对采用不同治疗方式的老年肺癌患者生存率和死亡率的探索性分析

Innovations in Pharmacy Pub Date : 2022-12-12 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v13i2.4346
Abdulmajeed Alotaibi, Askal Ali, Clyde Brown, Fatimah Sherbeny
{"title":"对采用不同治疗方式的老年肺癌患者生存率和死亡率的探索性分析","authors":"Abdulmajeed Alotaibi, Askal Ali, Clyde Brown, Fatimah Sherbeny","doi":"10.24926/iip.v13i2.4346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the impact of different lung cancer treatment modalities on survival time and mortality rates in older patients. <b>Methods:</b> The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify lung cancer patients aged ≥50 years old in the United States. Descriptive statistics and trend charts from 2000 to 2016 were generated. Regression analysis was performed among lung cancer patients to explore the association between survival time and treatment utilization (chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery). A regression model was also applied to explore the association between treatment modalities and odds of dying. <b>Results:</b> A total of 826,217 patients were diagnosed with lung cancer between 2000-2016. The number of lung cancer cases increased by 7%, and the average annual frequency was 48,529 cases per year. Survival, mortality, and treatment utilization varied over the years based on demographic, clinical characteristics, and social status. Five-year survival rate was less than 10% among the study population, and 84% of included lung cancer patients died. Chemotherapy was more commonly used (62%), followed by radiation (35%) and surgical interventions (22%). Chemotherapy and surgery showed a survival advantage. The odds of dying were two times higher among patients treated with surgery than those who were not (OR: 2.62, 95%Cl: 2.58-2.67). <b>Conclusion:</b> This study highlighted the importance of considering treatment modalities and individual patient characteristics, which may impact survival times and mortality rates among older lung cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13646,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in Pharmacy","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/88/35/21550417-13-02-4346.PMC9836744.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploratory Analysis of Survival and Mortality Rates among Older Lung Cancer Patients Utilizing Different Treatment Modalities.\",\"authors\":\"Abdulmajeed Alotaibi, Askal Ali, Clyde Brown, Fatimah Sherbeny\",\"doi\":\"10.24926/iip.v13i2.4346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the impact of different lung cancer treatment modalities on survival time and mortality rates in older patients. <b>Methods:</b> The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify lung cancer patients aged ≥50 years old in the United States. Descriptive statistics and trend charts from 2000 to 2016 were generated. Regression analysis was performed among lung cancer patients to explore the association between survival time and treatment utilization (chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery). A regression model was also applied to explore the association between treatment modalities and odds of dying. <b>Results:</b> A total of 826,217 patients were diagnosed with lung cancer between 2000-2016. The number of lung cancer cases increased by 7%, and the average annual frequency was 48,529 cases per year. Survival, mortality, and treatment utilization varied over the years based on demographic, clinical characteristics, and social status. Five-year survival rate was less than 10% among the study population, and 84% of included lung cancer patients died. Chemotherapy was more commonly used (62%), followed by radiation (35%) and surgical interventions (22%). Chemotherapy and surgery showed a survival advantage. The odds of dying were two times higher among patients treated with surgery than those who were not (OR: 2.62, 95%Cl: 2.58-2.67). <b>Conclusion:</b> This study highlighted the importance of considering treatment modalities and individual patient characteristics, which may impact survival times and mortality rates among older lung cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations in Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/88/35/21550417-13-02-4346.PMC9836744.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations in Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v13i2.4346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v13i2.4346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨不同肺癌治疗方法对老年患者生存时间和死亡率的影响:探讨不同肺癌治疗方式对老年患者生存时间和死亡率的影响。方法使用监测流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库识别美国年龄≥50岁的肺癌患者。生成了 2000 年至 2016 年的描述性统计数字和趋势图。对肺癌患者进行了回归分析,以探讨生存时间与治疗利用率(化疗、放疗和手术)之间的关系。还应用回归模型探讨了治疗方式与死亡几率之间的关系。研究结果2000-2016年间,共有826217名患者被确诊为肺癌。肺癌病例数增加了 7%,年均病例数为 48529 例。根据人口统计学、临床特征和社会地位的不同,多年来的生存率、死亡率和治疗利用率也各不相同。研究人群的五年生存率不到 10%,84% 的肺癌患者死亡。化疗更常用(62%),其次是放疗(35%)和手术治疗(22%)。化疗和手术显示出生存优势。接受手术治疗的患者死亡几率是未接受手术治疗患者的两倍(OR:2.62,95%Cl:2.58-2.67)。结论这项研究强调了考虑治疗方式和患者个体特征的重要性,这可能会影响老年肺癌患者的生存时间和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploratory Analysis of Survival and Mortality Rates among Older Lung Cancer Patients Utilizing Different Treatment Modalities.

Exploratory Analysis of Survival and Mortality Rates among Older Lung Cancer Patients Utilizing Different Treatment Modalities.

Exploratory Analysis of Survival and Mortality Rates among Older Lung Cancer Patients Utilizing Different Treatment Modalities.

Exploratory Analysis of Survival and Mortality Rates among Older Lung Cancer Patients Utilizing Different Treatment Modalities.

Objective: To explore the impact of different lung cancer treatment modalities on survival time and mortality rates in older patients. Methods: The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify lung cancer patients aged ≥50 years old in the United States. Descriptive statistics and trend charts from 2000 to 2016 were generated. Regression analysis was performed among lung cancer patients to explore the association between survival time and treatment utilization (chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery). A regression model was also applied to explore the association between treatment modalities and odds of dying. Results: A total of 826,217 patients were diagnosed with lung cancer between 2000-2016. The number of lung cancer cases increased by 7%, and the average annual frequency was 48,529 cases per year. Survival, mortality, and treatment utilization varied over the years based on demographic, clinical characteristics, and social status. Five-year survival rate was less than 10% among the study population, and 84% of included lung cancer patients died. Chemotherapy was more commonly used (62%), followed by radiation (35%) and surgical interventions (22%). Chemotherapy and surgery showed a survival advantage. The odds of dying were two times higher among patients treated with surgery than those who were not (OR: 2.62, 95%Cl: 2.58-2.67). Conclusion: This study highlighted the importance of considering treatment modalities and individual patient characteristics, which may impact survival times and mortality rates among older lung cancer patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信