乳腺癌团队中多学科医疗保健提供者肿瘤生育障碍评估工具的开发和有效性测试

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Sheng-Miauh Huang, Jerry Cheng-Yen Lai, Chin-Ching Li, Ping-Ho Chen, Pei-Ju Lien, Ching-Ting Lien
{"title":"乳腺癌团队中多学科医疗保健提供者肿瘤生育障碍评估工具的开发和有效性测试","authors":"Sheng-Miauh Huang,&nbsp;Jerry Cheng-Yen Lai,&nbsp;Chin-Ching Li,&nbsp;Ping-Ho Chen,&nbsp;Pei-Ju Lien,&nbsp;Ching-Ting Lien","doi":"10.1097/jnr.0000000000000479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multidisciplinary healthcare providers, especially clinical nurses, lack a valid tool to assess the comprehensive barriers affecting oncofertility care in breast cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aims of the research were to develop a self-assessment scale on oncofertility barriers and test its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a methodological study. The initial 36 items of the developed Oncofertility Barrier Scale (OBS) were generated through qualitative study and a review of the literature. This scale was further refined using expert validity (n = 10), face validity (n = 10), and item analysis (n = 184). Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis factoring and direct oblimin rotation was used to determine the construct validity. The reliability of the OBS was evaluated using internal consistency and test-retest analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean item-level and scale-level content validity indices of the initial OBS were higher than .96. The data were shown to be feasible for the factor analysis, and a six-factor solution was chosen that accounted for approximately 57.6% of the total variance. These factors included (a) lack of information and education, (b) rigid thinking toward oncofertility care, (c) cancer patient stereotypes, (d) fertility risk, (e) insufficient support, and (f) interrupted oncofertility care. The Cronbach's alpha of the 27-item OBS was .91, and the test-retest reliability coefficient was .55.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications for practice: </strong>The final version of the developed OBS has acceptable reliability, content validity, and construct validity. This scale is appropriate for use in research and clinical practice settings to identify the barriers to fertility cancer care that should be resolved by the breast cancer care team.</p>","PeriodicalId":49158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Research","volume":"30 2","pages":"e195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validity Testing of an Assessment Tool for Oncofertility Barriers in Multidisciplinary Healthcare Providers on the Breast Cancer Team.\",\"authors\":\"Sheng-Miauh Huang,&nbsp;Jerry Cheng-Yen Lai,&nbsp;Chin-Ching Li,&nbsp;Ping-Ho Chen,&nbsp;Pei-Ju Lien,&nbsp;Ching-Ting Lien\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/jnr.0000000000000479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multidisciplinary healthcare providers, especially clinical nurses, lack a valid tool to assess the comprehensive barriers affecting oncofertility care in breast cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aims of the research were to develop a self-assessment scale on oncofertility barriers and test its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a methodological study. The initial 36 items of the developed Oncofertility Barrier Scale (OBS) were generated through qualitative study and a review of the literature. This scale was further refined using expert validity (n = 10), face validity (n = 10), and item analysis (n = 184). Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis factoring and direct oblimin rotation was used to determine the construct validity. The reliability of the OBS was evaluated using internal consistency and test-retest analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean item-level and scale-level content validity indices of the initial OBS were higher than .96. The data were shown to be feasible for the factor analysis, and a six-factor solution was chosen that accounted for approximately 57.6% of the total variance. These factors included (a) lack of information and education, (b) rigid thinking toward oncofertility care, (c) cancer patient stereotypes, (d) fertility risk, (e) insufficient support, and (f) interrupted oncofertility care. The Cronbach's alpha of the 27-item OBS was .91, and the test-retest reliability coefficient was .55.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications for practice: </strong>The final version of the developed OBS has acceptable reliability, content validity, and construct validity. This scale is appropriate for use in research and clinical practice settings to identify the barriers to fertility cancer care that should be resolved by the breast cancer care team.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"e195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000479\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000479","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:多学科医疗保健提供者,特别是临床护士,缺乏有效的工具来评估乳腺癌治疗中影响肿瘤生育护理的综合障碍。目的:编制生育障碍自评量表,并对其效度和信度进行检验。方法:采用方法学研究。通过定性研究和文献回顾,编制了已开发的肿瘤生育障碍量表(OBS)的最初36个项目。采用专家效度(n = 10)、面效度(n = 10)和项目分析(n = 184)进一步完善该量表。探索性因子分析采用主轴因子分解和直接模糊旋转来确定构念效度。使用内部一致性和重测分析评估OBS的可靠性。结果:初始OBS的项目水平和量表水平的平均内容效度指数均大于0.96。结果表明,该数据对因子分析是可行的,并选择了一个六因子解决方案,占总方差的约57.6%。这些因素包括(a)缺乏信息和教育,(b)对不孕不育护理的僵化思维,(c)癌症患者的刻板印象,(d)生育风险,(e)支持不足,以及(f)不孕不育护理中断。27项工作问卷的Cronbach’s alpha为0.91,重测信度系数为0.55。结论/对实践的启示:开发的OBS最终版本具有可接受的信度、内容效度和结构效度。该量表适用于研究和临床实践环境,以确定乳腺癌护理团队应解决的生育癌症护理障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validity Testing of an Assessment Tool for Oncofertility Barriers in Multidisciplinary Healthcare Providers on the Breast Cancer Team.

Background: Multidisciplinary healthcare providers, especially clinical nurses, lack a valid tool to assess the comprehensive barriers affecting oncofertility care in breast cancer treatment.

Purpose: The aims of the research were to develop a self-assessment scale on oncofertility barriers and test its validity and reliability.

Methods: This was a methodological study. The initial 36 items of the developed Oncofertility Barrier Scale (OBS) were generated through qualitative study and a review of the literature. This scale was further refined using expert validity (n = 10), face validity (n = 10), and item analysis (n = 184). Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis factoring and direct oblimin rotation was used to determine the construct validity. The reliability of the OBS was evaluated using internal consistency and test-retest analyses.

Results: The mean item-level and scale-level content validity indices of the initial OBS were higher than .96. The data were shown to be feasible for the factor analysis, and a six-factor solution was chosen that accounted for approximately 57.6% of the total variance. These factors included (a) lack of information and education, (b) rigid thinking toward oncofertility care, (c) cancer patient stereotypes, (d) fertility risk, (e) insufficient support, and (f) interrupted oncofertility care. The Cronbach's alpha of the 27-item OBS was .91, and the test-retest reliability coefficient was .55.

Conclusions/implications for practice: The final version of the developed OBS has acceptable reliability, content validity, and construct validity. This scale is appropriate for use in research and clinical practice settings to identify the barriers to fertility cancer care that should be resolved by the breast cancer care team.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Journal of Nursing Research (JNR) is comprised of original articles that come from a variety of national and international institutions and reflect trends and issues of contemporary nursing practice in Taiwan. All articles are published in English so that JNR can better serve the whole nursing profession and introduce nursing in Taiwan to people around the world. Topics cover not only the field of nursing but also related fields such as psychology, education, management and statistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信