硅胶乳房植入物:过去,现在和未来。

IF 0.2 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Aleksandra Pirjavec Mahić, Damir Grebić, Paola Čargonja, Domagoj Kustić
{"title":"硅胶乳房植入物:过去,现在和未来。","authors":"Aleksandra Pirjavec Mahić,&nbsp;Damir Grebić,&nbsp;Paola Čargonja,&nbsp;Domagoj Kustić","doi":"10.31952/amha.18.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors have provided an in-depth review of the history of saline and silicone gel-filled breast implants. In the history of medicine, no devices have been more scrutinized and thoroughly studied than breast implants. Although we as plastic surgeons recognize and appreciate the benefits that our patients derive from these devices, society as a whole continues to remain skeptical. The reasons for this are complex and multifactorial but appear to be fueled by the media, oppositional organizations, and several trial lawyers. Prior to 1990, when the silicone gel implant controversy began, there were only eight indexed publications that dealt with the issue of silicone gel breast implants. Since 1990, there have been more than 500 indexed publications dealing with silicone gel implants. At the time of the moratorium in 1992, we as plastic surgeons did not have a leg to stand on because there was a paucity of scientific evidence to support our observations that silicone breast implants were safe and effective devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":42656,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica","volume":"18 1","pages":"165-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Silicone Gel Breast Implants: Past, Present, and Future.\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandra Pirjavec Mahić,&nbsp;Damir Grebić,&nbsp;Paola Čargonja,&nbsp;Domagoj Kustić\",\"doi\":\"10.31952/amha.18.1.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The authors have provided an in-depth review of the history of saline and silicone gel-filled breast implants. In the history of medicine, no devices have been more scrutinized and thoroughly studied than breast implants. Although we as plastic surgeons recognize and appreciate the benefits that our patients derive from these devices, society as a whole continues to remain skeptical. The reasons for this are complex and multifactorial but appear to be fueled by the media, oppositional organizations, and several trial lawyers. Prior to 1990, when the silicone gel implant controversy began, there were only eight indexed publications that dealt with the issue of silicone gel breast implants. Since 1990, there have been more than 500 indexed publications dealing with silicone gel implants. At the time of the moratorium in 1992, we as plastic surgeons did not have a leg to stand on because there was a paucity of scientific evidence to support our observations that silicone breast implants were safe and effective devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"165-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31952/amha.18.1.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31952/amha.18.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

作者提供了一个深入的历史回顾生理盐水和硅胶填充乳房植入物。在医学史上,没有一种器械比隆胸植入物得到了更仔细和彻底的研究。尽管作为整形外科医生的我们认识到并欣赏我们的病人从这些设备中获得的好处,但整个社会仍然持怀疑态度。造成这种情况的原因是复杂和多方面的,但似乎是由媒体、反对组织和几名出庭律师推动的。在1990年之前,当硅胶植入物的争议开始时,只有8篇索引出版物涉及硅胶乳房植入物的问题。自1990年以来,已经有超过500篇关于硅胶植入物的索引出版物。在1992年禁令颁布的时候,作为整形外科医生的我们没有依据,因为没有科学证据支持我们的观察,硅胶隆胸植入物是安全有效的设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Silicone Gel Breast Implants: Past, Present, and Future.

The authors have provided an in-depth review of the history of saline and silicone gel-filled breast implants. In the history of medicine, no devices have been more scrutinized and thoroughly studied than breast implants. Although we as plastic surgeons recognize and appreciate the benefits that our patients derive from these devices, society as a whole continues to remain skeptical. The reasons for this are complex and multifactorial but appear to be fueled by the media, oppositional organizations, and several trial lawyers. Prior to 1990, when the silicone gel implant controversy began, there were only eight indexed publications that dealt with the issue of silicone gel breast implants. Since 1990, there have been more than 500 indexed publications dealing with silicone gel implants. At the time of the moratorium in 1992, we as plastic surgeons did not have a leg to stand on because there was a paucity of scientific evidence to support our observations that silicone breast implants were safe and effective devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica
Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信