基于指南的乳腺癌高危患者的多基因面板生殖系基因检测。

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Hikmat Abdel-Razeq, Lama Abujamous, Khansa Al-Azzam, Hala Abu-Fares, Hira Bani Hani, Mais Alkyam, Baha' Sharaf, Shatha Elemian, Faris Tamimi, Fawzi Abuhijla, Sarah Edaily, Osama Salama, Hazem Abdulelah, Rand Daoud, Mohammad Abubaker, Areej Al-Atary
{"title":"基于指南的乳腺癌高危患者的多基因面板生殖系基因检测。","authors":"Hikmat Abdel-Razeq,&nbsp;Lama Abujamous,&nbsp;Khansa Al-Azzam,&nbsp;Hala Abu-Fares,&nbsp;Hira Bani Hani,&nbsp;Mais Alkyam,&nbsp;Baha' Sharaf,&nbsp;Shatha Elemian,&nbsp;Faris Tamimi,&nbsp;Fawzi Abuhijla,&nbsp;Sarah Edaily,&nbsp;Osama Salama,&nbsp;Hazem Abdulelah,&nbsp;Rand Daoud,&nbsp;Mohammad Abubaker,&nbsp;Areej Al-Atary","doi":"10.2147/BCTT.S394092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genetic testing for at-risk patients with breast cancer should be routinely offered. Knowledge generated may influence both treatment decisions and cancer prevention strategies among the patients themselves and their relatives. In this study, we report on the prevalence and patterns of germline mutations, using commercially available next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based multi-gene panels (MGP).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Consecutive at-risk breast cancer patients, as determined by international guidelines, were offered germline genetic testing using a 20-gene NGS-based panel at a reference lab. Samples of peripheral blood were obtained for DNA extraction and genetic variants were classified as benign/likely benign (negative), pathogenic/likely pathogenic (positive) or variants of uncertain significance (VUS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1310 patients, median age (range) 43 (19-82) years, were enrolled. Age ≤45 years (n = 800, 61.1%) was the most common indication for testing. Positive family history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic or prostate cancers, and triple-negative disease were among the common indications. Among the whole group, 184 (14.0%) patients had pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants; only 90 (48.9%) were in <i>BRCA1</i> or <i>BRCA2</i>, while 94 (51.9%) others had pathogenic variants in other genes; mostly in <i>APC, TP53, CHEK2</i> and <i>PALB2</i>. Mutation rates were significantly higher among patients with positive family history (p = 0.009); especially if they were 50 years or younger at the time of breast cancer diagnosis (p < 0.001). Patients with triple-negative disease had relatively higher rate (17.5%), and mostly in <i>BRCA1/2</i> genes (71.4%). Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were reported in 559 (42.7%) patients; majority (90.7%) were in genes other than <i>BRCA1</i> or <i>BRCA2</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pathogenic mutations in genes other than <i>BRCA1/2</i> are relatively common and could have been missed if genetic testing was restricted to <i>BRCA1/2</i>. The significantly high rate of VUS associated with multi-gene panel testing can be disturbing.</p>","PeriodicalId":9106,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bc/81/bctt-15-1.PMC9844102.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guideline-Based, Multi-Gene Panel Germline Genetic Testing for at-Risk Patients with Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Hikmat Abdel-Razeq,&nbsp;Lama Abujamous,&nbsp;Khansa Al-Azzam,&nbsp;Hala Abu-Fares,&nbsp;Hira Bani Hani,&nbsp;Mais Alkyam,&nbsp;Baha' Sharaf,&nbsp;Shatha Elemian,&nbsp;Faris Tamimi,&nbsp;Fawzi Abuhijla,&nbsp;Sarah Edaily,&nbsp;Osama Salama,&nbsp;Hazem Abdulelah,&nbsp;Rand Daoud,&nbsp;Mohammad Abubaker,&nbsp;Areej Al-Atary\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/BCTT.S394092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genetic testing for at-risk patients with breast cancer should be routinely offered. Knowledge generated may influence both treatment decisions and cancer prevention strategies among the patients themselves and their relatives. In this study, we report on the prevalence and patterns of germline mutations, using commercially available next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based multi-gene panels (MGP).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Consecutive at-risk breast cancer patients, as determined by international guidelines, were offered germline genetic testing using a 20-gene NGS-based panel at a reference lab. Samples of peripheral blood were obtained for DNA extraction and genetic variants were classified as benign/likely benign (negative), pathogenic/likely pathogenic (positive) or variants of uncertain significance (VUS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1310 patients, median age (range) 43 (19-82) years, were enrolled. Age ≤45 years (n = 800, 61.1%) was the most common indication for testing. Positive family history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic or prostate cancers, and triple-negative disease were among the common indications. Among the whole group, 184 (14.0%) patients had pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants; only 90 (48.9%) were in <i>BRCA1</i> or <i>BRCA2</i>, while 94 (51.9%) others had pathogenic variants in other genes; mostly in <i>APC, TP53, CHEK2</i> and <i>PALB2</i>. Mutation rates were significantly higher among patients with positive family history (p = 0.009); especially if they were 50 years or younger at the time of breast cancer diagnosis (p < 0.001). Patients with triple-negative disease had relatively higher rate (17.5%), and mostly in <i>BRCA1/2</i> genes (71.4%). Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were reported in 559 (42.7%) patients; majority (90.7%) were in genes other than <i>BRCA1</i> or <i>BRCA2</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pathogenic mutations in genes other than <i>BRCA1/2</i> are relatively common and could have been missed if genetic testing was restricted to <i>BRCA1/2</i>. The significantly high rate of VUS associated with multi-gene panel testing can be disturbing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bc/81/bctt-15-1.PMC9844102.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S394092\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S394092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:乳腺癌高危患者应常规进行基因检测。所产生的知识可能会影响患者本人及其亲属的治疗决策和癌症预防策略。在这项研究中,我们报告了生殖系突变的患病率和模式,使用市售的基于下一代测序(NGS)的多基因面板(MGP)。患者和方法:根据国际指南确定的连续高危乳腺癌患者,在参考实验室使用基于ngs的20基因小组进行生殖系基因检测。采集外周血样本进行DNA提取,将遗传变异分为良性/可能良性(阴性)、致病性/可能致病性(阳性)或意义不确定的变异(VUS)。结果:共纳入1310例患者,中位年龄(范围)43(19-82)岁。年龄≤45岁(n = 800, 61.1%)是最常见的检测指征。乳腺癌、卵巢癌、胰腺癌或前列腺癌的阳性家族史以及三阴性疾病是常见的适应症。在整个组中,184例(14.0%)患者存在致病性/可能致病性变异;BRCA1或BRCA2基因只有90例(48.9%),其他94例(51.9%)存在其他基因的致病变异;以APC、TP53、CHEK2和PALB2为主。家族史阳性患者的突变率显著高于对照组(p = 0.009);特别是当他们在乳腺癌诊断时年龄在50岁或以下时(p < 0.001)。三阴性患者的发病率相对较高(17.5%),且以BRCA1/2基因为主(71.4%)。559例(42.7%)患者报告了不确定意义变异(VUS);大多数(90.7%)是BRCA1或BRCA2以外的基因。结论:BRCA1/2以外基因的致病性突变相对常见,如果基因检测仅限于BRCA1/2,可能会被遗漏。与多基因面板检测相关的显著高VUS率可能令人不安。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Guideline-Based, Multi-Gene Panel Germline Genetic Testing for at-Risk Patients with Breast Cancer.

Guideline-Based, Multi-Gene Panel Germline Genetic Testing for at-Risk Patients with Breast Cancer.

Guideline-Based, Multi-Gene Panel Germline Genetic Testing for at-Risk Patients with Breast Cancer.

Guideline-Based, Multi-Gene Panel Germline Genetic Testing for at-Risk Patients with Breast Cancer.

Background: Genetic testing for at-risk patients with breast cancer should be routinely offered. Knowledge generated may influence both treatment decisions and cancer prevention strategies among the patients themselves and their relatives. In this study, we report on the prevalence and patterns of germline mutations, using commercially available next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based multi-gene panels (MGP).

Patients and methods: Consecutive at-risk breast cancer patients, as determined by international guidelines, were offered germline genetic testing using a 20-gene NGS-based panel at a reference lab. Samples of peripheral blood were obtained for DNA extraction and genetic variants were classified as benign/likely benign (negative), pathogenic/likely pathogenic (positive) or variants of uncertain significance (VUS).

Results: A total of 1310 patients, median age (range) 43 (19-82) years, were enrolled. Age ≤45 years (n = 800, 61.1%) was the most common indication for testing. Positive family history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic or prostate cancers, and triple-negative disease were among the common indications. Among the whole group, 184 (14.0%) patients had pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants; only 90 (48.9%) were in BRCA1 or BRCA2, while 94 (51.9%) others had pathogenic variants in other genes; mostly in APC, TP53, CHEK2 and PALB2. Mutation rates were significantly higher among patients with positive family history (p = 0.009); especially if they were 50 years or younger at the time of breast cancer diagnosis (p < 0.001). Patients with triple-negative disease had relatively higher rate (17.5%), and mostly in BRCA1/2 genes (71.4%). Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were reported in 559 (42.7%) patients; majority (90.7%) were in genes other than BRCA1 or BRCA2.

Conclusion: Pathogenic mutations in genes other than BRCA1/2 are relatively common and could have been missed if genetic testing was restricted to BRCA1/2. The significantly high rate of VUS associated with multi-gene panel testing can be disturbing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信