卒中患者家庭血压测量教育项目的效果:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shingo Kishita, Takeshi Hyakuta
{"title":"卒中患者家庭血压测量教育项目的效果:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Shingo Kishita,&nbsp;Takeshi Hyakuta","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND : Stroke patients must review their previous lifestyle and take daily actions to control risk factors for recurrence. METHODS : A nonblind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in stroke patients to determine whether an education program intervention would alter behavior concerning home blood pressure measurements. This prospective, randomized controlled trial recruited 48 inpatients with stroke randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 24) or a usual care group (n = 24). The intervention involved 5 face-to-face support or telephone support sessions over 6 months to provide information regarding home blood pressure measurements and to confirm patient behavior using a textbook, a blood pressure recording form, and a blood pressure measurement device. RESULTS : There were no significant differences at baseline between the intervention and usual care groups. The median rate of performing home blood pressure measurements at 12 months was significantly higher in the intervention group (100.0% [99.1%-100.0%], n = 24) than the control group (62.5% [27.7%-87.5%], n = 24) ( P < .001). The rates of home blood pressure measurements (at 1, 3, and 7 months after registration) were also significantly higher in the intervention group. Seven months after registration, home blood pressure values (systolic blood pressure) were significantly lower in the intervention group than the control group ( P = .025). In contrast, there was no significant difference at 1, 3, or 12 months after registration. CONCLUSION : Our results suggest that although the rate of home blood pressure measurements in both groups decreased, the rate was higher in the intervention group compared with the usual care group, indicating that the intervention was effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":50113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","volume":"55 1","pages":"4-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of an Education Program for Home Blood Pressure Measurements in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Shingo Kishita,&nbsp;Takeshi Hyakuta\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND : Stroke patients must review their previous lifestyle and take daily actions to control risk factors for recurrence. METHODS : A nonblind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in stroke patients to determine whether an education program intervention would alter behavior concerning home blood pressure measurements. This prospective, randomized controlled trial recruited 48 inpatients with stroke randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 24) or a usual care group (n = 24). The intervention involved 5 face-to-face support or telephone support sessions over 6 months to provide information regarding home blood pressure measurements and to confirm patient behavior using a textbook, a blood pressure recording form, and a blood pressure measurement device. RESULTS : There were no significant differences at baseline between the intervention and usual care groups. The median rate of performing home blood pressure measurements at 12 months was significantly higher in the intervention group (100.0% [99.1%-100.0%], n = 24) than the control group (62.5% [27.7%-87.5%], n = 24) ( P < .001). The rates of home blood pressure measurements (at 1, 3, and 7 months after registration) were also significantly higher in the intervention group. Seven months after registration, home blood pressure values (systolic blood pressure) were significantly lower in the intervention group than the control group ( P = .025). In contrast, there was no significant difference at 1, 3, or 12 months after registration. CONCLUSION : Our results suggest that although the rate of home blood pressure measurements in both groups decreased, the rate was higher in the intervention group compared with the usual care group, indicating that the intervention was effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"4-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000681\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000681","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:背景:脑卒中患者必须回顾其既往生活方式,并采取日常行动控制复发危险因素。方法:在脑卒中患者中进行了一项非盲、随机对照试验,以确定教育计划干预是否会改变家庭血压测量的行为。这项前瞻性、随机对照试验招募了48名住院卒中患者,随机分为干预组(n = 24)和常规护理组(n = 24)。干预包括5次面对面支持或电话支持会议,为期6个月,提供有关家庭血压测量的信息,并使用教科书、血压记录表和血压测量设备确认患者的行为。结果:干预组和常规护理组在基线时无显著差异。干预组12个月在家测血压的中位率(100.0% [99.1% ~ 100.0%],n = 24)显著高于对照组(62.5% [27.7% ~ 87.5%],n = 24) (P < .001)。干预组的家庭血压测量率(在登记后1、3和7个月)也明显更高。登记7个月后,干预组家庭血压值(收缩压)显著低于对照组(P = 0.025)。相比之下,在注册后1、3或12个月无显著差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,虽然两组患者的家庭血压测量率都有所下降,但干预组的家庭血压测量率高于常规护理组,表明干预是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of an Education Program for Home Blood Pressure Measurements in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Abstract: BACKGROUND : Stroke patients must review their previous lifestyle and take daily actions to control risk factors for recurrence. METHODS : A nonblind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in stroke patients to determine whether an education program intervention would alter behavior concerning home blood pressure measurements. This prospective, randomized controlled trial recruited 48 inpatients with stroke randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 24) or a usual care group (n = 24). The intervention involved 5 face-to-face support or telephone support sessions over 6 months to provide information regarding home blood pressure measurements and to confirm patient behavior using a textbook, a blood pressure recording form, and a blood pressure measurement device. RESULTS : There were no significant differences at baseline between the intervention and usual care groups. The median rate of performing home blood pressure measurements at 12 months was significantly higher in the intervention group (100.0% [99.1%-100.0%], n = 24) than the control group (62.5% [27.7%-87.5%], n = 24) ( P < .001). The rates of home blood pressure measurements (at 1, 3, and 7 months after registration) were also significantly higher in the intervention group. Seven months after registration, home blood pressure values (systolic blood pressure) were significantly lower in the intervention group than the control group ( P = .025). In contrast, there was no significant difference at 1, 3, or 12 months after registration. CONCLUSION : Our results suggest that although the rate of home blood pressure measurements in both groups decreased, the rate was higher in the intervention group compared with the usual care group, indicating that the intervention was effective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
30.40%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing (JNN), the official journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, contains original articles on advances in neurosurgical and neurological techniques as they affect nursing care, theory and research, as well as commentary on the roles of the neuroscience nurse in the health care team. The journal provides information to nurses and health care professionals working in diverse areas of neuroscience patient care such as multi-specialty and neuroscience intensive care units, general neuroscience units, combination units (neuro/ortho, neuromuscular/rehabilitation, neuropsychiatry, neurogerontology), rehabilitation units, medical-surgical units, pediatric units, emergency and trauma departments, and surgery. The information is applicable to professionals working in clinical, research, administrative, and educational settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信