在美国现实世界环境中,secukinumab对生物初始银屑病患者报告的结果的影响。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Bruce Strober, Dhaval Patil, Robert R McLean, Melissa Moore-Clingenpeel, Ning Guo, Eugenia Levi, Mark Lebwohl
{"title":"在美国现实世界环境中,secukinumab对生物初始银屑病患者报告的结果的影响。","authors":"Bruce Strober,&nbsp;Dhaval Patil,&nbsp;Robert R McLean,&nbsp;Melissa Moore-Clingenpeel,&nbsp;Ning Guo,&nbsp;Eugenia Levi,&nbsp;Mark Lebwohl","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2022.2116266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe real-world baseline characteristics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits among patients with psoriasis who initiated and maintained secukinumab, stratified by prior exposure to biologics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This real-world study included patients enrolled in the CorEvitas (formerly Corrona) Psoriasis Registry who initiated and maintained secukinumab through 6-month and/or 12-month follow-up. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and PROs were collected. PROs included Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI); itch, skin pain, fatigue, and EuroQol visual analog scales; and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment. Mean (SD) differences between baseline and follow-up visits were calculated for all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 652 patients had a 6-month follow-up visit, 460 (70.6%) were biologic experienced and 192 (29.4%) were biologic naive. Biologic-experienced and biologic-naive patients reported mean (SD) improvements in all PROs measured at 6-month follow-up. Similar improvements were seen among patients with a 12-month follow-up visit (<i>n</i> = 390) and both 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits (<i>n</i> = 326).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biologic-experienced and biologic-naive patients with psoriasis who initiated and maintained secukinumab treatment reported improvements in PROs at 6-month and/or 12-month follow-up visits. These findings suggest that secukinumab is a potential biologic for psoriasis at any point along the patient treatment journey.</p>","PeriodicalId":15639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","volume":"33 8","pages":"3178-3187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of secukinumab on patient-reported outcomes in biologic-naive patients with psoriasis in a US real-world setting.\",\"authors\":\"Bruce Strober,&nbsp;Dhaval Patil,&nbsp;Robert R McLean,&nbsp;Melissa Moore-Clingenpeel,&nbsp;Ning Guo,&nbsp;Eugenia Levi,&nbsp;Mark Lebwohl\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09546634.2022.2116266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe real-world baseline characteristics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits among patients with psoriasis who initiated and maintained secukinumab, stratified by prior exposure to biologics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This real-world study included patients enrolled in the CorEvitas (formerly Corrona) Psoriasis Registry who initiated and maintained secukinumab through 6-month and/or 12-month follow-up. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and PROs were collected. PROs included Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI); itch, skin pain, fatigue, and EuroQol visual analog scales; and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment. Mean (SD) differences between baseline and follow-up visits were calculated for all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 652 patients had a 6-month follow-up visit, 460 (70.6%) were biologic experienced and 192 (29.4%) were biologic naive. Biologic-experienced and biologic-naive patients reported mean (SD) improvements in all PROs measured at 6-month follow-up. Similar improvements were seen among patients with a 12-month follow-up visit (<i>n</i> = 390) and both 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits (<i>n</i> = 326).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biologic-experienced and biologic-naive patients with psoriasis who initiated and maintained secukinumab treatment reported improvements in PROs at 6-month and/or 12-month follow-up visits. These findings suggest that secukinumab is a potential biologic for psoriasis at any point along the patient treatment journey.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dermatological Treatment\",\"volume\":\"33 8\",\"pages\":\"3178-3187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dermatological Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2022.2116266\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2022.2116266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述启动并维持secukinumab的银屑病患者在6个月和12个月随访时的真实基线特征和患者报告的结果(PROs),并按先前暴露于生物制剂进行分层。方法:这项现实世界的研究纳入了在CorEvitas(以前的Corrona)牛皮癣登记处登记的患者,这些患者通过6个月和/或12个月的随访开始并维持了secukinumab。收集人口统计学、临床特征和PROs。PROs包括Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI);瘙痒、皮肤疼痛、疲劳和EuroQol视觉模拟量表;以及工作效率和活动障碍。计算所有结果的基线和随访之间的平均(SD)差异。结果:总体而言,652例患者进行了6个月的随访,460例(70.6%)有生物经验,192例(29.4%)没有生物经验。在6个月的随访中,有生物经验和未接受生物治疗的患者报告了所有PROs的平均(SD)改善。在随访12个月(n = 390)、6个月和12个月随访(n = 326)的患者中也观察到类似的改善。结论:开始并维持secukinumab治疗的有生物经验和无生物经验的银屑病患者在6个月和/或12个月的随访中报告了PROs的改善。这些发现表明,在患者治疗过程中的任何阶段,secukinumab都是治疗银屑病的潜在生物制剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of secukinumab on patient-reported outcomes in biologic-naive patients with psoriasis in a US real-world setting.

Objective: To describe real-world baseline characteristics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits among patients with psoriasis who initiated and maintained secukinumab, stratified by prior exposure to biologics.

Methods: This real-world study included patients enrolled in the CorEvitas (formerly Corrona) Psoriasis Registry who initiated and maintained secukinumab through 6-month and/or 12-month follow-up. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and PROs were collected. PROs included Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI); itch, skin pain, fatigue, and EuroQol visual analog scales; and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment. Mean (SD) differences between baseline and follow-up visits were calculated for all outcomes.

Results: Overall, 652 patients had a 6-month follow-up visit, 460 (70.6%) were biologic experienced and 192 (29.4%) were biologic naive. Biologic-experienced and biologic-naive patients reported mean (SD) improvements in all PROs measured at 6-month follow-up. Similar improvements were seen among patients with a 12-month follow-up visit (n = 390) and both 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits (n = 326).

Conclusions: Biologic-experienced and biologic-naive patients with psoriasis who initiated and maintained secukinumab treatment reported improvements in PROs at 6-month and/or 12-month follow-up visits. These findings suggest that secukinumab is a potential biologic for psoriasis at any point along the patient treatment journey.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dermatological Treatment covers all aspects of the treatment of skin disease, including the use of topical and systematically administered drugs and other forms of therapy. The Journal of Dermatological Treatment is positioned to give dermatologists cutting edge information on new treatments in all areas of dermatology. It also publishes valuable clinical reviews and theoretical papers on dermatological treatments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信