左旋磺酰丙啶和拉莫司琼预防腹腔镜手术术后恶心呕吐的前瞻性随机双盲研究。

Anesthesia, Essays and Researches Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-09 DOI:10.4103/aer.aer_98_22
R T Ranjithkumar, Imran Sholapur, Ravi Bhat, C Chandan Kumar
{"title":"左旋磺酰丙啶和拉莫司琼预防腹腔镜手术术后恶心呕吐的前瞻性随机双盲研究。","authors":"R T Ranjithkumar,&nbsp;Imran Sholapur,&nbsp;Ravi Bhat,&nbsp;C Chandan Kumar","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_98_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continues to be common complication of anesthesia and surgery in spite of availability of so many antiemetic drugs and regimens for prevention. This study compared Ramosetron and Levosulpiride in terms of efficacy for PONV prevention after laparoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) Levosulpiride 25 mg with i.v. Ramosetron 0.3 mg in preventing PONV.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>S. D. M. College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad from November 2018 to June 2020.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>It is a prospective randomized double-blind study.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>All the data were collected, tabulated, and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Data were analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 22.0 Evaluation version). Unpaired sample <i>t</i>-test and Chi-square test have been used for the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. A <i>P</i> value of 0.05 was considered statistically insignificant.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective randomized, double-blind study was conducted in 200 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery falling under the inclusion criteria are numbered and every nth patient selected by systemic random sampling procedure and allocated into two groups of 100 each, group Levosulpiride (Group L) and group Ramosetron (group R) study drugs givenwithin 30 min induction of anesthesia. Group L will receive LEVOSULPIRIDE 25 mg i.v. Group R will receive RAMOSETRON 0.3 mg i.v.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of vomiting in the Levosulpiride group and in the Ramosetron groupduring 0-4 h (20% vs. 30%, <i>P</i> = 0.1110), 4-8 h (4% vs. 5%, <i>P</i> = 0.7450), 8-12 h (5% vs. 4% <i>P</i> = 0.7210) and 12-24 h (0% vs. 0%). The incidence of nausea and overall PONV and the use of rescue antiemetic was not significantly different during all time intervals. The severity of nausea was not different between the two groups. Difference in the efficacy of Levosulpiride and Ramosetron was statistically insignificant (<i>P</i> > 0.05) in the prevention of PONV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Levosulpiride 25 mg or Ramosetron 0.3 mg given intravenously to prevent PONV inpatients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia are equally effective in controlling PONV.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 3","pages":"307-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Levosulpiride and Ramosetron for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Double-blind Study.\",\"authors\":\"R T Ranjithkumar,&nbsp;Imran Sholapur,&nbsp;Ravi Bhat,&nbsp;C Chandan Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aer.aer_98_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continues to be common complication of anesthesia and surgery in spite of availability of so many antiemetic drugs and regimens for prevention. This study compared Ramosetron and Levosulpiride in terms of efficacy for PONV prevention after laparoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) Levosulpiride 25 mg with i.v. Ramosetron 0.3 mg in preventing PONV.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>S. D. M. College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad from November 2018 to June 2020.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>It is a prospective randomized double-blind study.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>All the data were collected, tabulated, and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Data were analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 22.0 Evaluation version). Unpaired sample <i>t</i>-test and Chi-square test have been used for the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. A <i>P</i> value of 0.05 was considered statistically insignificant.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective randomized, double-blind study was conducted in 200 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery falling under the inclusion criteria are numbered and every nth patient selected by systemic random sampling procedure and allocated into two groups of 100 each, group Levosulpiride (Group L) and group Ramosetron (group R) study drugs givenwithin 30 min induction of anesthesia. Group L will receive LEVOSULPIRIDE 25 mg i.v. Group R will receive RAMOSETRON 0.3 mg i.v.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of vomiting in the Levosulpiride group and in the Ramosetron groupduring 0-4 h (20% vs. 30%, <i>P</i> = 0.1110), 4-8 h (4% vs. 5%, <i>P</i> = 0.7450), 8-12 h (5% vs. 4% <i>P</i> = 0.7210) and 12-24 h (0% vs. 0%). The incidence of nausea and overall PONV and the use of rescue antiemetic was not significantly different during all time intervals. The severity of nausea was not different between the two groups. Difference in the efficacy of Levosulpiride and Ramosetron was statistically insignificant (<i>P</i> > 0.05) in the prevention of PONV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Levosulpiride 25 mg or Ramosetron 0.3 mg given intravenously to prevent PONV inpatients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia are equally effective in controlling PONV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"307-310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813998/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_98_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_98_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有很多止吐药物和预防方案,但术后恶心呕吐(PONV)仍然是麻醉和手术的常见并发症。这项研究比较了拉莫司琼和左奥索吡林在腹腔镜手术后预防PONV的疗效。目的:比较静脉注射(i.v.)25 mg左旋磺酰脲和静脉注射0.3 mg拉莫司琼预防PONV的疗效。背景:2018年11月至2020年6月,位于达尔瓦德萨图尔的S.D.M.医学院和医院。设计:这是一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。统计分析:收集所有数据,制成表格,并表示为平均值±标准差。使用IBM社会科学统计软件包(SPSS 22.0评估版)对数据进行分析。未配对样本t检验和卡方检验分别用于定量和定性数据。0.05的P值被认为具有统计学意义。材料和方法:这项前瞻性随机、双盲研究对200名符合纳入标准的腹腔镜手术患者进行了编号,每n名患者通过系统随机抽样程序进行选择,并分为两组,每组100人,左组(L组)和拉莫司琼组(R组)研究药物给药30min。L组将静脉注射左苏必利25 mg。R组将静脉滴注拉莫司琼0.3 mg。结果:左苏必利组和拉莫司琼组在0-4小时(20%对30%,P=0.1110)、4-8小时(4%对5%,P=0.7450)、8-12小时(5%对4%,P=0.7210)和12-24小时(0%对0%)期间的呕吐发生率。在所有时间间隔内,恶心和总PONV的发生率以及抢救止吐药的使用没有显著差异。恶心的严重程度在两组之间没有差异。在预防PONV方面,左奥索匹林和拉司琼的疗效差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:静脉滴注25 mg左旋磺酰脲或0.3 mg拉司琼预防PONV住院患者在全麻下接受选择性腹腔镜手术,对控制PONV同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Levosulpiride and Ramosetron for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Double-blind Study.

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continues to be common complication of anesthesia and surgery in spite of availability of so many antiemetic drugs and regimens for prevention. This study compared Ramosetron and Levosulpiride in terms of efficacy for PONV prevention after laparoscopic surgery.

Aim: To compare the efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) Levosulpiride 25 mg with i.v. Ramosetron 0.3 mg in preventing PONV.

Setting: S. D. M. College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad from November 2018 to June 2020.

Design: It is a prospective randomized double-blind study.

Statistical analysis: All the data were collected, tabulated, and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Data were analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 22.0 Evaluation version). Unpaired sample t-test and Chi-square test have been used for the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. A P value of 0.05 was considered statistically insignificant.

Materials and methods: This prospective randomized, double-blind study was conducted in 200 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery falling under the inclusion criteria are numbered and every nth patient selected by systemic random sampling procedure and allocated into two groups of 100 each, group Levosulpiride (Group L) and group Ramosetron (group R) study drugs givenwithin 30 min induction of anesthesia. Group L will receive LEVOSULPIRIDE 25 mg i.v. Group R will receive RAMOSETRON 0.3 mg i.v.

Results: The incidence of vomiting in the Levosulpiride group and in the Ramosetron groupduring 0-4 h (20% vs. 30%, P = 0.1110), 4-8 h (4% vs. 5%, P = 0.7450), 8-12 h (5% vs. 4% P = 0.7210) and 12-24 h (0% vs. 0%). The incidence of nausea and overall PONV and the use of rescue antiemetic was not significantly different during all time intervals. The severity of nausea was not different between the two groups. Difference in the efficacy of Levosulpiride and Ramosetron was statistically insignificant (P > 0.05) in the prevention of PONV.

Conclusion: Levosulpiride 25 mg or Ramosetron 0.3 mg given intravenously to prevent PONV inpatients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia are equally effective in controlling PONV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信