药物使用者的身份如何影响公众对阿片类药物政策的看法。

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Justin de Benedictis-Kessner, Michael Hankinson
{"title":"药物使用者的身份如何影响公众对阿片类药物政策的看法。","authors":"Justin de Benedictis-Kessner, Michael Hankinson","doi":"10.1007/s11109-022-09845-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How do media portrayals of potential policy beneficiaries' identities sway public support for these policies in a public health setting? Using a pre-registered vignette experiment, we show that the racial identity of substance users depicted in news media shapes public opinion on policies to address the opioid crisis. People display biases in favor of their own racial identity group that manifest in their support for both treatment-based policies and punitive policies. We show that these biases may be moderated by the type of initial drug used by a substance user and associated levels of perceived blame. Extending theories of group politics, we also assess favoritism based on gender and residential context identities, but find no such biases. These results highlight the continued centrality of race in the formation of policy preferences.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11109-022-09845-8.</p>","PeriodicalId":48166,"journal":{"name":"Political Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9765388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How the Identity of Substance Users Shapes Public Opinion on Opioid Policy.\",\"authors\":\"Justin de Benedictis-Kessner, Michael Hankinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11109-022-09845-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>How do media portrayals of potential policy beneficiaries' identities sway public support for these policies in a public health setting? Using a pre-registered vignette experiment, we show that the racial identity of substance users depicted in news media shapes public opinion on policies to address the opioid crisis. People display biases in favor of their own racial identity group that manifest in their support for both treatment-based policies and punitive policies. We show that these biases may be moderated by the type of initial drug used by a substance user and associated levels of perceived blame. Extending theories of group politics, we also assess favoritism based on gender and residential context identities, but find no such biases. These results highlight the continued centrality of race in the formation of policy preferences.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11109-022-09845-8.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9765388/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09845-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09845-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在公共卫生环境中,媒体对潜在政策受益者身份的描述如何左右公众对这些政策的支持?通过预先登记的小实验,我们发现新闻媒体对药物使用者种族身份的描述会影响公众对解决阿片类药物危机政策的看法。人们会表现出有利于自己种族身份群体的偏见,这种偏见体现在他们对基于治疗的政策和惩罚性政策的支持上。我们的研究表明,这些偏见可能会受到药物使用者最初使用的药物类型以及相关的责任认知水平的影响。根据群体政治理论的延伸,我们还评估了基于性别和居住环境身份的偏好,但没有发现此类偏差。这些结果凸显了种族在政策偏好形成过程中的核心地位:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s11109-022-09845-8。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How the Identity of Substance Users Shapes Public Opinion on Opioid Policy.

How the Identity of Substance Users Shapes Public Opinion on Opioid Policy.

How the Identity of Substance Users Shapes Public Opinion on Opioid Policy.

How the Identity of Substance Users Shapes Public Opinion on Opioid Policy.

How do media portrayals of potential policy beneficiaries' identities sway public support for these policies in a public health setting? Using a pre-registered vignette experiment, we show that the racial identity of substance users depicted in news media shapes public opinion on policies to address the opioid crisis. People display biases in favor of their own racial identity group that manifest in their support for both treatment-based policies and punitive policies. We show that these biases may be moderated by the type of initial drug used by a substance user and associated levels of perceived blame. Extending theories of group politics, we also assess favoritism based on gender and residential context identities, but find no such biases. These results highlight the continued centrality of race in the formation of policy preferences.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11109-022-09845-8.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Political Behavior
Political Behavior POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Political Behavior publishes original research in the general fields of political behavior, institutions, processes, and policies. Approaches include economic (preference structuring, bargaining), psychological (attitude formation and change, motivations, perceptions), sociological (roles, group, class), or political (decision making, coalitions, influence). Articles focus on the political behavior (conventional or unconventional) of the individual person or small group (microanalysis), or of large organizations that participate in the political process such as parties, interest groups, political action committees, governmental agencies, and mass media (macroanalysis). As an interdisciplinary journal, Political Behavior integrates various approaches across different levels of theoretical abstraction and empirical domain (contextual analysis). Officially cited as: Polit Behav
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信