A群链球菌快速抗原检测试剂的比较研究

Eisuke Nakano, Shinobu Koyama, Megumi Imai, Yoshimi Machida, Takefumi Sakanoue, Tsuyoshi Nakahara, Yuji Yaguchi, Kiyoko Tamai, Kiyofumi Ohkusu
{"title":"A群链球菌快速抗原检测试剂的比较研究","authors":"Eisuke Nakano,&nbsp;Shinobu Koyama,&nbsp;Megumi Imai,&nbsp;Yoshimi Machida,&nbsp;Takefumi Sakanoue,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Nakahara,&nbsp;Yuji Yaguchi,&nbsp;Kiyoko Tamai,&nbsp;Kiyofumi Ohkusu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We compared rapid antigen detection kits widely used for the rapid diagnosis of group A streptococcal pharyngitis, evaluating their minimum detection sensitivity and operability in five levels. Five kits based on the immunochromatographic method were used: ImunoAce Strep A (Tauns), ImunoAce Strep A Neo (Tauns), Quick Navi-StrepA2 (Denka), Quick Vue Dipstick Strep A (SB Bioscience) and RapidTesta Strep A (SEKISUI MEDICAL). Thirteen strains were tested: 10 clinical isolates of <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i>, 2 strains of <i>Streptococcus dysgalactiae</i> subsp. <i>equisimilis</i> (SDSE), and <i>S. pyogenes</i> ATCC 19615. All kits had the same or higher minimum detection sensitivity than previously reported. ImunoAce StrepA Neo had the highest detection sensitivity and the best overall evaluation among the group A streptococcal rapid antigen detection kits used in this study. The detection sensitivity of SDSE with group A polysaccharide antigen was comparable to that of <i>S. pyogenes</i>. Although culture tests are necessary to confirm the causative organism, SDSE may present with clinical symptoms similar to those of <i>S. pyogenes</i>, and detection with a rapid antigen detection kit may be of therapeutic value.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"32 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparative Study of Rapid Antigen Test Reagents for Group A <i>Streptococcus</i> spp.]\",\"authors\":\"Eisuke Nakano,&nbsp;Shinobu Koyama,&nbsp;Megumi Imai,&nbsp;Yoshimi Machida,&nbsp;Takefumi Sakanoue,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Nakahara,&nbsp;Yuji Yaguchi,&nbsp;Kiyoko Tamai,&nbsp;Kiyofumi Ohkusu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We compared rapid antigen detection kits widely used for the rapid diagnosis of group A streptococcal pharyngitis, evaluating their minimum detection sensitivity and operability in five levels. Five kits based on the immunochromatographic method were used: ImunoAce Strep A (Tauns), ImunoAce Strep A Neo (Tauns), Quick Navi-StrepA2 (Denka), Quick Vue Dipstick Strep A (SB Bioscience) and RapidTesta Strep A (SEKISUI MEDICAL). Thirteen strains were tested: 10 clinical isolates of <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i>, 2 strains of <i>Streptococcus dysgalactiae</i> subsp. <i>equisimilis</i> (SDSE), and <i>S. pyogenes</i> ATCC 19615. All kits had the same or higher minimum detection sensitivity than previously reported. ImunoAce StrepA Neo had the highest detection sensitivity and the best overall evaluation among the group A streptococcal rapid antigen detection kits used in this study. The detection sensitivity of SDSE with group A polysaccharide antigen was comparable to that of <i>S. pyogenes</i>. Although culture tests are necessary to confirm the causative organism, SDSE may present with clinical symptoms similar to those of <i>S. pyogenes</i>, and detection with a rapid antigen detection kit may be of therapeutic value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对目前广泛应用于A组链球菌性咽炎快速诊断的快速抗原检测试剂盒进行比较,从5个层面评价其最低检测灵敏度和可操作性。采用免疫层分析法的5种试剂盒:immunoace StrepA (Tauns)、immunoace StrepA Neo (Tauns)、Quick Navi-StrepA2 (Denka)、Quick Vue Dipstick StrepA (SB Bioscience)和RapidTesta StrepA (SEKISUI MEDICAL)。共检测13株:临床分离的化脓性链球菌10株,泌乳不良链球菌2株。SDSE和ATCC 19615。所有试剂盒的最低检测灵敏度与先前报道的相同或更高。在本研究使用的A组链球菌快速抗原检测试剂盒中,ImunoAce StrepA Neo的检测灵敏度最高,综合评价最好。A组多糖抗原对SDSE的检测灵敏度与化脓性链球菌相当。虽然需要进行培养试验来确认病原,但SDSE可能表现出与化脓性链球菌相似的临床症状,使用快速抗原检测试剂盒进行检测可能具有治疗价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Comparative Study of Rapid Antigen Test Reagents for Group A Streptococcus spp.]

We compared rapid antigen detection kits widely used for the rapid diagnosis of group A streptococcal pharyngitis, evaluating their minimum detection sensitivity and operability in five levels. Five kits based on the immunochromatographic method were used: ImunoAce Strep A (Tauns), ImunoAce Strep A Neo (Tauns), Quick Navi-StrepA2 (Denka), Quick Vue Dipstick Strep A (SB Bioscience) and RapidTesta Strep A (SEKISUI MEDICAL). Thirteen strains were tested: 10 clinical isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes, 2 strains of Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (SDSE), and S. pyogenes ATCC 19615. All kits had the same or higher minimum detection sensitivity than previously reported. ImunoAce StrepA Neo had the highest detection sensitivity and the best overall evaluation among the group A streptococcal rapid antigen detection kits used in this study. The detection sensitivity of SDSE with group A polysaccharide antigen was comparable to that of S. pyogenes. Although culture tests are necessary to confirm the causative organism, SDSE may present with clinical symptoms similar to those of S. pyogenes, and detection with a rapid antigen detection kit may be of therapeutic value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信