老年痴呆患者30天急诊科回访率:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-02 DOI:10.1007/s43678-023-00578-z
Dana Jelinski, Olayinka I Arimoro, Caley Shukalek, Kayla R Furlong, Eddy Lang, Krista Reich, Jayna Holroyd-Leduc, Zahra Goodarzi
{"title":"老年痴呆患者30天急诊科回访率:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Dana Jelinski, Olayinka I Arimoro, Caley Shukalek, Kayla R Furlong, Eddy Lang, Krista Reich, Jayna Holroyd-Leduc, Zahra Goodarzi","doi":"10.1007/s43678-023-00578-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Older adults visit emergency departments (EDs) at higher rates than their younger counterparts. However, less is known about the rate at which older adults living with dementia visit and revisit EDs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the revisit rate to the ED among older adults living with a dementia diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL, as well as gray literature, to identify observational studies reporting on older adults living with dementia that revisited an ED within 30 days of a prior ED visit. We calculated pooled rates of 30-day revisit as percentages using random effects models, and conducted stratified analyses by study data source, study population, and study period. We assessed between-studies heterogeneity using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic and considered [Formula: see text] > 50% to indicate substantial heterogeneity. All analyses were performed in R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified six articles for inclusion. Percentages of 30-day ED revisit among older adults living with dementia ranged widely from 16.1% to 58.0%. The overall revisit rate of 28.6% showed significant heterogeneity. Between-studies heterogeneity across all stratified analyses was also high. By data source, 30-day revisit percentages were 52.3% (public hospitals) and 20.0% (administrative databases); by study population, revisit percentages were 33.5% (dementia as main population) and 19.8% (dementia as a subgroup). By study period, revisit percentages were 41.2% (5 years or greater) and 18.9% (5 years or less).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Existing literature on ED revisits among older adults living with dementia highlights the medical complexities and challenges surrounding discharge and follow-up care that may cause these patients to seek ED care at an increased rate. ED personnel may play an important role in connecting patients and caregivers to more appropriate medical and social resources in order to deliver an efficient and more rounded approach to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55286,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"884-892"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rates of 30-day revisit to the emergency department among older adults living with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Dana Jelinski, Olayinka I Arimoro, Caley Shukalek, Kayla R Furlong, Eddy Lang, Krista Reich, Jayna Holroyd-Leduc, Zahra Goodarzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43678-023-00578-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Older adults visit emergency departments (EDs) at higher rates than their younger counterparts. However, less is known about the rate at which older adults living with dementia visit and revisit EDs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the revisit rate to the ED among older adults living with a dementia diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL, as well as gray literature, to identify observational studies reporting on older adults living with dementia that revisited an ED within 30 days of a prior ED visit. We calculated pooled rates of 30-day revisit as percentages using random effects models, and conducted stratified analyses by study data source, study population, and study period. We assessed between-studies heterogeneity using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic and considered [Formula: see text] > 50% to indicate substantial heterogeneity. All analyses were performed in R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified six articles for inclusion. Percentages of 30-day ED revisit among older adults living with dementia ranged widely from 16.1% to 58.0%. The overall revisit rate of 28.6% showed significant heterogeneity. Between-studies heterogeneity across all stratified analyses was also high. By data source, 30-day revisit percentages were 52.3% (public hospitals) and 20.0% (administrative databases); by study population, revisit percentages were 33.5% (dementia as main population) and 19.8% (dementia as a subgroup). By study period, revisit percentages were 41.2% (5 years or greater) and 18.9% (5 years or less).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Existing literature on ED revisits among older adults living with dementia highlights the medical complexities and challenges surrounding discharge and follow-up care that may cause these patients to seek ED care at an increased rate. ED personnel may play an important role in connecting patients and caregivers to more appropriate medical and social resources in order to deliver an efficient and more rounded approach to care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"884-892\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-023-00578-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-023-00578-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:老年人访问急诊科(ed)的比率高于年轻人。然而,对于老年痴呆症患者访问和重新访问急诊科的比率知之甚少。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以量化诊断为痴呆症的老年人急诊室的重访率。方法:我们检索MEDLINE、Embase和CINAHL以及灰色文献,以确定观察性研究报告的老年痴呆患者在前一次ED就诊后30天内再次就诊。我们使用随机效应模型以百分比计算了30天重访的合并率,并按研究数据源、研究人群和研究期间进行了分层分析。我们使用I2统计量评估研究间异质性,并考虑[公式:见文本]> 50%表示存在实质性异质性。所有分析均在R软件中进行。结果:我们确定了6篇文章纳入。老年痴呆患者30天ED回访的比例从16.1%到58.0%不等。总体重访率为28.6%,异质性显著。所有分层分析的研究间异质性也很高。按数据来源分,公立医院和行政数据库30天回访率分别为52.3%和20.0%;按研究人群划分,重访百分比分别为33.5%(痴呆症为主要人群)和19.8%(痴呆症为亚组)。按研究时间划分,重访率分别为41.2%(5年及以上)和18.9%(5年及以下)。结论:关于老年痴呆患者急诊科复诊的现有文献强调了出院和随访护理的医学复杂性和挑战,这可能导致这些患者寻求急诊科治疗的比例增加。急诊科人员可能在将患者和护理人员与更合适的医疗和社会资源联系起来,以提供更有效和更全面的护理方法方面发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Rates of 30-day revisit to the emergency department among older adults living with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rates of 30-day revisit to the emergency department among older adults living with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: Older adults visit emergency departments (EDs) at higher rates than their younger counterparts. However, less is known about the rate at which older adults living with dementia visit and revisit EDs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the revisit rate to the ED among older adults living with a dementia diagnosis.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL, as well as gray literature, to identify observational studies reporting on older adults living with dementia that revisited an ED within 30 days of a prior ED visit. We calculated pooled rates of 30-day revisit as percentages using random effects models, and conducted stratified analyses by study data source, study population, and study period. We assessed between-studies heterogeneity using the I2 statistic and considered [Formula: see text] > 50% to indicate substantial heterogeneity. All analyses were performed in R software.

Results: We identified six articles for inclusion. Percentages of 30-day ED revisit among older adults living with dementia ranged widely from 16.1% to 58.0%. The overall revisit rate of 28.6% showed significant heterogeneity. Between-studies heterogeneity across all stratified analyses was also high. By data source, 30-day revisit percentages were 52.3% (public hospitals) and 20.0% (administrative databases); by study population, revisit percentages were 33.5% (dementia as main population) and 19.8% (dementia as a subgroup). By study period, revisit percentages were 41.2% (5 years or greater) and 18.9% (5 years or less).

Conclusion: Existing literature on ED revisits among older adults living with dementia highlights the medical complexities and challenges surrounding discharge and follow-up care that may cause these patients to seek ED care at an increased rate. ED personnel may play an important role in connecting patients and caregivers to more appropriate medical and social resources in order to deliver an efficient and more rounded approach to care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
171
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CJEM is a peer-reviewed journal owned by CAEP. CJEM is published every 2 months (January, March, May, July, September and November). CJEM presents articles of interest to emergency care providers in rural, urban or academic settings. Publishing services are provided by the Canadian Medical Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信