Paula D Portella, Bruna C Dias, Patricia Ferreira, Juliana F de Souza, Leticia Wambier, Luciana Reichert da Silva Assunção
{"title":"发育性牙缺陷与初级牙列临床后果的关联:观察性研究的系统回顾。","authors":"Paula D Portella, Bruna C Dias, Patricia Ferreira, Juliana F de Souza, Leticia Wambier, Luciana Reichert da Silva Assunção","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Assess whether children with developmental defects of enamel (DDE) in primary teeth have a higher risk of having dental caries or a higher prevalence of clinical consequences due to the disease than those without DDE. <b>Methods:</b> Search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science™, Cochrane Library, LILACS, BBO, Embase databases and in gray literature. Three independent reviewers were involved in study selection, data extraction, and bias assessment. Risk of bias was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. DDE and its subtypes (demarcated opacities, hypoplasia, hypomineralized second primary molars (HSPM), and fluorosis) were regarded as exposure. Dental caries and clinical consequences of untreated caries were also assessed. In the meta-analyses, odds ratio (OR) was used in the random effects model for dichotomous outcomes. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). <b>Results:</b> The search yielded 5,750 studies, 39 of which were included in the systematic review and 20 in the meta-analysis. The risk of bias ranged from 4 to 9 points. Children with DDE were more prone to primary tooth caries (OR=2.79; 95% CI:1.29-6.03), and so were those with demarcated opacities (OR=1.75; 95% CI:1.09-2.78), hypoplasia (OR=2.84; 95% CI:1.73-4.67), and HSPM (OR=2.89; 95% CI:1.65-5.06). Fluorosis was not associated with caries (OR=1.39; 95% CI:0.97-1.98). Regarding tooth as a unit of analysis, DDE was highly associated with caries (OR=2.34; 95% CI:1.74-3.16). As for the clinical consequences of caries, only the qualitative analysis was conducted and there was no consensus in the studies. <b>Conclusion:</b> DDE is associated with higher primary tooth caries experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":19863,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"44 5","pages":"330-341"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association of Developmental Dental Defects and the Clinical Consequences in the Primary Dentition: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Paula D Portella, Bruna C Dias, Patricia Ferreira, Juliana F de Souza, Leticia Wambier, Luciana Reichert da Silva Assunção\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Assess whether children with developmental defects of enamel (DDE) in primary teeth have a higher risk of having dental caries or a higher prevalence of clinical consequences due to the disease than those without DDE. <b>Methods:</b> Search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science™, Cochrane Library, LILACS, BBO, Embase databases and in gray literature. Three independent reviewers were involved in study selection, data extraction, and bias assessment. Risk of bias was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. DDE and its subtypes (demarcated opacities, hypoplasia, hypomineralized second primary molars (HSPM), and fluorosis) were regarded as exposure. Dental caries and clinical consequences of untreated caries were also assessed. In the meta-analyses, odds ratio (OR) was used in the random effects model for dichotomous outcomes. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). <b>Results:</b> The search yielded 5,750 studies, 39 of which were included in the systematic review and 20 in the meta-analysis. The risk of bias ranged from 4 to 9 points. Children with DDE were more prone to primary tooth caries (OR=2.79; 95% CI:1.29-6.03), and so were those with demarcated opacities (OR=1.75; 95% CI:1.09-2.78), hypoplasia (OR=2.84; 95% CI:1.73-4.67), and HSPM (OR=2.89; 95% CI:1.65-5.06). Fluorosis was not associated with caries (OR=1.39; 95% CI:0.97-1.98). Regarding tooth as a unit of analysis, DDE was highly associated with caries (OR=2.34; 95% CI:1.74-3.16). As for the clinical consequences of caries, only the qualitative analysis was conducted and there was no consensus in the studies. <b>Conclusion:</b> DDE is associated with higher primary tooth caries experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric dentistry\",\"volume\":\"44 5\",\"pages\":\"330-341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估患有乳牙牙釉质发育缺陷(DDE)的儿童是否比没有DDE的儿童有更高的患龋风险或更高的临床后果发生率。方法:检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science™、Cochrane Library、LILACS、BBO、Embase数据库和灰色文献。研究选择、数据提取和偏倚评估均由三名独立审稿人参与。偏倚风险采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。DDE及其亚型(有界混浊、发育不全、第二乳牙低矿化和氟中毒)被认为是暴露。龋齿和未经治疗的龋齿的临床后果也进行了评估。在荟萃分析中,采用优势比(OR)作为二分类结果的随机效应模型。使用分级建议评估、发展和评价(GRADE)来评估证据质量。结果:检索结果为5750项研究,其中39项纳入系统综述,20项纳入荟萃分析。偏倚风险从4到9分不等。DDE患儿更容易患乳牙龋(OR=2.79;95% CI:1.29-6.03),界限模糊的患者也是如此(OR=1.75;95% CI:1.09-2.78),发育不全(OR=2.84;95% CI:1.73-4.67)和HSPM (OR=2.89;95%置信区间:1.65—-5.06)。氟中毒与龋齿无关(OR=1.39;95%置信区间:0.97—-1.98)。以牙齿为分析单位,DDE与龋齿高度相关(OR=2.34;95%置信区间:1.74—-3.16)。对于龋齿的临床后果,研究只进行了定性分析,尚无共识。结论:DDE与乳牙高龋率相关。
The Association of Developmental Dental Defects and the Clinical Consequences in the Primary Dentition: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.
Purpose: Assess whether children with developmental defects of enamel (DDE) in primary teeth have a higher risk of having dental caries or a higher prevalence of clinical consequences due to the disease than those without DDE. Methods: Search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science™, Cochrane Library, LILACS, BBO, Embase databases and in gray literature. Three independent reviewers were involved in study selection, data extraction, and bias assessment. Risk of bias was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. DDE and its subtypes (demarcated opacities, hypoplasia, hypomineralized second primary molars (HSPM), and fluorosis) were regarded as exposure. Dental caries and clinical consequences of untreated caries were also assessed. In the meta-analyses, odds ratio (OR) was used in the random effects model for dichotomous outcomes. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: The search yielded 5,750 studies, 39 of which were included in the systematic review and 20 in the meta-analysis. The risk of bias ranged from 4 to 9 points. Children with DDE were more prone to primary tooth caries (OR=2.79; 95% CI:1.29-6.03), and so were those with demarcated opacities (OR=1.75; 95% CI:1.09-2.78), hypoplasia (OR=2.84; 95% CI:1.73-4.67), and HSPM (OR=2.89; 95% CI:1.65-5.06). Fluorosis was not associated with caries (OR=1.39; 95% CI:0.97-1.98). Regarding tooth as a unit of analysis, DDE was highly associated with caries (OR=2.34; 95% CI:1.74-3.16). As for the clinical consequences of caries, only the qualitative analysis was conducted and there was no consensus in the studies. Conclusion: DDE is associated with higher primary tooth caries experience.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Dentistry is the official publication of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry. It is published bi-monthly and is internationally recognized as the leading journal in the area of pediatric dentistry. The journal promotes the practice, education and research specifically related to the specialty of pediatric dentistry. This peer-reviewed journal features scientific articles, case reports and abstracts of current pediatric dental research.