Manisha Verma, Radi Zaki, Johnathan Sadeh, John P Knorr, Mark Gallagher, Afshin Parsikia, Victor Navarro
{"title":"肝移植受者使用缓释他克莫司改善药物依从性:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Manisha Verma, Radi Zaki, Johnathan Sadeh, John P Knorr, Mark Gallagher, Afshin Parsikia, Victor Navarro","doi":"10.1155/2023/7915781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonadherence to immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients (LTRs) leads to deterioration in health outcomes. Once-dailyextended-release tacrolimus (TAC-ER) may improve adherence when compared to twice-dailyimmediate-release tacrolimus (TAC-IR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled study to evaluate medication adherence, clinical efficacy, and safety of TAC-ER in stable LTR. All patients >18 years who underwent liver transplantation before 6 months were eligible. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to continued TAC-IR or conversion to TAC-ER. The primary outcome was change in medication adherence from baseline to 9 months, assessed using BAASIS. Secondary outcomes were tacrolimus trough levels, safety, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one patients were consented and randomized to either of the two groups: conversion to TAC-ER (<i>n</i> = 15) or continued TAC-IR (<i>n</i> = 16). Six patients in the TAC-ER group withdrew after randomization due to apprehension about switching medication (<i>n</i> = 2), unwillingness to travel (<i>n</i> = 2), and increased liver tests after conversion (<i>n</i> = 2, both were acute rejections despite therapeutic tacrolimus levels and were considered unrelated to TAC-ER). We compared the results of nine patients in the TAC-ER group that completed the study with those of sixteen in the TAC-IR group. At baseline, there was no difference in tacrolimus trough levels between groups. Improved adherence was observed in the TAC-ER group as 100% of patients reported at least one period of full adherence during the study period (100% vs. 62.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.035). Tacrolimus trough levels and liver tests were comparable between groups throughout the study. There were no differences in eGFR, HbA1c, or QoL between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TAC-ER improved medication adherence while maintaining comparable trough levels, liver function, and QoL as TAC-IR in LTR.</p>","PeriodicalId":45795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9833930/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Medication Adherence with the Use of Extended-Release Tacrolimus in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Manisha Verma, Radi Zaki, Johnathan Sadeh, John P Knorr, Mark Gallagher, Afshin Parsikia, Victor Navarro\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/7915781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonadherence to immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients (LTRs) leads to deterioration in health outcomes. Once-dailyextended-release tacrolimus (TAC-ER) may improve adherence when compared to twice-dailyimmediate-release tacrolimus (TAC-IR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled study to evaluate medication adherence, clinical efficacy, and safety of TAC-ER in stable LTR. All patients >18 years who underwent liver transplantation before 6 months were eligible. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to continued TAC-IR or conversion to TAC-ER. The primary outcome was change in medication adherence from baseline to 9 months, assessed using BAASIS. Secondary outcomes were tacrolimus trough levels, safety, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one patients were consented and randomized to either of the two groups: conversion to TAC-ER (<i>n</i> = 15) or continued TAC-IR (<i>n</i> = 16). Six patients in the TAC-ER group withdrew after randomization due to apprehension about switching medication (<i>n</i> = 2), unwillingness to travel (<i>n</i> = 2), and increased liver tests after conversion (<i>n</i> = 2, both were acute rejections despite therapeutic tacrolimus levels and were considered unrelated to TAC-ER). We compared the results of nine patients in the TAC-ER group that completed the study with those of sixteen in the TAC-IR group. At baseline, there was no difference in tacrolimus trough levels between groups. Improved adherence was observed in the TAC-ER group as 100% of patients reported at least one period of full adherence during the study period (100% vs. 62.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.035). Tacrolimus trough levels and liver tests were comparable between groups throughout the study. There were no differences in eGFR, HbA1c, or QoL between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TAC-ER improved medication adherence while maintaining comparable trough levels, liver function, and QoL as TAC-IR in LTR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9833930/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7915781\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7915781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景:肝移植受者(LTRs)不坚持免疫抑制导致健康结果恶化。与每日两次速释他克莫司(TAC-IR)相比,每日一次缓释他克莫司(TAC-ER)可改善依从性。方法:采用随机对照研究,评价TAC-ER在稳定型LTR中的用药依从性、临床疗效和安全性,纳入年龄>18岁且6个月前行肝移植的患者。患者以1:1的比例随机分配到持续的TAC-IR或转换到TAC-ER。主要结局是用药依从性从基线到9个月的变化,使用basis进行评估。次要结局是他克莫司的低谷水平、安全性和生活质量。结果:31名患者被同意并随机分为两组:转入TAC-ER (n = 15)或继续TAC-IR (n = 16)。TAC-ER组中6例患者在随机分组后退出,原因是担心转换药物(n = 2),不愿意旅行(n = 2),转换后肝脏检查增加(n = 2,尽管治疗性他克莫司水平,但均为急性排斥反应,被认为与TAC-ER无关)。我们比较了完成研究的9名TAC-ER组患者和16名TAC-IR组患者的结果。基线时,两组间他克莫司谷底水平无差异。TAC-ER组的依从性得到改善,100%的患者报告在研究期间至少有一段时间完全依从(100% vs. 62.6%, p = 0.035)。在整个研究过程中,两组之间的他克莫司谷水平和肝脏测试具有可比性。两组间eGFR、HbA1c和生活质量均无差异。结论:与TAC-IR相比,TAC-ER改善了药物依从性,同时维持了相当的低谷水平、肝功能和生活质量。
Improved Medication Adherence with the Use of Extended-Release Tacrolimus in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Background: Nonadherence to immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients (LTRs) leads to deterioration in health outcomes. Once-dailyextended-release tacrolimus (TAC-ER) may improve adherence when compared to twice-dailyimmediate-release tacrolimus (TAC-IR).
Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled study to evaluate medication adherence, clinical efficacy, and safety of TAC-ER in stable LTR. All patients >18 years who underwent liver transplantation before 6 months were eligible. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to continued TAC-IR or conversion to TAC-ER. The primary outcome was change in medication adherence from baseline to 9 months, assessed using BAASIS. Secondary outcomes were tacrolimus trough levels, safety, and quality of life.
Results: Thirty-one patients were consented and randomized to either of the two groups: conversion to TAC-ER (n = 15) or continued TAC-IR (n = 16). Six patients in the TAC-ER group withdrew after randomization due to apprehension about switching medication (n = 2), unwillingness to travel (n = 2), and increased liver tests after conversion (n = 2, both were acute rejections despite therapeutic tacrolimus levels and were considered unrelated to TAC-ER). We compared the results of nine patients in the TAC-ER group that completed the study with those of sixteen in the TAC-IR group. At baseline, there was no difference in tacrolimus trough levels between groups. Improved adherence was observed in the TAC-ER group as 100% of patients reported at least one period of full adherence during the study period (100% vs. 62.6%, p = 0.035). Tacrolimus trough levels and liver tests were comparable between groups throughout the study. There were no differences in eGFR, HbA1c, or QoL between the groups.
Conclusion: TAC-ER improved medication adherence while maintaining comparable trough levels, liver function, and QoL as TAC-IR in LTR.