超重/肥胖和体重正常的糖尿病患者心外膜脂肪和B期心力衰竭

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yukari Kobayashi, Tomoko Nishi, Jeffery W Christle, Nicholas Cauwenberghs, Tatiana Kuznetsova, Latha Palaniappan, Francois Haddad
{"title":"超重/肥胖和体重正常的糖尿病患者心外膜脂肪和B期心力衰竭","authors":"Yukari Kobayashi, Tomoko Nishi, Jeffery W Christle, Nicholas Cauwenberghs, Tatiana Kuznetsova, Latha Palaniappan, Francois Haddad","doi":"10.1007/s10554-023-02944-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although up to 20% of people with type 2 diabetes (DM) have normal BMI (< 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), it remains unclear whether there is a difference in the development of cardiac dysfunction between those with normal and higher BMI. Furthermore, little is known about the relationship of visceral fat with BMI or fitness in asymptomatic patients with DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled asymptomatic patients with DM and divided into two groups: BMI ≥ 25kg/m<sup>2</sup> (overweight/obese group) versus < 25kg/m<sup>2</sup>(normal-weight group). Resting echocardiogram followed by exercise stress echocardiogram and exercise gas exchange analysis (in a subgroup) was performed. Cardiac function was evaluated using left ventricular longitudinal strain (LVLS), E/e', and relative wall thickness (RWT). In addition, epicardial fat thickness (EFT) was measured to estimate visceral fat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Normal-weight patients with DM had more EFT compared with overweight/obese patients (0.66 ± 0.17 cm vs. 0.59 ± 0.22 cm, p < 0.05), despite the overlap between the groups. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of LV remodeling (p = 0.49), impaired LVLS (p = 0.22), or increased E/e' (p = 0.26), and these were consistently observed when matched for race. The majority of patients (63%) achieved ≥ 85% of percent peak-predicted VO<sub>2</sub>. At peak, there was no significant difference in peak VO<sub>2</sub> normalized by eLBM (36.4 ± 7.7 vs. 37.8 ± 7.1 ml/kg eLBM/min, p = 0.43) while VO<sub>2</sub> normalized by weight (23.6 ± 6.5 vs. 29.6 ± 6.7 ml/kg/min, p < 0.001) and VO<sub>2</sub> ratio (5.7 ± 1.7 vs. 7.3 ± 2.4 METs, p = 0.001) were significantly lower in patients with obese/overweight group. There was no significant difference between patients with higher and lower EFT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with DM and normal BMI have excess epicardial fat compared to those with overweight/obese. Epicardial fat was not directly linked to prevalence of subclinical dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":50332,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"2451-2461"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11088949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epicardial fat and Stage B heart failure among overweight/obese and normal weight individuals with diabetes mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Yukari Kobayashi, Tomoko Nishi, Jeffery W Christle, Nicholas Cauwenberghs, Tatiana Kuznetsova, Latha Palaniappan, Francois Haddad\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10554-023-02944-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although up to 20% of people with type 2 diabetes (DM) have normal BMI (< 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), it remains unclear whether there is a difference in the development of cardiac dysfunction between those with normal and higher BMI. Furthermore, little is known about the relationship of visceral fat with BMI or fitness in asymptomatic patients with DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled asymptomatic patients with DM and divided into two groups: BMI ≥ 25kg/m<sup>2</sup> (overweight/obese group) versus < 25kg/m<sup>2</sup>(normal-weight group). Resting echocardiogram followed by exercise stress echocardiogram and exercise gas exchange analysis (in a subgroup) was performed. Cardiac function was evaluated using left ventricular longitudinal strain (LVLS), E/e', and relative wall thickness (RWT). In addition, epicardial fat thickness (EFT) was measured to estimate visceral fat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Normal-weight patients with DM had more EFT compared with overweight/obese patients (0.66 ± 0.17 cm vs. 0.59 ± 0.22 cm, p < 0.05), despite the overlap between the groups. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of LV remodeling (p = 0.49), impaired LVLS (p = 0.22), or increased E/e' (p = 0.26), and these were consistently observed when matched for race. The majority of patients (63%) achieved ≥ 85% of percent peak-predicted VO<sub>2</sub>. At peak, there was no significant difference in peak VO<sub>2</sub> normalized by eLBM (36.4 ± 7.7 vs. 37.8 ± 7.1 ml/kg eLBM/min, p = 0.43) while VO<sub>2</sub> normalized by weight (23.6 ± 6.5 vs. 29.6 ± 6.7 ml/kg/min, p < 0.001) and VO<sub>2</sub> ratio (5.7 ± 1.7 vs. 7.3 ± 2.4 METs, p = 0.001) were significantly lower in patients with obese/overweight group. There was no significant difference between patients with higher and lower EFT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with DM and normal BMI have excess epicardial fat compared to those with overweight/obese. Epicardial fat was not directly linked to prevalence of subclinical dysfunction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2451-2461\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11088949/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02944-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02944-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管高达20%的2型糖尿病(DM)患者BMI正常(2),但目前尚不清楚BMI正常和较高的2型糖尿病患者在心功能障碍的发展方面是否存在差异。此外,对于无症状DM患者的内脏脂肪与BMI或健康的关系知之甚少。方法:我们前瞻性地招募无症状DM患者,并将其分为两组:BMI≥25kg/m2(超重/肥胖组)和2(正常体重组)。静息超声心动图、运动应激超声心动图和运动气体交换分析(亚组)。采用左心室纵应变(LVLS)、E/ E′和相对壁厚(RWT)评价心功能。此外,测量心外膜脂肪厚度(EFT)来估计内脏脂肪。结果:体重正常的糖尿病患者EFT高于超重/肥胖患者(0.66±0.17 cm vs 0.59±0.22 cm, p 2)。在峰值时,肥胖/超重组经eLBM归一化的VO2峰值(36.4±7.7 vs 37.8±7.1 ml/kg eLBM/min, p = 0.43)无显著差异,体重归一化的VO2峰值(23.6±6.5 vs 29.6±6.7 ml/kg/min, p = 0.001)显著降低。EFT高、低患者间无显著性差异。结论:与超重/肥胖患者相比,DM和正常BMI患者有多余的心外膜脂肪。心外膜脂肪与亚临床功能障碍患病率无直接关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epicardial fat and Stage B heart failure among overweight/obese and normal weight individuals with diabetes mellitus.

Purpose: Although up to 20% of people with type 2 diabetes (DM) have normal BMI (< 25 kg/m2), it remains unclear whether there is a difference in the development of cardiac dysfunction between those with normal and higher BMI. Furthermore, little is known about the relationship of visceral fat with BMI or fitness in asymptomatic patients with DM.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled asymptomatic patients with DM and divided into two groups: BMI ≥ 25kg/m2 (overweight/obese group) versus < 25kg/m2(normal-weight group). Resting echocardiogram followed by exercise stress echocardiogram and exercise gas exchange analysis (in a subgroup) was performed. Cardiac function was evaluated using left ventricular longitudinal strain (LVLS), E/e', and relative wall thickness (RWT). In addition, epicardial fat thickness (EFT) was measured to estimate visceral fat.

Results: Normal-weight patients with DM had more EFT compared with overweight/obese patients (0.66 ± 0.17 cm vs. 0.59 ± 0.22 cm, p < 0.05), despite the overlap between the groups. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of LV remodeling (p = 0.49), impaired LVLS (p = 0.22), or increased E/e' (p = 0.26), and these were consistently observed when matched for race. The majority of patients (63%) achieved ≥ 85% of percent peak-predicted VO2. At peak, there was no significant difference in peak VO2 normalized by eLBM (36.4 ± 7.7 vs. 37.8 ± 7.1 ml/kg eLBM/min, p = 0.43) while VO2 normalized by weight (23.6 ± 6.5 vs. 29.6 ± 6.7 ml/kg/min, p < 0.001) and VO2 ratio (5.7 ± 1.7 vs. 7.3 ± 2.4 METs, p = 0.001) were significantly lower in patients with obese/overweight group. There was no significant difference between patients with higher and lower EFT.

Conclusions: Patients with DM and normal BMI have excess epicardial fat compared to those with overweight/obese. Epicardial fat was not directly linked to prevalence of subclinical dysfunction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
77
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging publishes technical and clinical communications (original articles, review articles and editorial comments) associated with cardiovascular diseases. The technical communications include the research, development and evaluation of novel imaging methods in the various imaging domains. These domains include magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, X-ray imaging, intravascular imaging, and applications in nuclear cardiology and echocardiography, and any combination of these techniques. Of particular interest are topics in medical image processing and image-guided interventions. Clinical applications of such imaging techniques include improved diagnostic approaches, treatment , prognosis and follow-up of cardiovascular patients. Topics include: multi-center or larger individual studies dealing with risk stratification and imaging utilization, applications for better characterization of cardiovascular diseases, and assessment of the efficacy of new drugs and interventional devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信