中欧非殖民化:捷克艺术与“殖民地清白”问题。

Matthew Rampley
{"title":"中欧非殖民化:捷克艺术与“殖民地清白”问题。","authors":"Matthew Rampley","doi":"10.1080/01973762.2022.2087168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent call to decolonize art history and the institutions of art have largely focused on the legacies of the major European and American colonial powers, such as Britain, France, Spain and the United States. Positioning Europe at the heart of modernity/coloniality prompts questions to do with how to place the states and cultures of east central Europe, none of which had colonial territories or engaged in projects of expropriation and colonial exploitation. It was along assumed that states such as Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic were little touched by the debate over decolonization, precisely because they had no overseas colonial empires. Belief in ‘colonial innocence’ was an important aspect of national self-definition. This article examines this conviction with reference to the specific case of the Czech lands and Czechoslovakia. Looking at practices of cultural representation, museum collecting and architecture in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, it suggests that the idea of colonial innocence is open to interrogation.","PeriodicalId":75309,"journal":{"name":"Visual resources : VR","volume":"37 1","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4f/a9/GVIR_37_2087168.PMC9767313.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decolonizing Central Europe: Czech Art and the Question of 'Colonial Innocence'.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Rampley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01973762.2022.2087168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recent call to decolonize art history and the institutions of art have largely focused on the legacies of the major European and American colonial powers, such as Britain, France, Spain and the United States. Positioning Europe at the heart of modernity/coloniality prompts questions to do with how to place the states and cultures of east central Europe, none of which had colonial territories or engaged in projects of expropriation and colonial exploitation. It was along assumed that states such as Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic were little touched by the debate over decolonization, precisely because they had no overseas colonial empires. Belief in ‘colonial innocence’ was an important aspect of national self-definition. This article examines this conviction with reference to the specific case of the Czech lands and Czechoslovakia. Looking at practices of cultural representation, museum collecting and architecture in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, it suggests that the idea of colonial innocence is open to interrogation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visual resources : VR\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"1-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4f/a9/GVIR_37_2087168.PMC9767313.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visual resources : VR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2022.2087168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual resources : VR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2022.2087168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

最近呼吁艺术史和艺术机构去殖民化的呼声主要集中在欧洲和美国主要殖民大国的遗产上,比如英国、法国、西班牙和美国。将欧洲定位于现代性/殖民主义的中心,引发了如何定位中东欧国家和文化的问题,这些国家和文化都没有殖民领土,也没有参与征收和殖民剥削的项目。人们一直认为,波兰、匈牙利和捷克共和国等国很少受到非殖民化辩论的影响,正是因为它们没有海外殖民帝国。相信“殖民地清白”是国家自我定义的一个重要方面。本文参照捷克土地和捷克斯洛伐克的具体情况审查这一信念。从19世纪和20世纪初的文化表现、博物馆收藏和建筑实践来看,它表明殖民纯真的观念是值得质疑的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Decolonizing Central Europe: Czech Art and the Question of 'Colonial Innocence'.

Decolonizing Central Europe: Czech Art and the Question of 'Colonial Innocence'.

Decolonizing Central Europe: Czech Art and the Question of 'Colonial Innocence'.

Decolonizing Central Europe: Czech Art and the Question of 'Colonial Innocence'.
The recent call to decolonize art history and the institutions of art have largely focused on the legacies of the major European and American colonial powers, such as Britain, France, Spain and the United States. Positioning Europe at the heart of modernity/coloniality prompts questions to do with how to place the states and cultures of east central Europe, none of which had colonial territories or engaged in projects of expropriation and colonial exploitation. It was along assumed that states such as Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic were little touched by the debate over decolonization, precisely because they had no overseas colonial empires. Belief in ‘colonial innocence’ was an important aspect of national self-definition. This article examines this conviction with reference to the specific case of the Czech lands and Czechoslovakia. Looking at practices of cultural representation, museum collecting and architecture in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, it suggests that the idea of colonial innocence is open to interrogation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信