通过评价肺活量测定结果比较哮喘、COPD和ACOS患者的治疗反应。

Mohammad Esmaeil Hejazi, Zahra Pakzad, Horieh Shojaan, Niusha Kalami, Veghar Hejazi, Tahereh Vaezi
{"title":"通过评价肺活量测定结果比较哮喘、COPD和ACOS患者的治疗反应。","authors":"Mohammad Esmaeil Hejazi,&nbsp;Zahra Pakzad,&nbsp;Horieh Shojaan,&nbsp;Niusha Kalami,&nbsp;Veghar Hejazi,&nbsp;Tahereh Vaezi","doi":"10.47750/jptcp.2022.993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Asthma and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD ) both are a common public health problem that affects a large portion of population. Nearly 20% of patients with obstructive lung disease have features of both asthma and COPD called ACOS that GOLD_GINA guidelines defines as persistent airflow limitation with several features of asthma and several features of COPD. Yet there is a little data available about diagnosis and treatment of this entity and current study aimed to compare therapeutic response between asthma, COPD and Asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) subjects through spirometric data. In the present cross-sectional study, 30 known patients with mild to moderate asthma, 30 known patients with mild to moderate COPD and 30 known patients with mild to moderate ACOS according to GOLD_GINA guidelines were enrolled. We assessed post bronchodilator the ratio of the forced expiratory volume in the first one second to the forced vital capacity of the lungs (fev1) and the forced expiratory volume in the first one second to the forced vital capacity of the lungs (fev1/fvc) in all patients. Then they took standard treatment for 2 months and after this period spirometry was repeated. Spirometric data's changes was compared between the three groups by SPSS26 statistical software. Fev1 changes in response to treatment did not differ significantly between three groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05) but fev1/fvc changes differed significantly and this parameter in asthma was more than ACOS and in COPD was least. (In asthma, spirometric symbolized therapeutic response is more significant than ACOS, and in ACOS, it is more important than COPD in terms of fev1/fvc changes) and there was not any difference between the three groups regarding to FEV1 changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology = Journal de la therapeutique des populations et de la pharmacologie clinique","volume":"29 4","pages":"e195-e201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of therapeutic response between asthma, COPD, and ACOS patients by evaluation of spirometric findings.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Esmaeil Hejazi,&nbsp;Zahra Pakzad,&nbsp;Horieh Shojaan,&nbsp;Niusha Kalami,&nbsp;Veghar Hejazi,&nbsp;Tahereh Vaezi\",\"doi\":\"10.47750/jptcp.2022.993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Asthma and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD ) both are a common public health problem that affects a large portion of population. Nearly 20% of patients with obstructive lung disease have features of both asthma and COPD called ACOS that GOLD_GINA guidelines defines as persistent airflow limitation with several features of asthma and several features of COPD. Yet there is a little data available about diagnosis and treatment of this entity and current study aimed to compare therapeutic response between asthma, COPD and Asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) subjects through spirometric data. In the present cross-sectional study, 30 known patients with mild to moderate asthma, 30 known patients with mild to moderate COPD and 30 known patients with mild to moderate ACOS according to GOLD_GINA guidelines were enrolled. We assessed post bronchodilator the ratio of the forced expiratory volume in the first one second to the forced vital capacity of the lungs (fev1) and the forced expiratory volume in the first one second to the forced vital capacity of the lungs (fev1/fvc) in all patients. Then they took standard treatment for 2 months and after this period spirometry was repeated. Spirometric data's changes was compared between the three groups by SPSS26 statistical software. Fev1 changes in response to treatment did not differ significantly between three groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05) but fev1/fvc changes differed significantly and this parameter in asthma was more than ACOS and in COPD was least. (In asthma, spirometric symbolized therapeutic response is more significant than ACOS, and in ACOS, it is more important than COPD in terms of fev1/fvc changes) and there was not any difference between the three groups regarding to FEV1 changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology = Journal de la therapeutique des populations et de la pharmacologie clinique\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"e195-e201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology = Journal de la therapeutique des populations et de la pharmacologie clinique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47750/jptcp.2022.993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology = Journal de la therapeutique des populations et de la pharmacologie clinique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47750/jptcp.2022.993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)都是影响很大一部分人口的常见公共卫生问题。近20%的阻塞性肺疾病患者同时具有哮喘和COPD的特征,称为ACOS, GOLD_GINA指南将其定义为具有哮喘和COPD的几个特征的持续气流限制。然而,关于该实体的诊断和治疗的数据很少,目前的研究旨在通过肺活量测量数据比较哮喘,COPD和哮喘-COPD重叠综合征(ACOS)受试者的治疗反应。本横断面研究纳入30例已知轻中度哮喘患者、30例已知轻中度COPD患者和30例已知轻中度ACOS患者,均符合GOLD_GINA指南。我们评估了所有患者使用支气管扩张剂后第一秒用力呼气量与肺用力肺活量(fev1)的比值,以及第一秒用力呼气量与肺用力肺活量(fev1/fvc)的比值。然后给予标准治疗2个月,在此期间重复肺活量测定。采用SPSS26统计软件比较三组肺活量数据的变化。三组间Fev1对治疗反应的变化差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05),但Fev1 /fvc变化差异有统计学意义,哮喘组高于ACOS组,COPD组最低。(在哮喘中,肺活量计的治疗反应比ACOS更显著,在ACOS中,fev1/fvc变化比COPD更重要),三组之间fev1变化无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of therapeutic response between asthma, COPD, and ACOS patients by evaluation of spirometric findings.

Asthma and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD ) both are a common public health problem that affects a large portion of population. Nearly 20% of patients with obstructive lung disease have features of both asthma and COPD called ACOS that GOLD_GINA guidelines defines as persistent airflow limitation with several features of asthma and several features of COPD. Yet there is a little data available about diagnosis and treatment of this entity and current study aimed to compare therapeutic response between asthma, COPD and Asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) subjects through spirometric data. In the present cross-sectional study, 30 known patients with mild to moderate asthma, 30 known patients with mild to moderate COPD and 30 known patients with mild to moderate ACOS according to GOLD_GINA guidelines were enrolled. We assessed post bronchodilator the ratio of the forced expiratory volume in the first one second to the forced vital capacity of the lungs (fev1) and the forced expiratory volume in the first one second to the forced vital capacity of the lungs (fev1/fvc) in all patients. Then they took standard treatment for 2 months and after this period spirometry was repeated. Spirometric data's changes was compared between the three groups by SPSS26 statistical software. Fev1 changes in response to treatment did not differ significantly between three groups (p > 0.05) but fev1/fvc changes differed significantly and this parameter in asthma was more than ACOS and in COPD was least. (In asthma, spirometric symbolized therapeutic response is more significant than ACOS, and in ACOS, it is more important than COPD in terms of fev1/fvc changes) and there was not any difference between the three groups regarding to FEV1 changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信