在警察拘留的医疗保健专业人员的合作工作:破坏护理-拘留悖论。

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Gethin Rees
{"title":"在警察拘留的医疗保健专业人员的合作工作:破坏护理-拘留悖论。","authors":"Gethin Rees","doi":"10.1080/10439463.2022.2055020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Forensic medicine has traditionally been understood as constituting a tension between medical and legal roles: a care-custody paradox. Rather than reinforcing this paradox, however, in this paper I will draw upon a study of Healthcare Professionals working within police custody suites in England in order to show the ways that they coproduce [Jasanoff, S., 2004. <i>States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order</i>. London: Routledge] their work with the aim of simultaneously meeting the requirements of both their police (for instance PACE codes) and healthcare (for instance the Nursing and Midwifery Code of Practice) responsibilities. Focusing on acts of 'mundane care' [Brownlie, J. and Spandler, H., 2018. Materialities of mundane care and the art of holding one's own. <i>Sociology of health and illness</i>, 40 (2), 256-269], the typification of detainees and the use of detention cells as risk management tools, I will show that rather than undergoing an existential crisis, Healthcare Professionals mobilise coproduced practices in order to perform their work successfully, thereby further enabling police and detention officers to achieve their custody objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":47763,"journal":{"name":"Policing & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872946/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The coproduction work of healthcare professionals in police custody: destabilising the care-custody paradox.\",\"authors\":\"Gethin Rees\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10439463.2022.2055020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Forensic medicine has traditionally been understood as constituting a tension between medical and legal roles: a care-custody paradox. Rather than reinforcing this paradox, however, in this paper I will draw upon a study of Healthcare Professionals working within police custody suites in England in order to show the ways that they coproduce [Jasanoff, S., 2004. <i>States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order</i>. London: Routledge] their work with the aim of simultaneously meeting the requirements of both their police (for instance PACE codes) and healthcare (for instance the Nursing and Midwifery Code of Practice) responsibilities. Focusing on acts of 'mundane care' [Brownlie, J. and Spandler, H., 2018. Materialities of mundane care and the art of holding one's own. <i>Sociology of health and illness</i>, 40 (2), 256-269], the typification of detainees and the use of detention cells as risk management tools, I will show that rather than undergoing an existential crisis, Healthcare Professionals mobilise coproduced practices in order to perform their work successfully, thereby further enabling police and detention officers to achieve their custody objectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policing & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872946/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policing & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2022.2055020\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2022.2055020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,法医学被理解为构成医疗和法律角色之间的紧张关系:一种照料-监护的悖论。然而,与其强化这一悖论,在本文中,我将借鉴一项对在英国警察拘留所工作的医疗保健专业人员的研究,以展示他们共同产生的方式[Jasanoff, S., 2004]。知识状态:科学与社会秩序的共同产物。[伦敦:劳特利奇]他们的工作目的是同时满足他们的警察(例如PACE代码)和医疗保健(例如护理和助产实践代码)职责的要求。关注“平凡关怀”的行为[Brownlie, J. and Spandler, H., 2018]。物质的世俗关怀和保持自己的艺术。[健康与疾病社会学,40(2),256-269],被拘留者的典型化以及将拘留室作为风险管理工具的使用,我将表明,医疗保健专业人员为了成功地完成工作,动员共同生产的做法,从而进一步使警察和拘留人员能够实现其拘留目标,而不是经历生存危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The coproduction work of healthcare professionals in police custody: destabilising the care-custody paradox.

Forensic medicine has traditionally been understood as constituting a tension between medical and legal roles: a care-custody paradox. Rather than reinforcing this paradox, however, in this paper I will draw upon a study of Healthcare Professionals working within police custody suites in England in order to show the ways that they coproduce [Jasanoff, S., 2004. States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge] their work with the aim of simultaneously meeting the requirements of both their police (for instance PACE codes) and healthcare (for instance the Nursing and Midwifery Code of Practice) responsibilities. Focusing on acts of 'mundane care' [Brownlie, J. and Spandler, H., 2018. Materialities of mundane care and the art of holding one's own. Sociology of health and illness, 40 (2), 256-269], the typification of detainees and the use of detention cells as risk management tools, I will show that rather than undergoing an existential crisis, Healthcare Professionals mobilise coproduced practices in order to perform their work successfully, thereby further enabling police and detention officers to achieve their custody objectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policing & Society
Policing & Society CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Policing & Society is widely acknowledged as the leading international academic journal specialising in the study of policing institutions and their practices. It is concerned with all aspects of how policing articulates and animates the social contexts in which it is located. This includes: • Social scientific investigations of police policy and activity • Legal and political analyses of police powers and governance • Management oriented research on aspects of police organisation Space is also devoted to the relationship between what the police do and the policing decisions and functions of communities, private sector organisations and other state agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信