Survival, Racial, and Ethnic Differences.

Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy among Women with Pathogenic Variants in BRCA1/2: Overall Survival, Racial, and Ethnic Differences.

Background: Patients with unilateral breast cancer carrying pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 have the option to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). However, differences in CPM use and survival outcomes following CPM are poorly understood in this high-risk population, in part due to a lack of data from contemporary clinical cohorts. The objective of this study was to evaluate post-CPM overall survival (OS) and related racial/ethnic differences in a contemporary clinical cohort.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of women with a personal history of unilateral breast cancer carrying pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 who were diagnosed between 1996 and 2012. Genetic test results, self-reported demographic characteristics, and clinical factors were abstracted from electronic medical records.

Results: Of 144 BRCA-positive patients, the majority were White (79.2%, n = 114). Overall, 56.1% (n = 81) of all BRCA1/2 carriers chose to undergo CPM, with no racial/ethnic difference in CPM election (p = 0.78). Of 81 patients who underwent CPM, there is strong evidence of a difference in survival between the racial/ethnic groups, with White patients having the highest OS compared to non-White patients (p = 0.001). Of the 63 patients who did not undergo CPM, there is no racial/ethnic difference in overall survival (p = 0.61). In multivariable cox regression, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics, OS was significantly lower among non-Whites than in Whites (HR = 0.39, p = 0.04).

Conclusions: Evaluation of a contemporary clinical cohort of BRCA-positive women with unilateral breast cancer showed no racial/ethnic difference in CPM use, but there was a significant difference in post-CPM overall survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Journal
Breast Journal 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Breast Journal is the first comprehensive, multidisciplinary source devoted exclusively to all facets of research, diagnosis, and treatment of breast disease. The Breast Journal encompasses the latest news and technologies from the many medical specialties concerned with breast disease care in order to address the disease within the context of an integrated breast health care. This editorial philosophy recognizes the special social, sexual, and psychological considerations that distinguish cancer, and breast cancer in particular, from other serious diseases. Topics specifically within the scope of The Breast Journal include: Risk Factors Prevention Early Detection Diagnosis and Therapy Psychological Issues Quality of Life Biology of Breast Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信