Ozturk Ates, Bulent Aksel, Mehmet Hadi Akkus, Irem Oner, Cemil Yuksel, Mutlu Dogan
{"title":"卵巢癌的HIPEC:何时,对谁?","authors":"Ozturk Ates, Bulent Aksel, Mehmet Hadi Akkus, Irem Oner, Cemil Yuksel, Mutlu Dogan","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.1001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the optimal candidates for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Health Sciences University, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtasian Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, between 2013 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Ovarian cancer patients who underwent HIPEC and CRS for peritoneal involvement were included in this study. Thermosolutions were prepared as a closed system by using HT 2000 hyperthermic perfusion device. Then, cisplatin was applied at 100 mg/m2 at 42-42.5 °C for 60 minutes after CRS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 patients were enrolled. The median age was 54 years (27-80) at the time of diagnosis. Forty (85.1%) patients had high grade serous carcinoma and 22 (46.7%) patients had clinical stage 3C disease. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 13 (3-24) in the whole population. HIPEC was applied as first-line treatment in 25 (51%) patients. Eleven (23.4%) patients had HIPEC in the post-neoadjuvant interval whereas 10 (21.3%) patients had it in platinum sensitive relapse. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 31(95% CI:11-50), 33 (95% CI:1-67), and 18 (95% CI:8-27) months in the primary, post-neoadjuvant interval, and platinum-sensitive relapse HIPEC groups, respectively. The patients with lower PCI (PCI<13) had significantly better OS than others with higher PCI (PCI>13, 145 months versus 42 months, p=0.034).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HIPEC with CRS should be considered in selected serous carcinoma patients with peritoneal involvement, especially for the patients with primary ovarian cancer with lower PCI (PCI<13).</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Ovarian cancer, HIPEC, Peritoneal cancer index.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"33 9","pages":"1001-1005"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HIPEC in Ovarian Cancer: When and to Whom?\",\"authors\":\"Ozturk Ates, Bulent Aksel, Mehmet Hadi Akkus, Irem Oner, Cemil Yuksel, Mutlu Dogan\",\"doi\":\"10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.1001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the optimal candidates for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Health Sciences University, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtasian Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, between 2013 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Ovarian cancer patients who underwent HIPEC and CRS for peritoneal involvement were included in this study. Thermosolutions were prepared as a closed system by using HT 2000 hyperthermic perfusion device. Then, cisplatin was applied at 100 mg/m2 at 42-42.5 °C for 60 minutes after CRS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 patients were enrolled. The median age was 54 years (27-80) at the time of diagnosis. Forty (85.1%) patients had high grade serous carcinoma and 22 (46.7%) patients had clinical stage 3C disease. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 13 (3-24) in the whole population. HIPEC was applied as first-line treatment in 25 (51%) patients. Eleven (23.4%) patients had HIPEC in the post-neoadjuvant interval whereas 10 (21.3%) patients had it in platinum sensitive relapse. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 31(95% CI:11-50), 33 (95% CI:1-67), and 18 (95% CI:8-27) months in the primary, post-neoadjuvant interval, and platinum-sensitive relapse HIPEC groups, respectively. The patients with lower PCI (PCI<13) had significantly better OS than others with higher PCI (PCI>13, 145 months versus 42 months, p=0.034).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HIPEC with CRS should be considered in selected serous carcinoma patients with peritoneal involvement, especially for the patients with primary ovarian cancer with lower PCI (PCI<13).</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Ovarian cancer, HIPEC, Peritoneal cancer index.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\"33 9\",\"pages\":\"1001-1005\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.1001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.1001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To evaluate the optimal candidates for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in ovarian cancer.
Study design: Descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Health Sciences University, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtasian Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, between 2013 and 2021.
Methodology: Ovarian cancer patients who underwent HIPEC and CRS for peritoneal involvement were included in this study. Thermosolutions were prepared as a closed system by using HT 2000 hyperthermic perfusion device. Then, cisplatin was applied at 100 mg/m2 at 42-42.5 °C for 60 minutes after CRS.
Results: A total of 47 patients were enrolled. The median age was 54 years (27-80) at the time of diagnosis. Forty (85.1%) patients had high grade serous carcinoma and 22 (46.7%) patients had clinical stage 3C disease. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 13 (3-24) in the whole population. HIPEC was applied as first-line treatment in 25 (51%) patients. Eleven (23.4%) patients had HIPEC in the post-neoadjuvant interval whereas 10 (21.3%) patients had it in platinum sensitive relapse. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 31(95% CI:11-50), 33 (95% CI:1-67), and 18 (95% CI:8-27) months in the primary, post-neoadjuvant interval, and platinum-sensitive relapse HIPEC groups, respectively. The patients with lower PCI (PCI<13) had significantly better OS than others with higher PCI (PCI>13, 145 months versus 42 months, p=0.034).
Conclusion: HIPEC with CRS should be considered in selected serous carcinoma patients with peritoneal involvement, especially for the patients with primary ovarian cancer with lower PCI (PCI<13).
Key words: Ovarian cancer, HIPEC, Peritoneal cancer index.