COVID-19大流行期间远程和现场工作压力严重程度:比较和选择条件

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Agata Chudzicka-Czupała, Marta Żywiołek-Szeja, Mateusz Paliga, Damian Grabowski, Noemi Krauze
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间远程和现场工作压力严重程度:比较和选择条件","authors":"Agata Chudzicka-Czupała,&nbsp;Marta Żywiołek-Szeja,&nbsp;Mateusz Paliga,&nbsp;Damian Grabowski,&nbsp;Noemi Krauze","doi":"10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present study was to explore whether remote and on-site work stress during the COVID-19 pandemic was experienced with different severity. The second goal was to investigate stress conditions at both working modes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study involved 946 individuals working in the education system and BSS sector in different Polish organizations. The following tools were used: the <i>Brief Scale of Vocational Stress</i> by Dudek and Hauk, the Polish version of the scales to measure work-family conflicts by Grzywacz, Frone, Brewer and Kovner, Meyer and <i>Allen's Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment Scales</i> in the Polish adaptation by Bańka, Wołowska and Bazińska, the<i> Satisfaction with Job Scale</i> by Zalewska.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of intergroup differences revealed that remote work stress severity was significantly lower than on-site work stress severity. The regression analyses proved that work-family conflict and job satisfaction were significant predictors of remote and on-site work stress. Continuance commitment positively predicted on-site work stress. Both models turned out to be statistically significant. The variables included in the models explained 39% and 35% of the variability of the remote work and on-site work stress, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remote work is associated with lower stress severity than on-site work. For both types of work, the higher the level of work-family conflict, the higher the level of stress severity, but the higher the job satisfaction, the lower the stress severity. Continuance commitment is positively related to on-site stress, which means that people who work for an organization and see no alternative feel more stressed. Such an effect was observed only in the case of on-site work. The study findings are discussed in light of previous research, and implications for organizational practice are considered. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2023;36(1):96-111.</p>","PeriodicalId":14173,"journal":{"name":"International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/00/1f/ijomeh-36-96.PMC10464780.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote and on-site work stress severity during the COVID-19 pandemic: comparison and selected conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Agata Chudzicka-Czupała,&nbsp;Marta Żywiołek-Szeja,&nbsp;Mateusz Paliga,&nbsp;Damian Grabowski,&nbsp;Noemi Krauze\",\"doi\":\"10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present study was to explore whether remote and on-site work stress during the COVID-19 pandemic was experienced with different severity. The second goal was to investigate stress conditions at both working modes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study involved 946 individuals working in the education system and BSS sector in different Polish organizations. The following tools were used: the <i>Brief Scale of Vocational Stress</i> by Dudek and Hauk, the Polish version of the scales to measure work-family conflicts by Grzywacz, Frone, Brewer and Kovner, Meyer and <i>Allen's Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment Scales</i> in the Polish adaptation by Bańka, Wołowska and Bazińska, the<i> Satisfaction with Job Scale</i> by Zalewska.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of intergroup differences revealed that remote work stress severity was significantly lower than on-site work stress severity. The regression analyses proved that work-family conflict and job satisfaction were significant predictors of remote and on-site work stress. Continuance commitment positively predicted on-site work stress. Both models turned out to be statistically significant. The variables included in the models explained 39% and 35% of the variability of the remote work and on-site work stress, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remote work is associated with lower stress severity than on-site work. For both types of work, the higher the level of work-family conflict, the higher the level of stress severity, but the higher the job satisfaction, the lower the stress severity. Continuance commitment is positively related to on-site stress, which means that people who work for an organization and see no alternative feel more stressed. Such an effect was observed only in the case of on-site work. The study findings are discussed in light of previous research, and implications for organizational practice are considered. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2023;36(1):96-111.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/00/1f/ijomeh-36-96.PMC10464780.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨COVID-19大流行期间远程和现场工作压力是否存在不同程度的差异。第二个目标是调查两种工作模式下的应力条件。材料和方法:该研究涉及946名在波兰不同组织的教育系统和BSS部门工作的个人。使用了以下工具:Dudek和Hauk的职业压力简要量表,Grzywacz、Frone、Brewer和Kovner的波兰版工作-家庭冲突量表,Bańka、Wołowska和Bazińska的Meyer和Allen的波兰适应中的情感、持续和规范承诺量表,Zalewska的工作满意度量表。结果:组间差异分析显示,远程工作压力严重程度显著低于现场工作压力严重程度。回归分析证明,工作家庭冲突和工作满意度是远程和现场工作压力的显著预测因子。持续承诺正向预测现场工作压力。这两个模型在统计上都是显著的。模型中包含的变量分别解释了39%和35%的远程工作和现场工作压力的可变性。结论:与现场工作相比,远程工作的压力程度较低。对于两种工作类型,工作-家庭冲突水平越高,压力严重程度越高,但工作满意度越高,压力严重程度越低。持续承诺与现场压力正相关,这意味着为一个组织工作并且没有其他选择的人会感到更大的压力。这种影响只在现场工作的情况下观察到。本文结合前人的研究成果对研究结果进行了讨论,并考虑了对组织实践的启示。中华医学杂志,2009;36(1):96-111。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remote and on-site work stress severity during the COVID-19 pandemic: comparison and selected conditions.

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to explore whether remote and on-site work stress during the COVID-19 pandemic was experienced with different severity. The second goal was to investigate stress conditions at both working modes.

Material and methods: The study involved 946 individuals working in the education system and BSS sector in different Polish organizations. The following tools were used: the Brief Scale of Vocational Stress by Dudek and Hauk, the Polish version of the scales to measure work-family conflicts by Grzywacz, Frone, Brewer and Kovner, Meyer and Allen's Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment Scales in the Polish adaptation by Bańka, Wołowska and Bazińska, the Satisfaction with Job Scale by Zalewska.

Results: The analysis of intergroup differences revealed that remote work stress severity was significantly lower than on-site work stress severity. The regression analyses proved that work-family conflict and job satisfaction were significant predictors of remote and on-site work stress. Continuance commitment positively predicted on-site work stress. Both models turned out to be statistically significant. The variables included in the models explained 39% and 35% of the variability of the remote work and on-site work stress, respectively.

Conclusions: Remote work is associated with lower stress severity than on-site work. For both types of work, the higher the level of work-family conflict, the higher the level of stress severity, but the higher the job satisfaction, the lower the stress severity. Continuance commitment is positively related to on-site stress, which means that people who work for an organization and see no alternative feel more stressed. Such an effect was observed only in the case of on-site work. The study findings are discussed in light of previous research, and implications for organizational practice are considered. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2023;36(1):96-111.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal is dedicated to present the contemporary research in occupational and environmental health from all over the world. It publishes works concerning: occupational and environmental: medicine, epidemiology, hygiene and toxicology; work physiology and ergonomics, musculoskeletal problems; psychosocial factors at work, work-related mental problems, aging, work ability and return to work; working hours, shift work; reproductive factors and endocrine disruptors; radiation, ionizing and non-ionizing health effects; agricultural hazards; work safety and injury and occupational health service; climate change and its effects on health; omics, genetics and epigenetics in occupational and environmental health; health effects of exposure to nanoparticles and nanotechnology products; human biomarkers in occupational and environmental health, intervention studies, clinical sciences’ achievements with potential to improve occupational and environmental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信