输尿管外支架与肾移植内双J支架:泌尿系统并发症和尿路感染发生率的回顾性分析。

Ietje T Hazenberg, Stephanie J M Middelkoop, Anoek A E de Joode, Juliette D Rabbeljee, Robert A Pol, Benjamin H J Doornweerd, Jan-Stephan F Sanders, Coen A Stegeman
{"title":"输尿管外支架与肾移植内双J支架:泌尿系统并发症和尿路感染发生率的回顾性分析。","authors":"Ietje T Hazenberg,&nbsp;Stephanie J M Middelkoop,&nbsp;Anoek A E de Joode,&nbsp;Juliette D Rabbeljee,&nbsp;Robert A Pol,&nbsp;Benjamin H J Doornweerd,&nbsp;Jan-Stephan F Sanders,&nbsp;Coen A Stegeman","doi":"10.3389/fneph.2023.1130672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Urologic complications (UCs) and urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common after kidney transplantation. Intraoperative stent placement at the vesicoureteric anastomosis reduces UC risk, but increases UTI risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2014 our stenting protocol changed from external ureteric stent (ES) to internal double J stent (DJ). We retrospectively studied the occurrence of UCs and UTIs in relation to ES or DJ in 697 kidney recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An ES was used in 403 patients (57.8%), in 294 (42.2%) a DJ. ES was removed 7-12 days and DJ 3-4 weeks post-operative. Induction immunosuppression was the same in both groups. Primary outcomes at 6 months follow-up were UC (urinary leakage/ureter stenosis) and UTI; they were related to stenting procedure and clinical and transplant characteristics. The incidence of UCs was similar for ES (8.4%) and DJ (6.8%), p=0.389. ES use was a significant risk factor for UTI (OR 1.69 (1.15-2.50), p=0.008). Post-transplant hospitalization was significantly shorter in the DJ group. Despite more acute rejection episodes with ES (ES/DJ: 16.4%/6.1%, p<0.001), no clinical relevant differences in graft outcomes existed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A DJ is, compared to ES, associated with a lower incidence of UTIs and comparable occurrence of UCs and is therefore the preferred technique for stenting the vesicoureteric anastomosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":73091,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in nephrology","volume":"3 ","pages":"1130672"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10479681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External ureteric stent versus internal double J stent in kidney transplantation: a retrospective analysis on the incidence of urological complications and urinary tract infections.\",\"authors\":\"Ietje T Hazenberg,&nbsp;Stephanie J M Middelkoop,&nbsp;Anoek A E de Joode,&nbsp;Juliette D Rabbeljee,&nbsp;Robert A Pol,&nbsp;Benjamin H J Doornweerd,&nbsp;Jan-Stephan F Sanders,&nbsp;Coen A Stegeman\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fneph.2023.1130672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Urologic complications (UCs) and urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common after kidney transplantation. Intraoperative stent placement at the vesicoureteric anastomosis reduces UC risk, but increases UTI risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2014 our stenting protocol changed from external ureteric stent (ES) to internal double J stent (DJ). We retrospectively studied the occurrence of UCs and UTIs in relation to ES or DJ in 697 kidney recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An ES was used in 403 patients (57.8%), in 294 (42.2%) a DJ. ES was removed 7-12 days and DJ 3-4 weeks post-operative. Induction immunosuppression was the same in both groups. Primary outcomes at 6 months follow-up were UC (urinary leakage/ureter stenosis) and UTI; they were related to stenting procedure and clinical and transplant characteristics. The incidence of UCs was similar for ES (8.4%) and DJ (6.8%), p=0.389. ES use was a significant risk factor for UTI (OR 1.69 (1.15-2.50), p=0.008). Post-transplant hospitalization was significantly shorter in the DJ group. Despite more acute rejection episodes with ES (ES/DJ: 16.4%/6.1%, p<0.001), no clinical relevant differences in graft outcomes existed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A DJ is, compared to ES, associated with a lower incidence of UTIs and comparable occurrence of UCs and is therefore the preferred technique for stenting the vesicoureteric anastomosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in nephrology\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"1130672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10479681/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneph.2023.1130672\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneph.2023.1130672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肾移植术后泌尿系统并发症(UCs)和尿路感染(uti)很常见。术中膀胱输尿管吻合处放置支架可降低UC风险,但增加UTI风险。方法:2014年,我们将输尿管外支架(ES)改为输尿管内双J型支架(DJ)。我们回顾性研究了697例肾受者与ES或DJ相关的UCs和UTIs的发生情况。方法:403例(57.8%)采用ES, 294例(42.2%)采用DJ。术后7-12天切除ES, 3-4周切除DJ。两组诱导免疫抑制相同。6个月随访时的主要结局为UC(尿漏/输尿管狭窄)和UTI;它们与支架植入术、临床和移植特征有关。ES(8.4%)和DJ(6.8%)的UCs发生率相似,p=0.389。使用ES是UTI的重要危险因素(OR 1.69 (1.15-2.50), p=0.008)。DJ组移植后住院时间明显缩短。尽管ES的急性排斥反应发生率更高(ES/DJ: 16.4%/6.1%),但与ES相比,DJ与尿路感染发生率较低和UCs发生率相当相关,因此是膀胱输尿管吻合术支架置入的首选技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

External ureteric stent versus internal double J stent in kidney transplantation: a retrospective analysis on the incidence of urological complications and urinary tract infections.

External ureteric stent versus internal double J stent in kidney transplantation: a retrospective analysis on the incidence of urological complications and urinary tract infections.

External ureteric stent versus internal double J stent in kidney transplantation: a retrospective analysis on the incidence of urological complications and urinary tract infections.

Introduction: Urologic complications (UCs) and urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common after kidney transplantation. Intraoperative stent placement at the vesicoureteric anastomosis reduces UC risk, but increases UTI risk.

Methods: In 2014 our stenting protocol changed from external ureteric stent (ES) to internal double J stent (DJ). We retrospectively studied the occurrence of UCs and UTIs in relation to ES or DJ in 697 kidney recipients.

Methods: An ES was used in 403 patients (57.8%), in 294 (42.2%) a DJ. ES was removed 7-12 days and DJ 3-4 weeks post-operative. Induction immunosuppression was the same in both groups. Primary outcomes at 6 months follow-up were UC (urinary leakage/ureter stenosis) and UTI; they were related to stenting procedure and clinical and transplant characteristics. The incidence of UCs was similar for ES (8.4%) and DJ (6.8%), p=0.389. ES use was a significant risk factor for UTI (OR 1.69 (1.15-2.50), p=0.008). Post-transplant hospitalization was significantly shorter in the DJ group. Despite more acute rejection episodes with ES (ES/DJ: 16.4%/6.1%, p<0.001), no clinical relevant differences in graft outcomes existed.

Discussion: A DJ is, compared to ES, associated with a lower incidence of UTIs and comparable occurrence of UCs and is therefore the preferred technique for stenting the vesicoureteric anastomosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信