新一代前列腺癌同源重组修复基因组变异测序面临的挑战:中国一项全国性的调查和校准项目

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Huanwen Wu , Liqun Zhou , Xiaoyan Zhou , Qiang Wei , Nengtai Ouyang , Jianyong Shao , Jian Huang , Zhiyong Liang
{"title":"新一代前列腺癌同源重组修复基因组变异测序面临的挑战:中国一项全国性的调查和校准项目","authors":"Huanwen Wu ,&nbsp;Liqun Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Zhou ,&nbsp;Qiang Wei ,&nbsp;Nengtai Ouyang ,&nbsp;Jianyong Shao ,&nbsp;Jian Huang ,&nbsp;Zhiyong Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2022.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) is the most reliable and important signaling pathway for repairing DNA damage. We initiated a calibration project to better understand the NGS landscape for HRR gene testing in China, provide indications for testing standardization, and guide clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A questionnaire was used to collect laboratory information, panel design for HRR gene testing, tissue sample test parameters, plasma ctDNA sample test parameters, and procedures for variant interpretation. The testing quality of the participating laboratories was further evaluated by external quality assessment (EQA), which provided 5 FFPE slices and 5 mimic ctDNA samples as standard references for evaluation. Test results and reports were collected to assess laboratory performance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our results showed that different laboratories had significant differences in sequencing platforms, library construction technologies, genes in the testing panel, detectable mutation types, probe coverage regions, sequencing parameters, variants interpretation guidelines, and positive test rates. For the EQA test, the overall pass rate was about 60%. The average accuracy for tissue samples and ctDNA samples was 79.55% and 74.13%, respectively. It is worth noting that variants in tandem repetition regions and splice sites, and those with low allele frequency were more prone to misdetection. The most common reasons for misdetection were as follows: the testing panel did not cover the genes or the whole exon and splice sites of the genes; the variants were misclassified as benign or likely benign, and the variants failed the QC criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The discrepancies observed in our survey and EQA test affect the authenticity of HRR gene test results for prostate cancer, underlining the need to establish guidelines for HRR gene testing and variant interpretation in China, and to optimize HRR gene testing in clinical practice to improve management and patient care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":"10 4","pages":"Pages 181-187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d4/16/main.PMC9747577.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in next generation sequencing of homology recombination repair genomic variants in prostate cancer: A nationwide survey and calibration project in China\",\"authors\":\"Huanwen Wu ,&nbsp;Liqun Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Zhou ,&nbsp;Qiang Wei ,&nbsp;Nengtai Ouyang ,&nbsp;Jianyong Shao ,&nbsp;Jian Huang ,&nbsp;Zhiyong Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prnil.2022.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) is the most reliable and important signaling pathway for repairing DNA damage. We initiated a calibration project to better understand the NGS landscape for HRR gene testing in China, provide indications for testing standardization, and guide clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A questionnaire was used to collect laboratory information, panel design for HRR gene testing, tissue sample test parameters, plasma ctDNA sample test parameters, and procedures for variant interpretation. The testing quality of the participating laboratories was further evaluated by external quality assessment (EQA), which provided 5 FFPE slices and 5 mimic ctDNA samples as standard references for evaluation. Test results and reports were collected to assess laboratory performance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our results showed that different laboratories had significant differences in sequencing platforms, library construction technologies, genes in the testing panel, detectable mutation types, probe coverage regions, sequencing parameters, variants interpretation guidelines, and positive test rates. For the EQA test, the overall pass rate was about 60%. The average accuracy for tissue samples and ctDNA samples was 79.55% and 74.13%, respectively. It is worth noting that variants in tandem repetition regions and splice sites, and those with low allele frequency were more prone to misdetection. The most common reasons for misdetection were as follows: the testing panel did not cover the genes or the whole exon and splice sites of the genes; the variants were misclassified as benign or likely benign, and the variants failed the QC criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The discrepancies observed in our survey and EQA test affect the authenticity of HRR gene test results for prostate cancer, underlining the need to establish guidelines for HRR gene testing and variant interpretation in China, and to optimize HRR gene testing in clinical practice to improve management and patient care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate International\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 181-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d4/16/main.PMC9747577.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888222000411\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888222000411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

同源重组修复(homologous Recombination Repair, HRR)是修复DNA损伤最可靠、最重要的信号通路。我们启动了一项校准项目,以更好地了解中国HRR基因检测的NGS格局,为检测标准化提供指征,并指导临床实践。方法采用问卷调查法收集实验室资料、HRR基因检测面板设计、组织样本检测参数、血浆ctDNA样本检测参数及变异解释程序。通过外部质量评价(EQA)进一步评价各参与实验室的检测质量,提供5个FFPE切片和5个模拟ctDNA样品作为评价标准参考。收集测试结果和报告以评估实验室的表现。结果不同实验室在测序平台、文库构建技术、检测组基因、可检测突变类型、探针覆盖区域、测序参数、变异解释指南、阳性检测率等方面存在显著差异。对于EQA测试,总体通过率约为60%。组织样本和ctDNA样本的平均准确率分别为79.55%和74.13%。值得注意的是,串联重复区和剪接位点的变异以及等位基因频率较低的变异更容易被误检。最常见的误检原因是:检测组没有覆盖基因或基因的整个外显子和剪接位点;变体被错误地分类为良性或可能良性,变体未能达到质量控制标准。结论本调查结果与EQA检测结果存在差异,影响了前列腺癌HRR基因检测结果的真实性,需要在中国建立HRR基因检测和变异解释指南,优化HRR基因检测在临床实践中的应用,以改善管理和患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges in next generation sequencing of homology recombination repair genomic variants in prostate cancer: A nationwide survey and calibration project in China

Background

Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) is the most reliable and important signaling pathway for repairing DNA damage. We initiated a calibration project to better understand the NGS landscape for HRR gene testing in China, provide indications for testing standardization, and guide clinical practice.

Methods

A questionnaire was used to collect laboratory information, panel design for HRR gene testing, tissue sample test parameters, plasma ctDNA sample test parameters, and procedures for variant interpretation. The testing quality of the participating laboratories was further evaluated by external quality assessment (EQA), which provided 5 FFPE slices and 5 mimic ctDNA samples as standard references for evaluation. Test results and reports were collected to assess laboratory performance.

Results

Our results showed that different laboratories had significant differences in sequencing platforms, library construction technologies, genes in the testing panel, detectable mutation types, probe coverage regions, sequencing parameters, variants interpretation guidelines, and positive test rates. For the EQA test, the overall pass rate was about 60%. The average accuracy for tissue samples and ctDNA samples was 79.55% and 74.13%, respectively. It is worth noting that variants in tandem repetition regions and splice sites, and those with low allele frequency were more prone to misdetection. The most common reasons for misdetection were as follows: the testing panel did not cover the genes or the whole exon and splice sites of the genes; the variants were misclassified as benign or likely benign, and the variants failed the QC criteria.

Conclusions

The discrepancies observed in our survey and EQA test affect the authenticity of HRR gene test results for prostate cancer, underlining the need to establish guidelines for HRR gene testing and variant interpretation in China, and to optimize HRR gene testing in clinical practice to improve management and patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate International
Prostate International Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
26.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Prostate International (Prostate Int, PI), the official English-language journal of Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to basic and clinical studies on prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and ...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信