伊朗良好护理量表波斯语版本的翻译和心理测量。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Ahmad Esmalizadeh Msn, Mehdi Heidarzadeh PhD, Nargess Ramazanzadeh Msn, Mansoureh Karimollahi PhD
{"title":"伊朗良好护理量表波斯语版本的翻译和心理测量。","authors":"Ahmad Esmalizadeh Msn,&nbsp;Mehdi Heidarzadeh PhD,&nbsp;Nargess Ramazanzadeh Msn,&nbsp;Mansoureh Karimollahi PhD","doi":"10.1111/2047-3095.12413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and aim</h3>\n \n <p>Identifying and evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of nursing care provided to improve the quality of nursing care is increasingly emphasized, and it requires using valid tools in this field. This study aimed to translate and determine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the “Good Nursing Care Scale” (GNCS-P).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The present study is a methodological study in which the psychometric dimensions of GNCS-P were studied from the perspective of 200 patients who were admitted to the hospitals of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences. After translating the original version of the scale, its validity and reliability were evaluated and data analysis was performed using statistical package for social science (version 16) and analysis of moment structures (version 24).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The effect score of the item in the evaluation of face validity for each item was above 2.4. The content validity ratio for the scale was 0.88, and the content validity index tool was 0.86. The correlation of total instrument scores with the standard instrument was 0.839. According to the results of factor analysis, the values of factor loading of items were between 0.62 and 0.91, which were all significant. Therefore, the seven dimensions introduced in the main tool were approved. In addition, Cronbach's alpha results of 0.865 and correlation of 0.894 in the test–retest showed that the questionnaire has internal consistency and acceptable stability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The Persian version of the GNCS-P has acceptable psychometric properties in the Iranian population and can be used as a valid tool in the areas of quality assessment of nursing care, education, and nursing research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for Nursing Practice</h3>\n \n <p>The results showed the validity and reliability of the tool and its usability as a valid tool in evaluating the quality of nursing care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","volume":"35 1","pages":"40-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation and psychometrics of the Persian version of the Good Nursing Care Scale in Iran\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Esmalizadeh Msn,&nbsp;Mehdi Heidarzadeh PhD,&nbsp;Nargess Ramazanzadeh Msn,&nbsp;Mansoureh Karimollahi PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/2047-3095.12413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Identifying and evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of nursing care provided to improve the quality of nursing care is increasingly emphasized, and it requires using valid tools in this field. This study aimed to translate and determine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the “Good Nursing Care Scale” (GNCS-P).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The present study is a methodological study in which the psychometric dimensions of GNCS-P were studied from the perspective of 200 patients who were admitted to the hospitals of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences. After translating the original version of the scale, its validity and reliability were evaluated and data analysis was performed using statistical package for social science (version 16) and analysis of moment structures (version 24).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The effect score of the item in the evaluation of face validity for each item was above 2.4. The content validity ratio for the scale was 0.88, and the content validity index tool was 0.86. The correlation of total instrument scores with the standard instrument was 0.839. According to the results of factor analysis, the values of factor loading of items were between 0.62 and 0.91, which were all significant. Therefore, the seven dimensions introduced in the main tool were approved. In addition, Cronbach's alpha results of 0.865 and correlation of 0.894 in the test–retest showed that the questionnaire has internal consistency and acceptable stability.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Persian version of the GNCS-P has acceptable psychometric properties in the Iranian population and can be used as a valid tool in the areas of quality assessment of nursing care, education, and nursing research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications for Nursing Practice</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results showed the validity and reliability of the tool and its usability as a valid tool in evaluating the quality of nursing care.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"40-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2047-3095.12413\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2047-3095.12413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:识别和评估护理工作的优缺点以提高护理质量日益受到重视,这需要在该领域使用有效的工具。本研究旨在翻译并确定波斯语版 "良好护理量表"(GNCS-P)的心理测量特性:本研究是一项方法学研究,从 200 名阿尔达比勒医科大学医院住院患者的角度研究了 GNCS-P 的心理测量维度。在翻译了量表的原始版本后,对其有效性和可靠性进行了评估,并使用社会科学统计软件包(16 版)和矩结构分析(24 版)进行了数据分析:结果:在面效度评价中,每个项目的效果得分都高于 2.4。量表的内容效度比为 0.88,内容效度指标工具为 0.86。量表总分与标准量表的相关性为 0.839。因子分析结果显示,各项目因子载荷值介于 0.62 和 0.91 之间,均具有显著性。因此,主工具中引入的七个维度得到了认可。此外,Cronbach's alpha 结果为 0.865,重测相关性为 0.894,这表明问卷具有内部一致性和可接受的稳定性:结论:波斯语版 GNCS-P 在伊朗人群中具有可接受的心理测量特性,可作为护理质量评估、教育和护理研究领域的有效工具:对护理实践的启示:研究结果表明了该工具的有效性和可靠性,以及其作为护理质量评估有效工具的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Translation and psychometrics of the Persian version of the Good Nursing Care Scale in Iran

Background and aim

Identifying and evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of nursing care provided to improve the quality of nursing care is increasingly emphasized, and it requires using valid tools in this field. This study aimed to translate and determine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the “Good Nursing Care Scale” (GNCS-P).

Methods

The present study is a methodological study in which the psychometric dimensions of GNCS-P were studied from the perspective of 200 patients who were admitted to the hospitals of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences. After translating the original version of the scale, its validity and reliability were evaluated and data analysis was performed using statistical package for social science (version 16) and analysis of moment structures (version 24).

Results

The effect score of the item in the evaluation of face validity for each item was above 2.4. The content validity ratio for the scale was 0.88, and the content validity index tool was 0.86. The correlation of total instrument scores with the standard instrument was 0.839. According to the results of factor analysis, the values of factor loading of items were between 0.62 and 0.91, which were all significant. Therefore, the seven dimensions introduced in the main tool were approved. In addition, Cronbach's alpha results of 0.865 and correlation of 0.894 in the test–retest showed that the questionnaire has internal consistency and acceptable stability.

Conclusion

The Persian version of the GNCS-P has acceptable psychometric properties in the Iranian population and can be used as a valid tool in the areas of quality assessment of nursing care, education, and nursing research.

Implications for Nursing Practice

The results showed the validity and reliability of the tool and its usability as a valid tool in evaluating the quality of nursing care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, the official journal of NANDA International, is a peer-reviewed publication for key professionals committed to discovering, understanding and disseminating nursing knowledge. The Journal aims to clarify the knowledge base of nursing and improve patient safety by developing and disseminating nursing diagnoses and standardized nursing languages, and promoting their clinical use. It seeks to encourage education in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and assessment and ensure global consistency in conceptual languages. The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is an essential information resource for healthcare professionals concerned with developing nursing knowledge and /or clinical applications of standardized nursing languages in nursing research, education, practice, and policy. The Journal accepts papers which contribute significantly to international nursing knowledge, including concept analyses, original and applied research, review articles and international and historical perspectives, and welcomes articles discussing clinical challenges and guidelines, education initiatives, and policy initiatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信