褪黑素预防成人偏头痛的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-28 DOI:10.11607/ofph.3211
Haridas Mundot Puliappadamb, Rituparna Maiti, Archana Mishra, Monalisa Jena, Biswa Ranjan Mishra
{"title":"褪黑素预防成人偏头痛的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Haridas Mundot Puliappadamb, Rituparna Maiti, Archana Mishra, Monalisa Jena, Biswa Ranjan Mishra","doi":"10.11607/ofph.3211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of melatonin for migraine prophylaxis in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After a comprehensive literature search in the MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, and International Clinical Trial Registry Platform databases, reviewers extracted data from three relevant articles. PRISMA guidelines were followed in the selection, analysis, and reporting of the findings. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. A random-effects model was used to estimate the effect size, and meta-regression was performed for variables with a likely influence on effect size. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the comparison used in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Melatonin therapy in migraine was associated with a significantly higher responder rate when compared to both placebo and standard therapy (OR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.08 to 3.14; P = .03). The results of the meta-analyses indicated that melatonin can achieve a significant reduction in frequency of migraine attacks (MD = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.02 to 1.98; P = .04), migraine attack duration (MD = 5.02; 95% CI: 0. 91 to 9.13; P = .02), use of analgesics (MD = 1.43; 95% CI: 0.38 to 2.48; P = .008), and migraine severity (MD = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.63; P < .0001) over placebo, but had no significant effects in comparison to amitriptyline or valproate. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of common adverse drug reactions, such as drowsiness and fatigue, between the melatonin group and the comparison groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Melatonin showed a beneficial prophylactic role in migraine, with a better responder rate in comparison to placebo in reducing migraine severity, mean attack duration, mean attack frequency, and analgesic use, but did not show significant effects in comparison to amitriptyline or valproate.</p>","PeriodicalId":48800,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache","volume":"36 3-4","pages":"207–219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10586587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Melatonin as Prophylaxis for Migraine in Adults: A Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Haridas Mundot Puliappadamb, Rituparna Maiti, Archana Mishra, Monalisa Jena, Biswa Ranjan Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ofph.3211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of melatonin for migraine prophylaxis in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After a comprehensive literature search in the MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, and International Clinical Trial Registry Platform databases, reviewers extracted data from three relevant articles. PRISMA guidelines were followed in the selection, analysis, and reporting of the findings. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. A random-effects model was used to estimate the effect size, and meta-regression was performed for variables with a likely influence on effect size. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the comparison used in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Melatonin therapy in migraine was associated with a significantly higher responder rate when compared to both placebo and standard therapy (OR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.08 to 3.14; P = .03). The results of the meta-analyses indicated that melatonin can achieve a significant reduction in frequency of migraine attacks (MD = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.02 to 1.98; P = .04), migraine attack duration (MD = 5.02; 95% CI: 0. 91 to 9.13; P = .02), use of analgesics (MD = 1.43; 95% CI: 0.38 to 2.48; P = .008), and migraine severity (MD = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.63; P < .0001) over placebo, but had no significant effects in comparison to amitriptyline or valproate. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of common adverse drug reactions, such as drowsiness and fatigue, between the melatonin group and the comparison groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Melatonin showed a beneficial prophylactic role in migraine, with a better responder rate in comparison to placebo in reducing migraine severity, mean attack duration, mean attack frequency, and analgesic use, but did not show significant effects in comparison to amitriptyline or valproate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache\",\"volume\":\"36 3-4\",\"pages\":\"207–219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10586587/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ofph.3211\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ofph.3211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价褪黑素预防成人偏头痛的疗效和安全性。方法:在MEDLINE、Cochrane数据库和国际临床试验注册平台数据库中进行全面的文献检索后,审稿人从3篇相关文章中提取数据。在选择、分析和报告结果时遵循PRISMA指南。采用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具进行质量评估。随机效应模型用于估计效应大小,并对可能影响效应大小的变量进行元回归。根据纳入研究中使用的比较进行亚组分析。结果:与安慰剂和标准治疗相比,褪黑素治疗偏头痛的应答率明显更高(OR = 1.84;95% CI: 1.08 ~ 3.14;P = .03)。meta分析结果表明,褪黑素可以显著降低偏头痛发作频率(MD = 1.00;95% CI: 0.02 ~ 1.98;P = .04)、偏头痛发作时间(MD = 5.02;95% ci: 0。91 ~ 9.13;P = 0.02)、镇痛药使用情况(MD = 1.43;95% CI: 0.38 ~ 2.48;P = 0.008),偏头痛严重程度(MD = 1.93;95% CI: 1.23 ~ 2.63;P < 0.0001)优于安慰剂,但与阿米替林或丙戊酸盐相比无显著影响。褪黑素组与对照组在嗜睡、疲劳等常见药物不良反应的发生方面无显著差异。结论:褪黑素在偏头痛中显示出有益的预防作用,在降低偏头痛严重程度、平均发作时间、平均发作频率和止痛药使用方面,与安慰剂相比,褪黑素的反应率更好,但与阿米替林或丙戊酸盐相比,褪黑素没有显示出显著的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Melatonin as Prophylaxis for Migraine in Adults: A Meta-analysis.

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of melatonin for migraine prophylaxis in adults.

Methods: After a comprehensive literature search in the MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, and International Clinical Trial Registry Platform databases, reviewers extracted data from three relevant articles. PRISMA guidelines were followed in the selection, analysis, and reporting of the findings. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. A random-effects model was used to estimate the effect size, and meta-regression was performed for variables with a likely influence on effect size. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the comparison used in the included studies.

Results: Melatonin therapy in migraine was associated with a significantly higher responder rate when compared to both placebo and standard therapy (OR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.08 to 3.14; P = .03). The results of the meta-analyses indicated that melatonin can achieve a significant reduction in frequency of migraine attacks (MD = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.02 to 1.98; P = .04), migraine attack duration (MD = 5.02; 95% CI: 0. 91 to 9.13; P = .02), use of analgesics (MD = 1.43; 95% CI: 0.38 to 2.48; P = .008), and migraine severity (MD = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.63; P < .0001) over placebo, but had no significant effects in comparison to amitriptyline or valproate. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of common adverse drug reactions, such as drowsiness and fatigue, between the melatonin group and the comparison groups.

Conclusions: Melatonin showed a beneficial prophylactic role in migraine, with a better responder rate in comparison to placebo in reducing migraine severity, mean attack duration, mean attack frequency, and analgesic use, but did not show significant effects in comparison to amitriptyline or valproate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Founded upon sound scientific principles, this journal continues to make important contributions that strongly influence the work of dental and medical professionals involved in treating oral and facial pain, including temporomandibular disorders, and headache. In addition to providing timely scientific research and clinical articles, the journal presents diagnostic techniques and treatment therapies for oral and facial pain, headache, mandibular dysfunction, and occlusion and covers pharmacology, physical therapy, surgery, and other pain-management methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信