不同财务激励结构对基于网络的健康调查的影响:时间和数量重要吗?

Jaclyn N Escudero, Jasmin A Tiro, Diana S M Buist, Hongyuan Gao, Tara Beatty, John Lin, Diana L Miglioretti, Rachel L Winer
{"title":"不同财务激励结构对基于网络的健康调查的影响:时间和数量重要吗?","authors":"Jaclyn N Escudero,&nbsp;Jasmin A Tiro,&nbsp;Diana S M Buist,&nbsp;Hongyuan Gao,&nbsp;Tara Beatty,&nbsp;John Lin,&nbsp;Diana L Miglioretti,&nbsp;Rachel L Winer","doi":"10.20517/chatmed.2023.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Financial incentives improve response to electronic health surveys, yet little is known about how unconditional incentives (guaranteed regardless of survey completion), conditional incentives, and various combinations of incentives influence response rates. We compared electronic health survey completion with two different financial incentive structures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We invited women aged 30-64 years enrolled in a U.S. healthcare system and overdue for Pap screening to complete a web-based survey after receiving a mailed human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling kit in a pragmatic trial. HPV kit returners (<i>n</i> = 272) and non-returners (<i>n</i> = 1,083) were allocated to one of two different incentive structures: (1) Unconditional: $5 pre-incentive only (<i>n</i> = 653); (2) Combined: $2 pre-incentive plus $10 post-incentive conditional on completion (<i>n</i> = 702). Chi-square tests evaluated whether survey completion differed by incentive structure within kit return groups or was modified by kit return status. For each incentive-by-kit status group, the cost-per-survey response was calculated as: ([number invited*pre-incentive amount] + [number responses*post-incentive amount]) / number responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, survey response was higher in kit returners vs. kit non-returners (42.6% <i>vs.</i> 11.0%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and survey response was higher in the combined (20.1%) <i>vs.</i> unconditional (14.4%) incentive group (<i>P</i> = 0.01). Kit return status did not modify the association between incentive type and survey response (<i>P</i> = 0.52). Among respondents, time to survey completion did not differ by incentive type among either kit returners or non-returners. Among returners, the cost-per-survey response was similar between groups ($13.57 unconditional; $14.15 combined); among non-returners, the cost was greater in the unconditional ($57.78) versus the combined ($25.22) group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A combined incentive can be cost-effective for increasing survey response in health services research, particularly in hard-to-reach populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":72693,"journal":{"name":"Connected health and telemedicine","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of different financial incentive structures on a web-based health survey: do timing and amount matter?\",\"authors\":\"Jaclyn N Escudero,&nbsp;Jasmin A Tiro,&nbsp;Diana S M Buist,&nbsp;Hongyuan Gao,&nbsp;Tara Beatty,&nbsp;John Lin,&nbsp;Diana L Miglioretti,&nbsp;Rachel L Winer\",\"doi\":\"10.20517/chatmed.2023.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Financial incentives improve response to electronic health surveys, yet little is known about how unconditional incentives (guaranteed regardless of survey completion), conditional incentives, and various combinations of incentives influence response rates. We compared electronic health survey completion with two different financial incentive structures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We invited women aged 30-64 years enrolled in a U.S. healthcare system and overdue for Pap screening to complete a web-based survey after receiving a mailed human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling kit in a pragmatic trial. HPV kit returners (<i>n</i> = 272) and non-returners (<i>n</i> = 1,083) were allocated to one of two different incentive structures: (1) Unconditional: $5 pre-incentive only (<i>n</i> = 653); (2) Combined: $2 pre-incentive plus $10 post-incentive conditional on completion (<i>n</i> = 702). Chi-square tests evaluated whether survey completion differed by incentive structure within kit return groups or was modified by kit return status. For each incentive-by-kit status group, the cost-per-survey response was calculated as: ([number invited*pre-incentive amount] + [number responses*post-incentive amount]) / number responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, survey response was higher in kit returners vs. kit non-returners (42.6% <i>vs.</i> 11.0%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and survey response was higher in the combined (20.1%) <i>vs.</i> unconditional (14.4%) incentive group (<i>P</i> = 0.01). Kit return status did not modify the association between incentive type and survey response (<i>P</i> = 0.52). Among respondents, time to survey completion did not differ by incentive type among either kit returners or non-returners. Among returners, the cost-per-survey response was similar between groups ($13.57 unconditional; $14.15 combined); among non-returners, the cost was greater in the unconditional ($57.78) versus the combined ($25.22) group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A combined incentive can be cost-effective for increasing survey response in health services research, particularly in hard-to-reach populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Connected health and telemedicine\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462406/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Connected health and telemedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20517/chatmed.2023.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Connected health and telemedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/chatmed.2023.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:财政激励提高了对电子健康调查的响应,但对无条件激励(无论调查完成与否都保证)、有条件激励和各种激励组合如何影响回复率知之甚少。我们比较了电子健康调查完成与两种不同的财政激励结构。方法:在一项实用的试验中,我们邀请年龄在30-64岁、在美国医疗保健系统登记、逾期未做巴氏涂片筛查的女性在收到邮寄的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自采样试剂盒后完成一项基于网络的调查。HPV试剂盒返回者(n = 272)和未返回者(n = 1,083)被分配到两种不同的激励结构之一:(1)无条件:仅5美元的预激励(n = 653);(2)组合:2美元的前激励加上10美元的后激励,条件是完成(n = 702)。卡方检验评估了问卷完成率是否因工具包归还组的激励结构而不同,或是否因工具包归还状态而改变。对于每个工具包激励状态组,每次调查响应的成本计算为:([邀请人数*激励前金额]+[回应人数*激励后金额])/回应人数。结果:总体而言,归还工具包组的调查反应高于未归还工具包组(42.6%比11.0%,P < 0.01),联合激励组(20.1%)高于无条件激励组(14.4%)(P = 0.01)。试剂盒返回状态没有改变激励类型和调查反应之间的关系(P = 0.52)。在被调查者中,完成调查的时间没有因激励类型而不同,无论是套件返回者还是非返回者。在返回者中,各组之间的每次调查成本相似(无条件13.57美元;14.15美元的总和);在不回国者中,无条件回国组的成本(57.78美元)高于联合回国组(25.22美元)。结论:综合激励措施对于提高卫生服务研究的调查响应具有成本效益,特别是在难以接触到的人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of different financial incentive structures on a web-based health survey: do timing and amount matter?

Aim: Financial incentives improve response to electronic health surveys, yet little is known about how unconditional incentives (guaranteed regardless of survey completion), conditional incentives, and various combinations of incentives influence response rates. We compared electronic health survey completion with two different financial incentive structures.

Methods: We invited women aged 30-64 years enrolled in a U.S. healthcare system and overdue for Pap screening to complete a web-based survey after receiving a mailed human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling kit in a pragmatic trial. HPV kit returners (n = 272) and non-returners (n = 1,083) were allocated to one of two different incentive structures: (1) Unconditional: $5 pre-incentive only (n = 653); (2) Combined: $2 pre-incentive plus $10 post-incentive conditional on completion (n = 702). Chi-square tests evaluated whether survey completion differed by incentive structure within kit return groups or was modified by kit return status. For each incentive-by-kit status group, the cost-per-survey response was calculated as: ([number invited*pre-incentive amount] + [number responses*post-incentive amount]) / number responses.

Results: Overall, survey response was higher in kit returners vs. kit non-returners (42.6% vs. 11.0%, P < 0.01), and survey response was higher in the combined (20.1%) vs. unconditional (14.4%) incentive group (P = 0.01). Kit return status did not modify the association between incentive type and survey response (P = 0.52). Among respondents, time to survey completion did not differ by incentive type among either kit returners or non-returners. Among returners, the cost-per-survey response was similar between groups ($13.57 unconditional; $14.15 combined); among non-returners, the cost was greater in the unconditional ($57.78) versus the combined ($25.22) group.

Conclusion: A combined incentive can be cost-effective for increasing survey response in health services research, particularly in hard-to-reach populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信