Tyler K Khilnani, Kathryn A Barth, Jensen K Henry, Agnes D Cororaton, Elizabeth A Cody, Carol A Mancuso, Scott J Ellis
{"title":"足踝手术术前期望与诊断的关系。","authors":"Tyler K Khilnani, Kathryn A Barth, Jensen K Henry, Agnes D Cororaton, Elizabeth A Cody, Carol A Mancuso, Scott J Ellis","doi":"10.1177/10711007231177035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been growing interest in patient-reported outcomes in foot and ankle surgery, and the fulfillment of patient expectations is a potentially powerful tool that compares preoperative expectations and perceived postoperative improvement. Prior work has validated the use of expectation fulfillment in foot and ankle surgery. However, given the wide spectrum of pathologies and treatments in foot and ankle, no study has examined the association between expectation fulfillment and specific diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study consisting of 266 patients who completed the Foot & Ankle Expectations Survey and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Survey (FAOS) preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. A fulfillment proportion (FP) was calculated using the pre- and postoperative Foot & Ankle Expectations Survey scores. An estimated mean fulfillment proportion for each diagnosis was calculated using a multivariable linear regression model, and pairwise comparisons were used to compare the FP between diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All diagnoses had an FP less than 1, indicating partially fulfilled expectations. Ankle arthritis had the highest FP (0.95, 95% CI 0.81-1.08), whereas neuromas and mid/hindfoot diagnoses had the lowest FPs (0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.68; 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.80). Higher preoperative expectations were correlated with lower fulfillment proportions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FP varied with diagnosis and preoperative expectations. An understanding of current expectation fulfillment among different diagnoses in foot and ankle surgery helps highlight areas for improvement in the management of expectations for presumed diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective review of prospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12446,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle International","volume":"44 8","pages":"710-718"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Fulfillment of Preoperative Expectations and Diagnosis in Foot and Ankle Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Tyler K Khilnani, Kathryn A Barth, Jensen K Henry, Agnes D Cororaton, Elizabeth A Cody, Carol A Mancuso, Scott J Ellis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10711007231177035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been growing interest in patient-reported outcomes in foot and ankle surgery, and the fulfillment of patient expectations is a potentially powerful tool that compares preoperative expectations and perceived postoperative improvement. Prior work has validated the use of expectation fulfillment in foot and ankle surgery. However, given the wide spectrum of pathologies and treatments in foot and ankle, no study has examined the association between expectation fulfillment and specific diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study consisting of 266 patients who completed the Foot & Ankle Expectations Survey and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Survey (FAOS) preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. A fulfillment proportion (FP) was calculated using the pre- and postoperative Foot & Ankle Expectations Survey scores. An estimated mean fulfillment proportion for each diagnosis was calculated using a multivariable linear regression model, and pairwise comparisons were used to compare the FP between diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All diagnoses had an FP less than 1, indicating partially fulfilled expectations. Ankle arthritis had the highest FP (0.95, 95% CI 0.81-1.08), whereas neuromas and mid/hindfoot diagnoses had the lowest FPs (0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.68; 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.80). Higher preoperative expectations were correlated with lower fulfillment proportions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FP varied with diagnosis and preoperative expectations. An understanding of current expectation fulfillment among different diagnoses in foot and ankle surgery helps highlight areas for improvement in the management of expectations for presumed diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective review of prospective cohort study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & Ankle International\",\"volume\":\"44 8\",\"pages\":\"710-718\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & Ankle International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007231177035\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007231177035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:人们对足部和踝关节手术患者报告的结果越来越感兴趣,患者期望的实现是比较术前期望和术后感知改善的潜在有力工具。先前的工作已经验证了期望实现在足部和踝关节手术中的应用。然而,鉴于足部和踝关节的病理和治疗范围广泛,没有研究检查期望实现与特定诊断之间的关系。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,包括266名患者,他们完成了术前和术后2年的足踝期望调查和足踝结果调查(FAOS)。使用术前和术后足踝期望调查评分计算完成比例(FP)。使用多变量线性回归模型计算每个诊断的估计平均实现比例,并使用两两比较来比较诊断之间的FP。结果:所有诊断的FP均小于1,表明部分满足预期。踝关节关节炎的FP最高(0.95,95% CI 0.81-1.08),而神经瘤和中后足诊断的FP最低(0.46,95% CI 0.23-0.68;0.62, 95% ci 0.45-0.80)。较高的术前期望与较低的完成比例相关。结论:FP随诊断和术前预期而变化。了解足部和踝关节手术中不同诊断的当前期望实现情况,有助于突出对假定诊断的期望管理的改进领域。证据等级:III级,前瞻性队列研究的回顾性评价。
Association Between Fulfillment of Preoperative Expectations and Diagnosis in Foot and Ankle Surgery.
Background: There has been growing interest in patient-reported outcomes in foot and ankle surgery, and the fulfillment of patient expectations is a potentially powerful tool that compares preoperative expectations and perceived postoperative improvement. Prior work has validated the use of expectation fulfillment in foot and ankle surgery. However, given the wide spectrum of pathologies and treatments in foot and ankle, no study has examined the association between expectation fulfillment and specific diagnosis.
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study consisting of 266 patients who completed the Foot & Ankle Expectations Survey and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Survey (FAOS) preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. A fulfillment proportion (FP) was calculated using the pre- and postoperative Foot & Ankle Expectations Survey scores. An estimated mean fulfillment proportion for each diagnosis was calculated using a multivariable linear regression model, and pairwise comparisons were used to compare the FP between diagnoses.
Results: All diagnoses had an FP less than 1, indicating partially fulfilled expectations. Ankle arthritis had the highest FP (0.95, 95% CI 0.81-1.08), whereas neuromas and mid/hindfoot diagnoses had the lowest FPs (0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.68; 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.80). Higher preoperative expectations were correlated with lower fulfillment proportions.
Conclusion: FP varied with diagnosis and preoperative expectations. An understanding of current expectation fulfillment among different diagnoses in foot and ankle surgery helps highlight areas for improvement in the management of expectations for presumed diagnoses.
Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective review of prospective cohort study.
期刊介绍:
Foot & Ankle International (FAI), in publication since 1980, is the official journal of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS). This monthly medical journal emphasizes surgical and medical management as it relates to the foot and ankle with a specific focus on reconstructive, trauma, and sports-related conditions utilizing the latest technological advances. FAI offers original, clinically oriented, peer-reviewed research articles presenting new approaches to foot and ankle pathology and treatment, current case reviews, and technique tips addressing the management of complex problems. This journal is an ideal resource for highly-trained orthopaedic foot and ankle specialists and allied health care providers.
The journal’s Founding Editor, Melvin H. Jahss, MD (deceased), served from 1980-1988. He was followed by Kenneth A. Johnson, MD (deceased) from 1988-1993; Lowell D. Lutter, MD (deceased) from 1993-2004; and E. Greer Richardson, MD from 2005-2007. David B. Thordarson, MD, assumed the role of Editor-in-Chief in 2008.
The journal focuses on the following areas of interest:
• Surgery
• Wound care
• Bone healing
• Pain management
• In-office orthotic systems
• Diabetes
• Sports medicine