量化脑震荡患者的恐惧回避行为:一项基于cosmin的系统评价。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Liam J Sherwood, Vasileios Korakakis, Andrea B Mosler, Lauren Fortington, Myles C Murphy
{"title":"量化脑震荡患者的恐惧回避行为:一项基于cosmin的系统评价。","authors":"Liam J Sherwood, Vasileios Korakakis, Andrea B Mosler, Lauren Fortington, Myles C Murphy","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> The validity of existing fear avoidance behavior patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for concussion is unknown. This study aims to (1) identify PROMs that assess fear avoidance behavior in individuals with concussion and (2) assess the measurement properties of these PROMs. <b>DESIGN:</b> A systematic review of outcome measurement instruments using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> We performed a systematic search of 7 databases. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> Studies were included if they assessed fear avoidance behavior (eg, kinesiophobia or cogniphobia) in participants with concussion, occurring in all settings (eg, sport, falls, assaults). <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> Methodological quality of the PROMs was assessed using the COSMIN checklist, and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. <b>RESULTS:</b> We identified 40 studies assessing fear avoidance. Four studies (n = 875 participants, representing 3 PROMs) were eligible for COSMIN assessment. Content validity for all PROMs was insufficient due to extreme risk of bias. The Fear Avoidance Short Form Scale demonstrated the greatest validity: moderate-certainty evidence for sufficient structural validity and internal consistency, and low-certainty evidence for measurement invariance. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Current PROMs for measuring fear avoidance behaviors in people with concussion have insufficient content validity and should be used with caution in research and clinical practice. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(9):540-565. Epub: 10 August 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11685</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Fear Avoidance Behaviors in People With Concussion: A COSMIN-Informed Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Liam J Sherwood, Vasileios Korakakis, Andrea B Mosler, Lauren Fortington, Myles C Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.2519/jospt.2023.11685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> The validity of existing fear avoidance behavior patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for concussion is unknown. This study aims to (1) identify PROMs that assess fear avoidance behavior in individuals with concussion and (2) assess the measurement properties of these PROMs. <b>DESIGN:</b> A systematic review of outcome measurement instruments using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> We performed a systematic search of 7 databases. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> Studies were included if they assessed fear avoidance behavior (eg, kinesiophobia or cogniphobia) in participants with concussion, occurring in all settings (eg, sport, falls, assaults). <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> Methodological quality of the PROMs was assessed using the COSMIN checklist, and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. <b>RESULTS:</b> We identified 40 studies assessing fear avoidance. Four studies (n = 875 participants, representing 3 PROMs) were eligible for COSMIN assessment. Content validity for all PROMs was insufficient due to extreme risk of bias. The Fear Avoidance Short Form Scale demonstrated the greatest validity: moderate-certainty evidence for sufficient structural validity and internal consistency, and low-certainty evidence for measurement invariance. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Current PROMs for measuring fear avoidance behaviors in people with concussion have insufficient content validity and should be used with caution in research and clinical practice. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(9):540-565. Epub: 10 August 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11685</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2023.11685\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2023.11685","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:现有的恐惧回避行为患者报告结果测量(PROMs)对脑震荡的有效性尚不清楚。本研究旨在(1)识别评估脑震荡患者恐惧回避行为的预估量表,(2)评估这些预估量表的测量特性。设计:使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)清单对结果测量工具进行系统评价。文献检索:我们对7个数据库进行了系统检索。研究选择标准:如果研究评估了脑震荡参与者的恐惧回避行为(例如,运动恐惧症或认知恐惧症),则纳入研究,这些行为发生在所有环境中(例如,运动,跌倒,攻击)。数据综合:使用COSMIN检查表评估PROMs的方法学质量,使用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)方法评估证据的确定性。结果:我们确定了40项评估恐惧回避的研究。四项研究(n = 875名参与者,代表3个prom)符合COSMIN评估的条件。由于极端的偏倚风险,所有prom的内容效度都不足。恐惧回避短表显示出最大的效度:中等确定性证据证明足够的结构效度和内部一致性,低确定性证据证明测量不变性。结论:目前用于测量脑震荡患者恐惧回避行为的问卷存在内容效度不足的问题,在研究和临床实践中应谨慎使用。[J] .中华体育杂志,2013;33(9):564 - 564。Epub: 2023年8月10日。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2023.11685。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying Fear Avoidance Behaviors in People With Concussion: A COSMIN-Informed Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The validity of existing fear avoidance behavior patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for concussion is unknown. This study aims to (1) identify PROMs that assess fear avoidance behavior in individuals with concussion and (2) assess the measurement properties of these PROMs. DESIGN: A systematic review of outcome measurement instruments using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. LITERATURE SEARCH: We performed a systematic search of 7 databases. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were included if they assessed fear avoidance behavior (eg, kinesiophobia or cogniphobia) in participants with concussion, occurring in all settings (eg, sport, falls, assaults). DATA SYNTHESIS: Methodological quality of the PROMs was assessed using the COSMIN checklist, and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: We identified 40 studies assessing fear avoidance. Four studies (n = 875 participants, representing 3 PROMs) were eligible for COSMIN assessment. Content validity for all PROMs was insufficient due to extreme risk of bias. The Fear Avoidance Short Form Scale demonstrated the greatest validity: moderate-certainty evidence for sufficient structural validity and internal consistency, and low-certainty evidence for measurement invariance. CONCLUSION: Current PROMs for measuring fear avoidance behaviors in people with concussion have insufficient content validity and should be used with caution in research and clinical practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(9):540-565. Epub: 10 August 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11685.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信