免疫抑制药物治疗的异体肾移植失败患者感染的危险因素。

Lauren Ogawa, Omer E Beaird, Joanna M Schaenman
{"title":"免疫抑制药物治疗的异体肾移植失败患者感染的危险因素。","authors":"Lauren Ogawa,&nbsp;Omer E Beaird,&nbsp;Joanna M Schaenman","doi":"10.3389/fneph.2023.1149116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with a failing kidney allograft are often continued on immunosuppression (IS) to preserve residual kidney function and prevent allosensitization. It has been previously accepted that maintaining patients on immunosuppressive therapy results in an increased risk of infection, hospitalization, and mortality. However, as the management of IS in patients with a failed kidney allograft continues to evolve, it is important to review the data regarding associations between infection and specific immunosuppression regimens. We present a review of the literature of failed kidney allograft management and infection risk, and discuss practices for infection prevention. Fifteen studies, published from 1995 to 2022, which investigated the experience of patients with failed allograft and infection, were identified. Infection was most commonly documented as a general event, but when specified, included infections caused by <i>Candida</i>, <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>, and <i>Aspergillus.</i> In addition, the definition of reduced \"IS\" varied from decreased doses of a triple drug regimen to monotherapy, whereas others did not specify which medications patients were receiving. Despite attempts at lowering net immunosuppression, patients with failed allografts remain at risk of acquiring opportunistic and non-opportunistic infections. Although opportunistic infections secondary to IS are expected, somewhat surprisingly, it appears that the greatest risk of infection may be related to complications of dialysis. Therefore, mitigating strategies, such as planning for an arteriovenous (AV) fistula over a hemodialysis catheter placement, may reduce infection risk. Additional studies are needed to provide more information regarding the types and timing of infection in the setting of a failed kidney allograft. In addition, more data are needed regarding specific medications, doses, and timing of taper of IS to guide future patient management and inform strategies for infection surveillance and prophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":73091,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in nephrology","volume":"3 ","pages":"1149116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10479655/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for infection in patients with a failed kidney allograft on immunosuppressive medications.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Ogawa,&nbsp;Omer E Beaird,&nbsp;Joanna M Schaenman\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fneph.2023.1149116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients with a failing kidney allograft are often continued on immunosuppression (IS) to preserve residual kidney function and prevent allosensitization. It has been previously accepted that maintaining patients on immunosuppressive therapy results in an increased risk of infection, hospitalization, and mortality. However, as the management of IS in patients with a failed kidney allograft continues to evolve, it is important to review the data regarding associations between infection and specific immunosuppression regimens. We present a review of the literature of failed kidney allograft management and infection risk, and discuss practices for infection prevention. Fifteen studies, published from 1995 to 2022, which investigated the experience of patients with failed allograft and infection, were identified. Infection was most commonly documented as a general event, but when specified, included infections caused by <i>Candida</i>, <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>, and <i>Aspergillus.</i> In addition, the definition of reduced \\\"IS\\\" varied from decreased doses of a triple drug regimen to monotherapy, whereas others did not specify which medications patients were receiving. Despite attempts at lowering net immunosuppression, patients with failed allografts remain at risk of acquiring opportunistic and non-opportunistic infections. Although opportunistic infections secondary to IS are expected, somewhat surprisingly, it appears that the greatest risk of infection may be related to complications of dialysis. Therefore, mitigating strategies, such as planning for an arteriovenous (AV) fistula over a hemodialysis catheter placement, may reduce infection risk. Additional studies are needed to provide more information regarding the types and timing of infection in the setting of a failed kidney allograft. In addition, more data are needed regarding specific medications, doses, and timing of taper of IS to guide future patient management and inform strategies for infection surveillance and prophylaxis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in nephrology\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"1149116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10479655/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneph.2023.1149116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneph.2023.1149116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

同种异体肾移植失败的患者通常继续免疫抑制(IS),以保持剩余的肾功能和防止同种异体致敏。先前已经接受的是,维持患者免疫抑制治疗会增加感染、住院和死亡的风险。然而,随着同种异体肾移植失败患者的IS管理不断发展,有必要回顾有关感染与特异性免疫抑制方案之间关系的数据。我们回顾了有关同种异体肾移植失败的管理和感染风险的文献,并讨论了感染预防的做法。从1995年到2022年发表的15项研究调查了同种异体移植失败和感染患者的经历。感染最常被记录为一般事件,但当具体说明时,包括念珠菌、结核分枝杆菌和曲霉引起的感染。此外,减少“IS”的定义从减少三联药物治疗方案的剂量到单一治疗不等,而其他定义则没有具体说明患者接受的是哪种药物。尽管尝试降低净免疫抑制,同种异体移植失败的患者仍然有获得机会性和非机会性感染的风险。虽然继发于IS的机会性感染是意料之中的,但令人惊讶的是,感染的最大风险似乎与透析并发症有关。因此,缓解策略,如计划在血液透析导管放置的动静脉(AV)瘘,可能会降低感染风险。需要进一步的研究来提供更多关于同种异体肾移植失败时感染的类型和时间的信息。此外,需要更多关于特定药物、剂量和IS逐渐减少时间的数据,以指导未来的患者管理,并为感染监测和预防策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Risk factors for infection in patients with a failed kidney allograft on immunosuppressive medications.

Risk factors for infection in patients with a failed kidney allograft on immunosuppressive medications.

Patients with a failing kidney allograft are often continued on immunosuppression (IS) to preserve residual kidney function and prevent allosensitization. It has been previously accepted that maintaining patients on immunosuppressive therapy results in an increased risk of infection, hospitalization, and mortality. However, as the management of IS in patients with a failed kidney allograft continues to evolve, it is important to review the data regarding associations between infection and specific immunosuppression regimens. We present a review of the literature of failed kidney allograft management and infection risk, and discuss practices for infection prevention. Fifteen studies, published from 1995 to 2022, which investigated the experience of patients with failed allograft and infection, were identified. Infection was most commonly documented as a general event, but when specified, included infections caused by Candida, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Aspergillus. In addition, the definition of reduced "IS" varied from decreased doses of a triple drug regimen to monotherapy, whereas others did not specify which medications patients were receiving. Despite attempts at lowering net immunosuppression, patients with failed allografts remain at risk of acquiring opportunistic and non-opportunistic infections. Although opportunistic infections secondary to IS are expected, somewhat surprisingly, it appears that the greatest risk of infection may be related to complications of dialysis. Therefore, mitigating strategies, such as planning for an arteriovenous (AV) fistula over a hemodialysis catheter placement, may reduce infection risk. Additional studies are needed to provide more information regarding the types and timing of infection in the setting of a failed kidney allograft. In addition, more data are needed regarding specific medications, doses, and timing of taper of IS to guide future patient management and inform strategies for infection surveillance and prophylaxis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信