应对学业挑战:护理专业低年级学生补考策略效果的准实验研究。

IF 1.1 Q3 NURSING
Eman M Gaber Hassan
{"title":"应对学业挑战:护理专业低年级学生补考策略效果的准实验研究。","authors":"Eman M Gaber Hassan","doi":"10.33546/bnj.2699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Universities are responsible for providing education and support to all students, including those who may be underachieving. To fulfill this responsibility, universities need effective strategies to help these students graduate successfully.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a midterm remedial exam strategy in improving the academic performance of nursing students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental design was employed to conduct this research at a private college in Dammam, Saudi Arabia's eastern region. The study included 306 convenient bachelor nursing students who had failed their midterm exam. Of these, 103 students voluntarily participated in the remedial midterm exam (intervention group) to enhance their midterm scores, while 203 students did not take the remedial exam (control group). Data collection took place in the spring of 2022 by reviewing course files and student records, encompassing formative and summative evaluations across 14 courses. Data analysis involved using SPSS (2023) and Jamovi (version 2.3, 2022) software to conduct paired <i>t-tests</i>, Mann-Whitney, and correlational tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The remedial group demonstrated significant differences between their midterm and remedial exam scores. However, only 15.5% of students in the remedial group passed the exam, despite 68% showing improvement. Additionally, there were significant differences between the intervention and control groups in midterm and overall course scores. The control group outperformed the remedial group in the midterm, final exams, and overall course scores (<i>p</i> <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remedial exams can be beneficial for students who are close to passing but may not effectively support those who perform poorly. To address this, implementing a comprehensive remedial program or providing ongoing remedial activities throughout the course can offer better support for strongly underperforming students. Additionally, educational institutions can enhance students' motivation and performance by providing study skills classes and time-management workshops, equipping them with valuable tools for academic success.</p>","PeriodicalId":42002,"journal":{"name":"Belitung Nursing Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/42/d5/BNJ-9-4-369.PMC10461156.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing academic challenges: A quasi-experimental study on the effect of remedial exam strategy for nursing students with low academic performance.\",\"authors\":\"Eman M Gaber Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.33546/bnj.2699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Universities are responsible for providing education and support to all students, including those who may be underachieving. To fulfill this responsibility, universities need effective strategies to help these students graduate successfully.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a midterm remedial exam strategy in improving the academic performance of nursing students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental design was employed to conduct this research at a private college in Dammam, Saudi Arabia's eastern region. The study included 306 convenient bachelor nursing students who had failed their midterm exam. Of these, 103 students voluntarily participated in the remedial midterm exam (intervention group) to enhance their midterm scores, while 203 students did not take the remedial exam (control group). Data collection took place in the spring of 2022 by reviewing course files and student records, encompassing formative and summative evaluations across 14 courses. Data analysis involved using SPSS (2023) and Jamovi (version 2.3, 2022) software to conduct paired <i>t-tests</i>, Mann-Whitney, and correlational tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The remedial group demonstrated significant differences between their midterm and remedial exam scores. However, only 15.5% of students in the remedial group passed the exam, despite 68% showing improvement. Additionally, there were significant differences between the intervention and control groups in midterm and overall course scores. The control group outperformed the remedial group in the midterm, final exams, and overall course scores (<i>p</i> <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remedial exams can be beneficial for students who are close to passing but may not effectively support those who perform poorly. To address this, implementing a comprehensive remedial program or providing ongoing remedial activities throughout the course can offer better support for strongly underperforming students. Additionally, educational institutions can enhance students' motivation and performance by providing study skills classes and time-management workshops, equipping them with valuable tools for academic success.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Belitung Nursing Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/42/d5/BNJ-9-4-369.PMC10461156.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Belitung Nursing Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.2699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belitung Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.2699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大学有责任为所有学生提供教育和支持,包括那些成绩不佳的学生。为了履行这一责任,大学需要有效的策略来帮助这些学生顺利毕业。目的:本研究旨在评估期中补考策略对护生学业成绩的改善效果。方法:采用准实验设计,在沙特阿拉伯东部地区达曼的一所私立大学进行研究。该研究包括306名未通过期中考试的护理本科学生。其中,103名学生自愿参加期中补考(干预组)以提高期中成绩,203名学生不参加期中补考(对照组)。数据收集于2022年春季进行,通过审查课程文件和学生记录,包括14门课程的形成性和总结性评估。数据分析使用SPSS(2023)和Jamovi(2.3版,2022)软件进行配对t检验、Mann-Whitney检验和相关检验。结果:补考组的期中与补考成绩有显著性差异。然而,只有15.5%的补习组学生通过了考试,尽管68%的学生表现出了进步。此外,干预组与对照组在中期和整体课程成绩上有显著差异。控制组在期中、期末考试和整体课程成绩上都优于补考组(p结论:补考对接近及格的学生是有益的,但对那些表现不佳的学生可能没有有效的帮助。为了解决这个问题,实施一个全面的补救计划或在整个课程中提供持续的补救活动,可以为表现不佳的学生提供更好的支持。此外,教育机构可以通过提供学习技巧课程和时间管理研讨会来提高学生的动力和表现,为他们提供学业成功的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addressing academic challenges: A quasi-experimental study on the effect of remedial exam strategy for nursing students with low academic performance.

Background: Universities are responsible for providing education and support to all students, including those who may be underachieving. To fulfill this responsibility, universities need effective strategies to help these students graduate successfully.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a midterm remedial exam strategy in improving the academic performance of nursing students.

Methods: A quasi-experimental design was employed to conduct this research at a private college in Dammam, Saudi Arabia's eastern region. The study included 306 convenient bachelor nursing students who had failed their midterm exam. Of these, 103 students voluntarily participated in the remedial midterm exam (intervention group) to enhance their midterm scores, while 203 students did not take the remedial exam (control group). Data collection took place in the spring of 2022 by reviewing course files and student records, encompassing formative and summative evaluations across 14 courses. Data analysis involved using SPSS (2023) and Jamovi (version 2.3, 2022) software to conduct paired t-tests, Mann-Whitney, and correlational tests.

Results: The remedial group demonstrated significant differences between their midterm and remedial exam scores. However, only 15.5% of students in the remedial group passed the exam, despite 68% showing improvement. Additionally, there were significant differences between the intervention and control groups in midterm and overall course scores. The control group outperformed the remedial group in the midterm, final exams, and overall course scores (p <0.05).

Conclusion: Remedial exams can be beneficial for students who are close to passing but may not effectively support those who perform poorly. To address this, implementing a comprehensive remedial program or providing ongoing remedial activities throughout the course can offer better support for strongly underperforming students. Additionally, educational institutions can enhance students' motivation and performance by providing study skills classes and time-management workshops, equipping them with valuable tools for academic success.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
42.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信