在家工作:应对COVID-19大流行的放射科医生报告行为的变化

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yu Kuo, Kang-Lung Lee, Yi-Lun Chen, Ching-Yao Weng, Feng-Chi Chang, Tzeng-Ji Chen, Hsiu-Mei Wu, Chia-Hung Wu
{"title":"在家工作:应对COVID-19大流行的放射科医生报告行为的变化","authors":"Yu Kuo,&nbsp;Kang-Lung Lee,&nbsp;Yi-Lun Chen,&nbsp;Ching-Yao Weng,&nbsp;Feng-Chi Chang,&nbsp;Tzeng-Ji Chen,&nbsp;Hsiu-Mei Wu,&nbsp;Chia-Hung Wu","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remote reporting is an important preventive measure against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) for radiology departments; it reduces the chance of cross-infections between coworkers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how the preferred locations that radiologists filed reports from changed in response to COVID-19 by measuring the use of internal teleradiology workstations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from the radiological information system (RIS) database at our institution, which recorded the reporting workstation for each radiological examination. The reporting activities in 2021 were divided into computed radiography (CR) and computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) groups. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to measure differences in the use of off-site workstations in prepandemic, midpandemic, and postpandemic periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were statistically significant increases in the number of reports filed from off-site workstations for each attending physician from the prepandemic period to the midpandemic period in both the CR (15.1%-25.4%, p = 0.041) and CT/MRI (18.9%-28.7%, p = 0.006) groups. There was no significant difference noted between the prepandemic and postpandemic periods for either the CR (15.1% vs 18.4%, p = 0.727) or CT/MRI group (18.9% vs 23.3%, p = 0.236).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, radiologists used internal teleradiology to report CR and CT/MRI examinations significantly more frequently. In contrast to the predictions of previous studies, the use of internal teleradiology returned to baseline levels after the pandemic was under control.</p>","PeriodicalId":17251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association","volume":"86 9","pages":"859-864"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Working from home: Changes in radiologist reporting behavior in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Kuo,&nbsp;Kang-Lung Lee,&nbsp;Yi-Lun Chen,&nbsp;Ching-Yao Weng,&nbsp;Feng-Chi Chang,&nbsp;Tzeng-Ji Chen,&nbsp;Hsiu-Mei Wu,&nbsp;Chia-Hung Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remote reporting is an important preventive measure against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) for radiology departments; it reduces the chance of cross-infections between coworkers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how the preferred locations that radiologists filed reports from changed in response to COVID-19 by measuring the use of internal teleradiology workstations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from the radiological information system (RIS) database at our institution, which recorded the reporting workstation for each radiological examination. The reporting activities in 2021 were divided into computed radiography (CR) and computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) groups. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to measure differences in the use of off-site workstations in prepandemic, midpandemic, and postpandemic periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were statistically significant increases in the number of reports filed from off-site workstations for each attending physician from the prepandemic period to the midpandemic period in both the CR (15.1%-25.4%, p = 0.041) and CT/MRI (18.9%-28.7%, p = 0.006) groups. There was no significant difference noted between the prepandemic and postpandemic periods for either the CR (15.1% vs 18.4%, p = 0.727) or CT/MRI group (18.9% vs 23.3%, p = 0.236).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, radiologists used internal teleradiology to report CR and CT/MRI examinations significantly more frequently. In contrast to the predictions of previous studies, the use of internal teleradiology returned to baseline levels after the pandemic was under control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"86 9\",\"pages\":\"859-864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000962\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000962","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:远程报告是放射科预防2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的重要措施;它减少了同事之间交叉感染的机会。本研究的目的是通过测量内部远程放射学工作站的使用情况,评估放射科医生提交报告的首选地点如何因COVID-19而发生变化。方法:数据来源于我院放射学信息系统(RIS)数据库,该数据库记录了每次放射学检查的报告工作站。2021年的报告活动分为计算机x线摄影(CR)组和计算机断层扫描(CT)/磁共振成像(MRI)组。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验来测量大流行前、大流行中期和大流行后期间非现场工作站使用情况的差异。结果:从大流行前到大流行中期,CR组(15.1%-25.4%,p = 0.041)和CT/MRI组(18.9%-28.7%,p = 0.006)每位主治医生从非现场工作站提交的报告数量均有统计学意义上的显著增加。CR组(15.1% vs 18.4%, p = 0.727)或CT/MRI组(18.9% vs 23.3%, p = 0.236)在大流行前和大流行后期间均未发现显著差异。结论:为应对新冠肺炎疫情,放射科医师使用内部远程放射学报告CR和CT/MRI检查的频率明显增加。与以往研究的预测相反,在大流行得到控制后,内部远程放射学的使用恢复到基线水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Working from home: Changes in radiologist reporting behavior in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Remote reporting is an important preventive measure against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) for radiology departments; it reduces the chance of cross-infections between coworkers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how the preferred locations that radiologists filed reports from changed in response to COVID-19 by measuring the use of internal teleradiology workstations.

Methods: Data were obtained from the radiological information system (RIS) database at our institution, which recorded the reporting workstation for each radiological examination. The reporting activities in 2021 were divided into computed radiography (CR) and computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) groups. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to measure differences in the use of off-site workstations in prepandemic, midpandemic, and postpandemic periods.

Results: There were statistically significant increases in the number of reports filed from off-site workstations for each attending physician from the prepandemic period to the midpandemic period in both the CR (15.1%-25.4%, p = 0.041) and CT/MRI (18.9%-28.7%, p = 0.006) groups. There was no significant difference noted between the prepandemic and postpandemic periods for either the CR (15.1% vs 18.4%, p = 0.727) or CT/MRI group (18.9% vs 23.3%, p = 0.236).

Conclusion: In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, radiologists used internal teleradiology to report CR and CT/MRI examinations significantly more frequently. In contrast to the predictions of previous studies, the use of internal teleradiology returned to baseline levels after the pandemic was under control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
320
审稿时长
15.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, previously known as the Chinese Medical Journal (Taipei), has a long history of publishing scientific papers and has continuously made substantial contribution in the understanding and progress of a broad range of biomedical sciences. It is published monthly by Wolters Kluwer Health and indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), MEDLINE®, Index Medicus, EMBASE, CAB Abstracts, Sociedad Iberoamericana de Informacion Cientifica (SIIC) Data Bases, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Global Health. JCMA is the official and open access journal of the Chinese Medical Association, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China and is an international forum for scholarly reports in medicine, surgery, dentistry and basic research in biomedical science. As a vehicle of communication and education among physicians and scientists, the journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Reports of professional practice will need to demonstrate academic robustness and scientific rigor. Outstanding scholars are invited to give their update reviews on the perspectives of the evidence-based science in the related research field. Article types accepted include review articles, original articles, case reports, brief communications and letters to the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信