Sofia Silva Mendes, Miguel Areia, Mário Dinis Ribeiro, Carla Rolanda
{"title":"结构化虚拟现实模拟训练课程对新手内镜医师的影响。","authors":"Sofia Silva Mendes, Miguel Areia, Mário Dinis Ribeiro, Carla Rolanda","doi":"10.1159/000519927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current evidence supports the use of virtual reality (VR) simulation-based training for novice endoscopists. However, there is still a need for a standardized induction programme which ensures sufficient preparation, with knowledge and basic skills, before their approach to patient-based training. We designed a structured progressive programme in upper endoscopy and colonoscopy and aimed to determine its impact on cognitive and technical performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, multicentre study, focused on \"Endoscopy I, 2018,\" a course with a theoretical and a hands-on module (20 h) in the GI Mentor II®. Gastroenterology residents of the 1st year were enrolled. A pre-test and test were applied to evaluate the cognitive component, and a pre-training and post-training esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy VR cases were used to evaluate the technical component. The hands-on training included psychomotor exercises (Navigation I, Endobubble I), 4 EGD, and 4 colonoscopy VR cases. The metrics applied for technical skills evaluation were time to reach the second portion of duodenum (D2)/cecum (seconds), efficiency of screening (%), and time the patient was in pain (%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three participants were included, majority female (67%), 26 ± 0.7 years old. Comparing the pre-test versus test, the cognitive score significantly improved (11/15 vs. 14/15; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Considering the technical assessment after training: in EGD, the time to D2 was significantly lower (193 vs. 63 s; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the efficiency of screening significantly better (64 vs. 91%; <i>p</i> < 0.001); in colonoscopy, the time to reach the cecum was significantly lower (599 vs. 294 s; <i>p</i> = 0.001), the time the patient was in pain was significantly lower (27 vs. 10%; <i>p</i> = 0.005), and the efficiency of screening had a tendency towards improvement (50 vs. 68%; <i>p</i> = 0.062).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed training curriculum in basic endoscopy for novices is aligned with international recommendations and demonstrated a significant impact on cognitive and technical skills learning achievements.</p>","PeriodicalId":51838,"journal":{"name":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"29 6","pages":"385-392"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/68/17/pjg-0029-0385.PMC9761362.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of a Structured Virtual Reality Simulation Training Curriculum for Novice Endoscopists.\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Silva Mendes, Miguel Areia, Mário Dinis Ribeiro, Carla Rolanda\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000519927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current evidence supports the use of virtual reality (VR) simulation-based training for novice endoscopists. However, there is still a need for a standardized induction programme which ensures sufficient preparation, with knowledge and basic skills, before their approach to patient-based training. We designed a structured progressive programme in upper endoscopy and colonoscopy and aimed to determine its impact on cognitive and technical performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, multicentre study, focused on \\\"Endoscopy I, 2018,\\\" a course with a theoretical and a hands-on module (20 h) in the GI Mentor II®. Gastroenterology residents of the 1st year were enrolled. A pre-test and test were applied to evaluate the cognitive component, and a pre-training and post-training esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy VR cases were used to evaluate the technical component. The hands-on training included psychomotor exercises (Navigation I, Endobubble I), 4 EGD, and 4 colonoscopy VR cases. The metrics applied for technical skills evaluation were time to reach the second portion of duodenum (D2)/cecum (seconds), efficiency of screening (%), and time the patient was in pain (%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three participants were included, majority female (67%), 26 ± 0.7 years old. Comparing the pre-test versus test, the cognitive score significantly improved (11/15 vs. 14/15; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Considering the technical assessment after training: in EGD, the time to D2 was significantly lower (193 vs. 63 s; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the efficiency of screening significantly better (64 vs. 91%; <i>p</i> < 0.001); in colonoscopy, the time to reach the cecum was significantly lower (599 vs. 294 s; <i>p</i> = 0.001), the time the patient was in pain was significantly lower (27 vs. 10%; <i>p</i> = 0.005), and the efficiency of screening had a tendency towards improvement (50 vs. 68%; <i>p</i> = 0.062).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed training curriculum in basic endoscopy for novices is aligned with international recommendations and demonstrated a significant impact on cognitive and technical skills learning achievements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"385-392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/68/17/pjg-0029-0385.PMC9761362.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000519927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000519927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景:目前的证据支持使用虚拟现实(VR)模拟为基础的培训新手内镜医师。然而,仍然需要一个标准化的入职方案,以确保在他们进行以病人为基础的培训之前做好充分的准备,掌握知识和基本技能。我们设计了一个结构化的上颌内窥镜检查和结肠镜检查的渐进方案,旨在确定其对认知和技术表现的影响。方法:前瞻性,多中心研究,重点是“内镜I, 2018”,这是一门在GI Mentor II®中具有理论和实践模块(20小时)的课程。第一年的胃肠病学住院医师被纳入研究。采用预测试和测试对认知成分进行评估,采用训练前和训练后食管胃十二指肠镜(EGD)和结肠镜VR病例对技术成分进行评估。实践训练包括精神运动练习(导航I, Endobubble I), 4例EGD和4例结肠镜VR病例。用于技术技能评估的指标为到达十二指肠第二段(D2)/盲肠的时间(秒)、筛查效率(%)和患者疼痛时间(%)。结果:共纳入23例,以女性为主(67%),年龄26±0.7岁。测试前与测试后比较,认知得分显著提高(11/15比14/15;P < 0.001)。考虑到培训后的技术评估:在EGD中,到D2的时间明显较低(193 vs. 63 s;P < 0.001),筛查效率显著提高(64% vs 91%;P < 0.001);在结肠镜检查中,到达盲肠的时间明显更短(599 vs 294 s;P = 0.001),患者疼痛时间明显缩短(27% vs. 10%;P = 0.005),筛查效率有提高的趋势(50% vs 68%;P = 0.062)。结论:建议的初级内窥镜培训课程与国际建议一致,对认知和技术技能学习成绩有显著影响。
The Impact of a Structured Virtual Reality Simulation Training Curriculum for Novice Endoscopists.
Background: Current evidence supports the use of virtual reality (VR) simulation-based training for novice endoscopists. However, there is still a need for a standardized induction programme which ensures sufficient preparation, with knowledge and basic skills, before their approach to patient-based training. We designed a structured progressive programme in upper endoscopy and colonoscopy and aimed to determine its impact on cognitive and technical performance.
Methods: Prospective, multicentre study, focused on "Endoscopy I, 2018," a course with a theoretical and a hands-on module (20 h) in the GI Mentor II®. Gastroenterology residents of the 1st year were enrolled. A pre-test and test were applied to evaluate the cognitive component, and a pre-training and post-training esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy VR cases were used to evaluate the technical component. The hands-on training included psychomotor exercises (Navigation I, Endobubble I), 4 EGD, and 4 colonoscopy VR cases. The metrics applied for technical skills evaluation were time to reach the second portion of duodenum (D2)/cecum (seconds), efficiency of screening (%), and time the patient was in pain (%).
Results: Twenty-three participants were included, majority female (67%), 26 ± 0.7 years old. Comparing the pre-test versus test, the cognitive score significantly improved (11/15 vs. 14/15; p < 0.001). Considering the technical assessment after training: in EGD, the time to D2 was significantly lower (193 vs. 63 s; p < 0.001), and the efficiency of screening significantly better (64 vs. 91%; p < 0.001); in colonoscopy, the time to reach the cecum was significantly lower (599 vs. 294 s; p = 0.001), the time the patient was in pain was significantly lower (27 vs. 10%; p = 0.005), and the efficiency of screening had a tendency towards improvement (50 vs. 68%; p = 0.062).
Conclusion: The proposed training curriculum in basic endoscopy for novices is aligned with international recommendations and demonstrated a significant impact on cognitive and technical skills learning achievements.
期刊介绍:
The ''GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology'' (formerly Jornal Português de Gastrenterologia), founded in 1994, is the official publication of Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia (Portuguese Society of Gastroenterology), Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (Portuguese Society of Digestive Endoscopy) and Associação Portuguesa para o Estudo do Fígado (Portuguese Association for the Study of the Liver). The journal publishes clinical and basic research articles on Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy, Hepatology and related topics. Review articles, clinical case studies, images, letters to the editor and other articles such as recommendations or papers on gastroenterology clinical practice are also considered. Only articles written in English are accepted.