深度学习预测前列腺消融治疗过程中无造影剂的非灌注体积。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Biomedical Engineering Letters Pub Date : 2022-11-08 eCollection Date: 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1007/s13534-022-00250-y
Cameron Wright, Pietari Mäkelä, Alexandre Bigot, Mikael Anttinen, Peter J Boström, Roberto Blanco Sequeiros
{"title":"深度学习预测前列腺消融治疗过程中无造影剂的非灌注体积。","authors":"Cameron Wright, Pietari Mäkelä, Alexandre Bigot, Mikael Anttinen, Peter J Boström, Roberto Blanco Sequeiros","doi":"10.1007/s13534-022-00250-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The non-perfused volume (NPV) is an important indicator of treatment success immediately after prostate ablation. However, visualization of the NPV first requires an injection of MRI contrast agents into the bloodstream, which has many downsides. Purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning model capable of predicting the NPV immediately after prostate ablation therapy without the need for MRI contrast agents. A modified 2D deep learning UNet model was developed to predict the post-treatment NPV. MRI imaging data from 95 patients who had previously undergone prostate ablation therapy for treatment of localized prostate cancer were used to train, validate, and test the model. Model inputs were T1/T2-weighted and thermometry MRI images, which were always acquired without any MRI contrast agents and prior to the final NPV image on treatment-day. Model output was the predicted NPV. Model accuracy was assessed using the Dice-Similarity Coefficient (DSC) by comparing the predicted to ground truth NPV. A radiologist also performed a qualitative assessment of NPV. Mean (std) DSC score for predicted NPV was 85% ± 8.1% compared to ground truth. Model performance was significantly better for slices with larger prostate radii (> 24 mm) and for whole-gland rather than partial ablation slices. The predicted NPV was indistinguishable from ground truth for 31% of images. Feasibility of predicting NPV using a UNet model without MRI contrast agents was clearly established. If developed further, this could improve patient treatment outcomes and could obviate the need for contrast agents altogether. <i>Trial Registration Numbers</i> Three studies were used to populate the data: NCT02766543, NCT03814252 and NCT03350529.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-022-00250-y.</p>","PeriodicalId":46898,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","volume":"13 1","pages":"31-40"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9873841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning prediction of non-perfused volume without contrast agents during prostate ablation therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Cameron Wright, Pietari Mäkelä, Alexandre Bigot, Mikael Anttinen, Peter J Boström, Roberto Blanco Sequeiros\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13534-022-00250-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The non-perfused volume (NPV) is an important indicator of treatment success immediately after prostate ablation. However, visualization of the NPV first requires an injection of MRI contrast agents into the bloodstream, which has many downsides. Purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning model capable of predicting the NPV immediately after prostate ablation therapy without the need for MRI contrast agents. A modified 2D deep learning UNet model was developed to predict the post-treatment NPV. MRI imaging data from 95 patients who had previously undergone prostate ablation therapy for treatment of localized prostate cancer were used to train, validate, and test the model. Model inputs were T1/T2-weighted and thermometry MRI images, which were always acquired without any MRI contrast agents and prior to the final NPV image on treatment-day. Model output was the predicted NPV. Model accuracy was assessed using the Dice-Similarity Coefficient (DSC) by comparing the predicted to ground truth NPV. A radiologist also performed a qualitative assessment of NPV. Mean (std) DSC score for predicted NPV was 85% ± 8.1% compared to ground truth. Model performance was significantly better for slices with larger prostate radii (> 24 mm) and for whole-gland rather than partial ablation slices. The predicted NPV was indistinguishable from ground truth for 31% of images. Feasibility of predicting NPV using a UNet model without MRI contrast agents was clearly established. If developed further, this could improve patient treatment outcomes and could obviate the need for contrast agents altogether. <i>Trial Registration Numbers</i> Three studies were used to populate the data: NCT02766543, NCT03814252 and NCT03350529.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-022-00250-y.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Engineering Letters\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"31-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9873841/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Engineering Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-022-00250-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-022-00250-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非灌注容积(NPV)是衡量前列腺消融术治疗成功与否的重要指标。然而,NPV 的可视化首先需要向血液中注射核磁共振成像造影剂,这有很多弊端。本研究的目的是开发一种深度学习模型,该模型能够预测前列腺消融治疗后的即时 NPV,而无需使用 MRI 造影剂。研究人员开发了一种改进的二维深度学习 UNet 模型,用于预测治疗后的 NPV。模型的训练、验证和测试使用了 95 名曾接受前列腺消融治疗的局部前列腺癌患者的 MRI 成像数据。模型输入为 T1/T2 加权和热成像 MRI 图像,这些图像均在治疗日最终 NPV 图像之前采集,且未使用任何 MRI 造影剂。模型输出为预测的 NPV。通过比较预测 NPV 和地面实况 NPV,使用骰子相似系数 (DSC) 评估模型的准确性。放射科医生也对 NPV 进行了定性评估。与地面实况相比,预测 NPV 的平均(std)DSC 分数为 85% ± 8.1%。前列腺半径较大(> 24 毫米)的切片以及全腺而非部分消融切片的模型性能明显更好。在 31% 的图像中,预测的 NPV 与地面实况无异。在不使用核磁共振成像造影剂的情况下,使用 UNet 模型预测 NPV 的可行性已得到明确证实。如果进一步发展,这将改善患者的治疗效果,并可完全避免使用造影剂。试验注册号 有三项研究用于填充数据:NCT02766543、NCT03814252 和 NCT03350529:在线版本包含补充材料,可在 10.1007/s13534-022-00250-y 网站上查阅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Deep learning prediction of non-perfused volume without contrast agents during prostate ablation therapy.

Deep learning prediction of non-perfused volume without contrast agents during prostate ablation therapy.

Deep learning prediction of non-perfused volume without contrast agents during prostate ablation therapy.

Deep learning prediction of non-perfused volume without contrast agents during prostate ablation therapy.

The non-perfused volume (NPV) is an important indicator of treatment success immediately after prostate ablation. However, visualization of the NPV first requires an injection of MRI contrast agents into the bloodstream, which has many downsides. Purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning model capable of predicting the NPV immediately after prostate ablation therapy without the need for MRI contrast agents. A modified 2D deep learning UNet model was developed to predict the post-treatment NPV. MRI imaging data from 95 patients who had previously undergone prostate ablation therapy for treatment of localized prostate cancer were used to train, validate, and test the model. Model inputs were T1/T2-weighted and thermometry MRI images, which were always acquired without any MRI contrast agents and prior to the final NPV image on treatment-day. Model output was the predicted NPV. Model accuracy was assessed using the Dice-Similarity Coefficient (DSC) by comparing the predicted to ground truth NPV. A radiologist also performed a qualitative assessment of NPV. Mean (std) DSC score for predicted NPV was 85% ± 8.1% compared to ground truth. Model performance was significantly better for slices with larger prostate radii (> 24 mm) and for whole-gland rather than partial ablation slices. The predicted NPV was indistinguishable from ground truth for 31% of images. Feasibility of predicting NPV using a UNet model without MRI contrast agents was clearly established. If developed further, this could improve patient treatment outcomes and could obviate the need for contrast agents altogether. Trial Registration Numbers Three studies were used to populate the data: NCT02766543, NCT03814252 and NCT03350529.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-022-00250-y.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Engineering Letters
Biomedical Engineering Letters ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Biomedical Engineering Letters (BMEL) aims to present the innovative experimental science and technological development in the biomedical field as well as clinical application of new development. The article must contain original biomedical engineering content, defined as development, theoretical analysis, and evaluation/validation of a new technique. BMEL publishes the following types of papers: original articles, review articles, editorials, and letters to the editor. All the papers are reviewed in single-blind fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信