成人慢性胃炎的腹部和膈肌活动度:一项横断面研究

Thania Maion Melo MSc, Flávia Luciana Lobo Cunha MSc, Laylla Marjorye Rebouças Bezerra MSc, Marianna Salemi MSc, Vanessa Alves de Albuquerque MSc, Geisa Guimaraes de Alencar PhD, Gisela Rocha de Siqueira PhD
{"title":"成人慢性胃炎的腹部和膈肌活动度:一项横断面研究","authors":"Thania Maion Melo MSc,&nbsp;Flávia Luciana Lobo Cunha MSc,&nbsp;Laylla Marjorye Rebouças Bezerra MSc,&nbsp;Marianna Salemi MSc,&nbsp;Vanessa Alves de Albuquerque MSc,&nbsp;Geisa Guimaraes de Alencar PhD,&nbsp;Gisela Rocha de Siqueira PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2022.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to assess abdominal and diaphragmatic mobility in adults with chronic gastritis<span> compared with healthy individuals and to analyze the impact of chronic gastritis on musculoskeletal signs and symptoms of the cervical and thoracic spine.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>This was a cross-sectional study conducted by the physiotherapy department at the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco in Brazil. Fifty-seven individuals participated, 28 with chronic gastritis (gastritis group [GG]) and 29 healthy individuals (control group [CG]). We assessed the following: restricted abdominal mobility in the transverse, coronal, and sagittal planes; diaphragmatic mobility; restricted cervical vertebral segmental mobility; restricted thoracic vertebral segmental mobility; and pain on palpation, asymmetry, and density and texture of the soft tissues on the cervical and thoracic spine. The measure of diaphragmatic mobility was assessed with ultrasound imaging. The Fisher exact and χ</span><sup>2</sup> tests were applied to compare the groups (GG and CG) in relation to the restricted mobility of the abdominal tissues near the stomach on all planes and diaphragm, and the independent samples <em>t</em> test to compare the mobility measurements of the diaphragm. A significance level of 5% was considered for all tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Restricted abdominal mobility in all directions (<em>P</em> &lt; .05) was greater in GG when compared with CG except for the counterclockwise direction (<em>P</em> = .09). In GG, 93% of the individuals presented restricted diaphragmatic mobility, with a mean mobility of 3.1 ± 1.9 cm, and in the CG, 36.8% with a mean of 6.9 + 1.7 cm (<em>P</em><span> &lt; .001). The GG presented a higher occurrence of restricted rotation and lateral glide mobility of the cervical vertebrae, pain to palpation, and density and texture dysfunction of the adjacent tissues when compared with CG (</span><em>P</em><span> &lt; .05). In the thoracic region, there was no difference between GG and CG regarding musculoskeletal signs and symptoms.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Individuals with chronic gastritis presented greater abdominal restriction and lower diaphragmatic mobility, in addition to a higher occurrence of musculoskeletal dysfunction in the cervical spine when compared with healthy individuals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947977/pdf/main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abdominal and Diaphragmatic Mobility in Adults With Chronic Gastritis: A Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Thania Maion Melo MSc,&nbsp;Flávia Luciana Lobo Cunha MSc,&nbsp;Laylla Marjorye Rebouças Bezerra MSc,&nbsp;Marianna Salemi MSc,&nbsp;Vanessa Alves de Albuquerque MSc,&nbsp;Geisa Guimaraes de Alencar PhD,&nbsp;Gisela Rocha de Siqueira PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcm.2022.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to assess abdominal and diaphragmatic mobility in adults with chronic gastritis<span> compared with healthy individuals and to analyze the impact of chronic gastritis on musculoskeletal signs and symptoms of the cervical and thoracic spine.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>This was a cross-sectional study conducted by the physiotherapy department at the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco in Brazil. Fifty-seven individuals participated, 28 with chronic gastritis (gastritis group [GG]) and 29 healthy individuals (control group [CG]). We assessed the following: restricted abdominal mobility in the transverse, coronal, and sagittal planes; diaphragmatic mobility; restricted cervical vertebral segmental mobility; restricted thoracic vertebral segmental mobility; and pain on palpation, asymmetry, and density and texture of the soft tissues on the cervical and thoracic spine. The measure of diaphragmatic mobility was assessed with ultrasound imaging. The Fisher exact and χ</span><sup>2</sup> tests were applied to compare the groups (GG and CG) in relation to the restricted mobility of the abdominal tissues near the stomach on all planes and diaphragm, and the independent samples <em>t</em> test to compare the mobility measurements of the diaphragm. A significance level of 5% was considered for all tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Restricted abdominal mobility in all directions (<em>P</em> &lt; .05) was greater in GG when compared with CG except for the counterclockwise direction (<em>P</em> = .09). In GG, 93% of the individuals presented restricted diaphragmatic mobility, with a mean mobility of 3.1 ± 1.9 cm, and in the CG, 36.8% with a mean of 6.9 + 1.7 cm (<em>P</em><span> &lt; .001). The GG presented a higher occurrence of restricted rotation and lateral glide mobility of the cervical vertebrae, pain to palpation, and density and texture dysfunction of the adjacent tissues when compared with CG (</span><em>P</em><span> &lt; .05). In the thoracic region, there was no difference between GG and CG regarding musculoskeletal signs and symptoms.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Individuals with chronic gastritis presented greater abdominal restriction and lower diaphragmatic mobility, in addition to a higher occurrence of musculoskeletal dysfunction in the cervical spine when compared with healthy individuals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947977/pdf/main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370722000864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370722000864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本研究的目的是评估成人慢性胃炎患者与健康人的腹部和膈肌活动能力,并分析慢性胃炎对颈椎和胸椎肌肉骨骼体征和症状的影响。方法本研究是由巴西伯南布哥联邦大学物理治疗系进行的一项横断面研究。57人参与研究,其中慢性胃炎28人(胃炎组[GG]),健康29人(对照组[CG])。我们评估如下:腹部横切面、冠状面和矢状面活动受限;横隔膜的流动性;颈椎节段活动受限;胸椎节段活动受限;触诊疼痛,不对称,以及颈椎和胸椎软组织的密度和质地。超声成像评估膈肌活动度。采用Fisher精确检验和χ2检验比较各组(GG组和CG组)胃附近腹部组织在各平面和横膈膜上受限的活动度,采用独立样本t检验比较横膈膜活动度。所有测试的显著性水平均为5%。结果腹部活动受限(P <除逆时针方向外,GG组均高于CG组(P = .09)。在GG组,93%的个体表现出膈肌活动受限,平均活动范围为3.1±1.9 cm;在CG组,36.8%的个体表现出膈肌活动受限,平均6.9±1.7 cm (P <措施)。与CG相比,GG组出现颈椎旋转和侧向滑动受限、触诊疼痛、邻近组织密度和质地功能障碍的发生率更高(P <. 05)。在胸部区域,GG和CG在肌肉骨骼体征和症状方面没有差异。结论与健康人相比,慢性胃炎患者腹部受限程度更大,膈肌活动度更低,颈椎肌肉骨骼功能障碍发生率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abdominal and Diaphragmatic Mobility in Adults With Chronic Gastritis: A Cross-Sectional Study

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess abdominal and diaphragmatic mobility in adults with chronic gastritis compared with healthy individuals and to analyze the impact of chronic gastritis on musculoskeletal signs and symptoms of the cervical and thoracic spine.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted by the physiotherapy department at the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco in Brazil. Fifty-seven individuals participated, 28 with chronic gastritis (gastritis group [GG]) and 29 healthy individuals (control group [CG]). We assessed the following: restricted abdominal mobility in the transverse, coronal, and sagittal planes; diaphragmatic mobility; restricted cervical vertebral segmental mobility; restricted thoracic vertebral segmental mobility; and pain on palpation, asymmetry, and density and texture of the soft tissues on the cervical and thoracic spine. The measure of diaphragmatic mobility was assessed with ultrasound imaging. The Fisher exact and χ2 tests were applied to compare the groups (GG and CG) in relation to the restricted mobility of the abdominal tissues near the stomach on all planes and diaphragm, and the independent samples t test to compare the mobility measurements of the diaphragm. A significance level of 5% was considered for all tests.

Results

Restricted abdominal mobility in all directions (P < .05) was greater in GG when compared with CG except for the counterclockwise direction (P = .09). In GG, 93% of the individuals presented restricted diaphragmatic mobility, with a mean mobility of 3.1 ± 1.9 cm, and in the CG, 36.8% with a mean of 6.9 + 1.7 cm (P < .001). The GG presented a higher occurrence of restricted rotation and lateral glide mobility of the cervical vertebrae, pain to palpation, and density and texture dysfunction of the adjacent tissues when compared with CG (P < .05). In the thoracic region, there was no difference between GG and CG regarding musculoskeletal signs and symptoms.

Conclusion

Individuals with chronic gastritis presented greater abdominal restriction and lower diaphragmatic mobility, in addition to a higher occurrence of musculoskeletal dysfunction in the cervical spine when compared with healthy individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信