使用搏动式辅助心室装置的儿童的预后:先天性与后天性心脏病

IF 1.1 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mark S Bleiweis, Joseph Philip, Yuriy Stukov, Giles J Peek, Gregory M Janelle, Andrew D Pitkin, Kevin J Sullivan, James C Fudge, Himesh V Vyas, Jose F Hernandez-Rivera, Dan Neal, Omar M Sharaf, Jeffrey P Jacobs
{"title":"使用搏动式辅助心室装置的儿童的预后:先天性与后天性心脏病","authors":"Mark S Bleiweis, Joseph Philip, Yuriy Stukov, Giles J Peek, Gregory M Janelle, Andrew D Pitkin, Kevin J Sullivan, James C Fudge, Himesh V Vyas, Jose F Hernandez-Rivera, Dan Neal, Omar M Sharaf, Jeffrey P Jacobs","doi":"10.1177/21501351231181105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We reviewed the outcomes of 82 consecutive pediatric patients (less than 18 years of age) supported with the Berlin Heart ventricular assist device (VAD), comparing those with congenital heart disease (CHD; n  =  44) with those with acquired heart disease (AHD; n  =  37).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome was mortality after VAD insertion. Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests were used to assess group differences in long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four CHD patients were supported (age: median  =  65 days, range  =  4 days-13.3 years; weight [kg]: median  =  4, range  =  2.4-42.3). Ten biventricular CHD patients were supported with eight biventricular assist devices (BiVADs), one left ventricular assist device (LVAD) only, and one LVAD converted to BiVAD, while 34 univentricular CHD patients were supported with single ventricle-ventricular assist devices (sVADs). In CHD patients, duration of VAD support was [days]: median  =  134, range  =  4-554. Of 44 CHD patients, 28 underwent heart transplantation, 15 died on VAD, and one was still on VAD. Thirty-seven AHD patients were supported (age: median  =  1.9 years, range  =  27 days-17.7 years; weight [kg]: median  =  11, range  =  3.1-112), including 34 BiVAD and 3 LVAD. In AHD patients, duration of VAD support was [days]: median  =  97, range  =  4-315. Of 37 AHD patients, 28 underwent transplantation, three died on VAD, five weaned off VAD (one of whom underwent heart transplantation 334 days after weaning), and one was still on VAD. One-year survival after VAD insertion was 59.9% (95% CI  =  46.7%-76.7%) in CHD and 88.6% (95% CI  =  78.8%-99.8%) in AHD, <i>P</i>  =  .0004. Five-year survival after VAD insertion was 55.4% (95% CI  =  40.8%-75.2%) in CHD and 85.3% (95% CI  =  74.0%-98.2%) in AHD, <i>P</i>  =  .002.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pulsatile VAD facilitates bridge-to-transplantation in neonates, infants, and children with CHD; however, survival after VAD insertion is worse in patients with CHD than in patients with AHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":23974,"journal":{"name":"World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Children Supported With Pulsatile Paracorporeal Ventricular Assist Device: Congenital Versus Acquired Heart Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Mark S Bleiweis, Joseph Philip, Yuriy Stukov, Giles J Peek, Gregory M Janelle, Andrew D Pitkin, Kevin J Sullivan, James C Fudge, Himesh V Vyas, Jose F Hernandez-Rivera, Dan Neal, Omar M Sharaf, Jeffrey P Jacobs\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21501351231181105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We reviewed the outcomes of 82 consecutive pediatric patients (less than 18 years of age) supported with the Berlin Heart ventricular assist device (VAD), comparing those with congenital heart disease (CHD; n  =  44) with those with acquired heart disease (AHD; n  =  37).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome was mortality after VAD insertion. Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests were used to assess group differences in long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four CHD patients were supported (age: median  =  65 days, range  =  4 days-13.3 years; weight [kg]: median  =  4, range  =  2.4-42.3). Ten biventricular CHD patients were supported with eight biventricular assist devices (BiVADs), one left ventricular assist device (LVAD) only, and one LVAD converted to BiVAD, while 34 univentricular CHD patients were supported with single ventricle-ventricular assist devices (sVADs). In CHD patients, duration of VAD support was [days]: median  =  134, range  =  4-554. Of 44 CHD patients, 28 underwent heart transplantation, 15 died on VAD, and one was still on VAD. Thirty-seven AHD patients were supported (age: median  =  1.9 years, range  =  27 days-17.7 years; weight [kg]: median  =  11, range  =  3.1-112), including 34 BiVAD and 3 LVAD. In AHD patients, duration of VAD support was [days]: median  =  97, range  =  4-315. Of 37 AHD patients, 28 underwent transplantation, three died on VAD, five weaned off VAD (one of whom underwent heart transplantation 334 days after weaning), and one was still on VAD. One-year survival after VAD insertion was 59.9% (95% CI  =  46.7%-76.7%) in CHD and 88.6% (95% CI  =  78.8%-99.8%) in AHD, <i>P</i>  =  .0004. Five-year survival after VAD insertion was 55.4% (95% CI  =  40.8%-75.2%) in CHD and 85.3% (95% CI  =  74.0%-98.2%) in AHD, <i>P</i>  =  .002.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pulsatile VAD facilitates bridge-to-transplantation in neonates, infants, and children with CHD; however, survival after VAD insertion is worse in patients with CHD than in patients with AHD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501351231181105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501351231181105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们回顾了82名连续接受柏林心室辅助装置(VAD)支持的儿童患者(年龄小于18岁)的结果,比较了那些患有先天性心脏病(CHD  =  44)与患有获得性心脏病(AHD;n  =  方法:主要结果是VAD植入后的死亡率。Kaplan-Meier方法和对数秩检验用于评估长期生存率的组间差异。结果:支持了44名CHD患者(年龄:中位数  =  65天,范围  =  4天-13.3年;重量[kg]:中位数  =  4、量程  =  2.4-42.3)。10名双心室CHD患者接受了8个双心室辅助装置(BiVAD)、1个仅左心室辅助设备(LVAD)和1个转换为BiVAD的LVAD的支持,而34名单心室CHD病人接受了单心室辅助设备的支持。在CHD患者中,VAD支持的持续时间为[天]:中位数  =  134,范围  =  在44例CHD患者中,28例接受了心脏移植,15例死于VAD,1例仍在VAD。支持了37名AHD患者(年龄:中位数  =  1.9年,范围  =  27天-17.7年;重量[kg]:中位数  =  11,范围  =  3.1-112),包括34个BiVAD和3个LVAD。在AHD患者中,VAD支持的持续时间为[天]:中位数  =  97,范围  =  4-315.在37名AHD患者中,28人接受了移植,3人死于VAD,5人断奶(其中1人在断奶334天后接受了心脏移植),1人仍在接受VAD。VAD植入后的一年生存率为59.9%(95%CI  =  46.7%-76.7%)和88.6%(95%CI  =  78.8%-99.8%),P  =  .0004.插入VAD后的5年生存率为55.4%(95%置信区间  =  40.8%-75.2%)和85.3%(95%CI  =  74.0%-98.2%),P  =  .002.结论:脉动VAD有助于新生儿、婴儿和CHD儿童移植的桥接;然而,CHD患者植入VAD后的生存率比AHD患者差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Children Supported With Pulsatile Paracorporeal Ventricular Assist Device: Congenital Versus Acquired Heart Disease.

Background: We reviewed the outcomes of 82 consecutive pediatric patients (less than 18 years of age) supported with the Berlin Heart ventricular assist device (VAD), comparing those with congenital heart disease (CHD; n  =  44) with those with acquired heart disease (AHD; n  =  37).

Methods: The primary outcome was mortality after VAD insertion. Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests were used to assess group differences in long-term survival.

Results: Forty-four CHD patients were supported (age: median  =  65 days, range  =  4 days-13.3 years; weight [kg]: median  =  4, range  =  2.4-42.3). Ten biventricular CHD patients were supported with eight biventricular assist devices (BiVADs), one left ventricular assist device (LVAD) only, and one LVAD converted to BiVAD, while 34 univentricular CHD patients were supported with single ventricle-ventricular assist devices (sVADs). In CHD patients, duration of VAD support was [days]: median  =  134, range  =  4-554. Of 44 CHD patients, 28 underwent heart transplantation, 15 died on VAD, and one was still on VAD. Thirty-seven AHD patients were supported (age: median  =  1.9 years, range  =  27 days-17.7 years; weight [kg]: median  =  11, range  =  3.1-112), including 34 BiVAD and 3 LVAD. In AHD patients, duration of VAD support was [days]: median  =  97, range  =  4-315. Of 37 AHD patients, 28 underwent transplantation, three died on VAD, five weaned off VAD (one of whom underwent heart transplantation 334 days after weaning), and one was still on VAD. One-year survival after VAD insertion was 59.9% (95% CI  =  46.7%-76.7%) in CHD and 88.6% (95% CI  =  78.8%-99.8%) in AHD, P  =  .0004. Five-year survival after VAD insertion was 55.4% (95% CI  =  40.8%-75.2%) in CHD and 85.3% (95% CI  =  74.0%-98.2%) in AHD, P  =  .002.

Conclusions: Pulsatile VAD facilitates bridge-to-transplantation in neonates, infants, and children with CHD; however, survival after VAD insertion is worse in patients with CHD than in patients with AHD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信