{"title":"两种静脉镇静方法在儿童磁共振成像中的前瞻性、随机比较。","authors":"Viktor Mark Brzózka, Andrzej Jerzy Piotrowski","doi":"10.5114/ait.2023.128715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children usually need sedation or even anaesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. As there is no universally accepted method for this purpose we undertook a prospective, randomised comparison of propofol and dexmedetomidine in children aged 1 to 10 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After Institutional Board approval and parents' informed consent 64 ASA status I or II children scheduled for MRI scan were enrolled. Patients were premedicated with intravenous (IV) midazolam (0.1 mg kg -1 ) and ketamine (1 mg kg -1 ) and randomised to propofol (P) or dexmedetomidine (D) group. A propofol bolus of 1 mg kg -1 followed by infusion of 4 mg kg -1 h -1 , or dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg -1 followed by 2 µg kg -1 h-1 infusion were used. Heart rate, SpO 2 and non-invasive blood pressure were monitored and recorded at 5 min intervals. Results were compared by means of standard statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both dexmedetomidine and propofol after premedication with ketamine and midazolam are suitable for MRI sedation, although propofol use results in shorter recovery time. Less interventions are needed when dexmedetomidine is used.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"55 2","pages":"81-86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/96/99/AIT-55-50864.PMC10415600.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective, randomised comparison of two intravenous sedation methods for magnetic resonance imaging in children.\",\"authors\":\"Viktor Mark Brzózka, Andrzej Jerzy Piotrowski\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/ait.2023.128715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children usually need sedation or even anaesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. As there is no universally accepted method for this purpose we undertook a prospective, randomised comparison of propofol and dexmedetomidine in children aged 1 to 10 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After Institutional Board approval and parents' informed consent 64 ASA status I or II children scheduled for MRI scan were enrolled. Patients were premedicated with intravenous (IV) midazolam (0.1 mg kg -1 ) and ketamine (1 mg kg -1 ) and randomised to propofol (P) or dexmedetomidine (D) group. A propofol bolus of 1 mg kg -1 followed by infusion of 4 mg kg -1 h -1 , or dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg -1 followed by 2 µg kg -1 h-1 infusion were used. Heart rate, SpO 2 and non-invasive blood pressure were monitored and recorded at 5 min intervals. Results were compared by means of standard statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both dexmedetomidine and propofol after premedication with ketamine and midazolam are suitable for MRI sedation, although propofol use results in shorter recovery time. Less interventions are needed when dexmedetomidine is used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy\",\"volume\":\"55 2\",\"pages\":\"81-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/96/99/AIT-55-50864.PMC10415600.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2023.128715\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2023.128715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:儿童通常需要镇静甚至麻醉进行磁共振成像(MRI)研究。由于没有普遍接受的方法用于此目的,我们进行了一项前瞻性,随机比较异丙酚和右美托咪定在1至10岁儿童中的作用。方法:经机构委员会批准和家长知情同意后,纳入64名ASA状态为I或II的儿童,计划进行MRI扫描。患者预先静脉注射咪达唑仑(0.1 mg kg -1)和氯胺酮(1 mg kg -1),随机分为异丙酚(P)组或右美托咪定(D)组。采用异丙酚1 mg kg -1滴注4 mg kg -1 h-1,或右美托咪定1µg kg -1滴注2µg kg -1 h-1。每隔5分钟监测并记录心率、SpO 2和无创血压。采用标准统计学方法对结果进行比较。结果:氯胺酮、咪达唑仑预用药后右美托咪定和异丙酚均适用于MRI镇静,但异丙酚恢复时间较短。当使用右美托咪定时,需要较少的干预措施。
Prospective, randomised comparison of two intravenous sedation methods for magnetic resonance imaging in children.
Background: Children usually need sedation or even anaesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. As there is no universally accepted method for this purpose we undertook a prospective, randomised comparison of propofol and dexmedetomidine in children aged 1 to 10 years.
Methods: After Institutional Board approval and parents' informed consent 64 ASA status I or II children scheduled for MRI scan were enrolled. Patients were premedicated with intravenous (IV) midazolam (0.1 mg kg -1 ) and ketamine (1 mg kg -1 ) and randomised to propofol (P) or dexmedetomidine (D) group. A propofol bolus of 1 mg kg -1 followed by infusion of 4 mg kg -1 h -1 , or dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg -1 followed by 2 µg kg -1 h-1 infusion were used. Heart rate, SpO 2 and non-invasive blood pressure were monitored and recorded at 5 min intervals. Results were compared by means of standard statistical methods.
Results: Both dexmedetomidine and propofol after premedication with ketamine and midazolam are suitable for MRI sedation, although propofol use results in shorter recovery time. Less interventions are needed when dexmedetomidine is used.