在 COVID-19 大流行期间,流动性运动障碍中心的远程医疗使用情况和患者满意度。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-27 DOI:10.1177/1357633X221146819
Shubhendu Mishra, Nikhil Dhuna, Nicola Lancki, Chen Yeh, Danielle N Larson
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间,流动性运动障碍中心的远程医疗使用情况和患者满意度。","authors":"Shubhendu Mishra, Nikhil Dhuna, Nicola Lancki, Chen Yeh, Danielle N Larson","doi":"10.1177/1357633X221146819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies suggest that patients are satisfied with telehealth in ambulatory settings. However, tele-neurology satisfaction data are limited by a small sample size and COVID-19-era data is not specific to movement disorders clinics. In this prospective observational study, telehealth utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic was assessed, and patient satisfaction was compared between telehealth and in-person visits in an outpatient movement disorders center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients ≥18 years who completed an appointment at Northwestern's Movement Disorders Clinic were invited to complete a post-visit Medallia survey. The primary outcomes of the survey were likelihood to recommend (LTR) provider, LTR location, and 'spent enough time,' on a 0-10 scale. Responses were categorized into in-person vs. telehealth groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Telehealth utilization significantly increased from a pre-COVID timeframe rate of 0.3% (Nov 2019 to Feb 2020) to 39.5% during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 through April 2021) (<i>p</i>-value < 0.001). During the COVID-19 pandemic, 621 patients responded to the post-visit Medallia survey (response rate = 30%), including 365 in-person and 256 telehealth visits. No significant differences were observed between in-person and telehealth encounters in LTR provider (<i>p</i> = 0.892), LTR location (<i>p</i> = 0.659), and time spent (<i>p</i> = 0.395). Additional subgroup multivariable analysis did not support differences in satisfaction between different age groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>With its large sample size, our study demonstrates that in the setting of increased TH utilization in movement disorders clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic, patients reported similar satisfaction with telehealth compared to in-person visits. This study supports the utility of telehealth to provide specialized neurologic clinic care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1293-1299"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805996/pdf/10.1177_1357633X221146819.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telehealth utilization and patient satisfaction in an ambulatory movement disorders center during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Shubhendu Mishra, Nikhil Dhuna, Nicola Lancki, Chen Yeh, Danielle N Larson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1357633X221146819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies suggest that patients are satisfied with telehealth in ambulatory settings. However, tele-neurology satisfaction data are limited by a small sample size and COVID-19-era data is not specific to movement disorders clinics. In this prospective observational study, telehealth utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic was assessed, and patient satisfaction was compared between telehealth and in-person visits in an outpatient movement disorders center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients ≥18 years who completed an appointment at Northwestern's Movement Disorders Clinic were invited to complete a post-visit Medallia survey. The primary outcomes of the survey were likelihood to recommend (LTR) provider, LTR location, and 'spent enough time,' on a 0-10 scale. Responses were categorized into in-person vs. telehealth groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Telehealth utilization significantly increased from a pre-COVID timeframe rate of 0.3% (Nov 2019 to Feb 2020) to 39.5% during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 through April 2021) (<i>p</i>-value < 0.001). During the COVID-19 pandemic, 621 patients responded to the post-visit Medallia survey (response rate = 30%), including 365 in-person and 256 telehealth visits. No significant differences were observed between in-person and telehealth encounters in LTR provider (<i>p</i> = 0.892), LTR location (<i>p</i> = 0.659), and time spent (<i>p</i> = 0.395). Additional subgroup multivariable analysis did not support differences in satisfaction between different age groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>With its large sample size, our study demonstrates that in the setting of increased TH utilization in movement disorders clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic, patients reported similar satisfaction with telehealth compared to in-person visits. This study supports the utility of telehealth to provide specialized neurologic clinic care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1293-1299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805996/pdf/10.1177_1357633X221146819.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X221146819\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X221146819","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介研究表明,患者对门诊环境中的远程医疗感到满意。然而,远程神经病学的满意度数据因样本量较小而受到限制,而且 COVID-19 期间的数据并非专门针对运动障碍诊所。在这项前瞻性观察研究中,对 COVID-19 大流行期间远程医疗的使用情况进行了评估,并比较了运动障碍门诊中心远程医疗和亲自就诊的患者满意度:方法:邀请在西北大学运动障碍门诊就诊的 18 岁以上患者完成就诊后 Medallia 调查。调查的主要结果是推荐(LTR)医疗服务提供者的可能性、LTR地点和 "花了足够的时间",采用0-10分制。结果显示:在 COVID-19 大流行期间(2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 4 月),远程医疗利用率从 COVID 前的 0.3%(2019 年 11 月至 2020 年 2 月)大幅增至 39.5%(p 值 p = 0.892)、LTR 地点(p = 0.659)和花费时间(p = 0.395)。其他亚组多变量分析不支持不同年龄组之间的满意度差异:讨论:我们的研究具有较大的样本量,表明在 COVID-19 大流行期间,运动障碍门诊对远程医疗的使用率增加,患者对远程医疗的满意度与亲临现场就诊的满意度相似。这项研究证明了远程医疗在提供神经科专科门诊护理方面的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Telehealth utilization and patient satisfaction in an ambulatory movement disorders center during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction: Studies suggest that patients are satisfied with telehealth in ambulatory settings. However, tele-neurology satisfaction data are limited by a small sample size and COVID-19-era data is not specific to movement disorders clinics. In this prospective observational study, telehealth utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic was assessed, and patient satisfaction was compared between telehealth and in-person visits in an outpatient movement disorders center.

Methods: Patients ≥18 years who completed an appointment at Northwestern's Movement Disorders Clinic were invited to complete a post-visit Medallia survey. The primary outcomes of the survey were likelihood to recommend (LTR) provider, LTR location, and 'spent enough time,' on a 0-10 scale. Responses were categorized into in-person vs. telehealth groups.

Results: Telehealth utilization significantly increased from a pre-COVID timeframe rate of 0.3% (Nov 2019 to Feb 2020) to 39.5% during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 through April 2021) (p-value < 0.001). During the COVID-19 pandemic, 621 patients responded to the post-visit Medallia survey (response rate = 30%), including 365 in-person and 256 telehealth visits. No significant differences were observed between in-person and telehealth encounters in LTR provider (p = 0.892), LTR location (p = 0.659), and time spent (p = 0.395). Additional subgroup multivariable analysis did not support differences in satisfaction between different age groups.

Discussion: With its large sample size, our study demonstrates that in the setting of increased TH utilization in movement disorders clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic, patients reported similar satisfaction with telehealth compared to in-person visits. This study supports the utility of telehealth to provide specialized neurologic clinic care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信