Alison J Pinczel, Charmaine M Woods, Peter G Catcheside, Richard J Woodman, Andrew Simon Carney, Ching Li Chai-Coetzer, Michael Chia, Peter A Cistulli, John-Charles Hodge, Andrew Jones, Matthew E Lam, Richard Lewis, Nigel McArdle, Eng H Ooi, Siobhan Clare Rea, Guy Rees, Bhajan Singh, Nicholas Stow, Aeneas Yeo, Nick Antic, Ronald Doug McEvoy, Edward M Weaver, Stuart G MacKay
{"title":"睡眠呼吸暂停多层次手术(SAMS)试验:长期观察结果。","authors":"Alison J Pinczel, Charmaine M Woods, Peter G Catcheside, Richard J Woodman, Andrew Simon Carney, Ching Li Chai-Coetzer, Michael Chia, Peter A Cistulli, John-Charles Hodge, Andrew Jones, Matthew E Lam, Richard Lewis, Nigel McArdle, Eng H Ooi, Siobhan Clare Rea, Guy Rees, Bhajan Singh, Nicholas Stow, Aeneas Yeo, Nick Antic, Ronald Doug McEvoy, Edward M Weaver, Stuart G MacKay","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsad218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>The sleep apnea multi-level surgery (SAMS) randomized clinical trial showed surgery improved outcomes at 6 months compared to ongoing medical management in patients with moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who failed continuous positive airway pressure therapy. This study reports the long-term outcomes of the multi-level surgery as a case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surgical participants were reassessed >2 years postoperatively with the same outcomes reported in the main SAMS trial. Primary outcomes were apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), with secondary outcomes including other polysomnography measures, symptoms, quality of life, and adverse events. Long-term effectiveness (baseline to long-term follow-up [LTFU]) and interval changes (6 month to LTFU) were assessed using mixed effects regression models. Control participants were also reassessed for rate of subsequent surgery and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>36/48 (75%) of surgical participants were reevaluated (mean (standard deviation)) 3.5 (1.0) years following surgery, with 29 undergoing polysomnography. AHI was 41/h (23) at preoperative baseline and 21/h (18) at follow-up, representing persistent improvement of -24/h (95% CI -32, -17; p < 0.001). ESS was 12.3 (3.5) at baseline and 5.5 (3.9) at follow-up, representing persistent improvement of -6.8 (95% CI -8.3, -5.4; p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes were improved long term, and adverse events were minor. Interval change analysis suggests stability of outcomes. 36/43 (84%) of the control participants were reevaluated, with 25 (69%) reporting subsequent surgery, with symptom and quality of life improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multi-level upper airway surgery improves OSA burden with long-term maintenance of treatment effect in adults with moderate or severe OSA in whom conventional therapy failed.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial: </strong>Multi-level airway surgery in patients with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who have failed medical management to assess change in OSA events and daytime sleepiness; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=366019&isReview=true; ACTRN12614000338662.</p>","PeriodicalId":49514,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sleep apnea multi-level surgery trial: long-term observational outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Alison J Pinczel, Charmaine M Woods, Peter G Catcheside, Richard J Woodman, Andrew Simon Carney, Ching Li Chai-Coetzer, Michael Chia, Peter A Cistulli, John-Charles Hodge, Andrew Jones, Matthew E Lam, Richard Lewis, Nigel McArdle, Eng H Ooi, Siobhan Clare Rea, Guy Rees, Bhajan Singh, Nicholas Stow, Aeneas Yeo, Nick Antic, Ronald Doug McEvoy, Edward M Weaver, Stuart G MacKay\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sleep/zsad218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>The sleep apnea multi-level surgery (SAMS) randomized clinical trial showed surgery improved outcomes at 6 months compared to ongoing medical management in patients with moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who failed continuous positive airway pressure therapy. This study reports the long-term outcomes of the multi-level surgery as a case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surgical participants were reassessed >2 years postoperatively with the same outcomes reported in the main SAMS trial. Primary outcomes were apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), with secondary outcomes including other polysomnography measures, symptoms, quality of life, and adverse events. Long-term effectiveness (baseline to long-term follow-up [LTFU]) and interval changes (6 month to LTFU) were assessed using mixed effects regression models. Control participants were also reassessed for rate of subsequent surgery and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>36/48 (75%) of surgical participants were reevaluated (mean (standard deviation)) 3.5 (1.0) years following surgery, with 29 undergoing polysomnography. AHI was 41/h (23) at preoperative baseline and 21/h (18) at follow-up, representing persistent improvement of -24/h (95% CI -32, -17; p < 0.001). ESS was 12.3 (3.5) at baseline and 5.5 (3.9) at follow-up, representing persistent improvement of -6.8 (95% CI -8.3, -5.4; p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes were improved long term, and adverse events were minor. Interval change analysis suggests stability of outcomes. 36/43 (84%) of the control participants were reevaluated, with 25 (69%) reporting subsequent surgery, with symptom and quality of life improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multi-level upper airway surgery improves OSA burden with long-term maintenance of treatment effect in adults with moderate or severe OSA in whom conventional therapy failed.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial: </strong>Multi-level airway surgery in patients with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who have failed medical management to assess change in OSA events and daytime sleepiness; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=366019&isReview=true; ACTRN12614000338662.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsad218\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsad218","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的:睡眠呼吸暂停分级手术(SAMS)随机临床试验显示,与持续气道正压治疗失败的中度或重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者相比,手术在6个月时改善了预后。本研究报告了多层次手术的长期结果。方法:手术参与者在术后20年进行重新评估,与主要SAMS试验报告的结果相同。主要结局是呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)和Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS),次要结局包括其他多导睡眠图测量、症状、生活质量和不良事件。使用混合效应回归模型评估长期疗效(基线至长期随访)和间隔变化(6个月至长期随访)。对照组也重新评估了后续手术的发生率和结果。结果:36/48(75%)的手术参与者在手术后3.5[1.0]年重新评估(mean [SD]),其中29人接受了多导睡眠图检查。术前基线AHI为41/h[23],随访时为21/h[23],持续改善-24/h [95% CI -32, -17;结论:在常规治疗失败的成人中重度OSA患者中,多级上气道手术可改善OSA负担并长期维持治疗效果。
Sleep apnea multi-level surgery trial: long-term observational outcomes.
Study objectives: The sleep apnea multi-level surgery (SAMS) randomized clinical trial showed surgery improved outcomes at 6 months compared to ongoing medical management in patients with moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who failed continuous positive airway pressure therapy. This study reports the long-term outcomes of the multi-level surgery as a case series.
Methods: Surgical participants were reassessed >2 years postoperatively with the same outcomes reported in the main SAMS trial. Primary outcomes were apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), with secondary outcomes including other polysomnography measures, symptoms, quality of life, and adverse events. Long-term effectiveness (baseline to long-term follow-up [LTFU]) and interval changes (6 month to LTFU) were assessed using mixed effects regression models. Control participants were also reassessed for rate of subsequent surgery and outcomes.
Results: 36/48 (75%) of surgical participants were reevaluated (mean (standard deviation)) 3.5 (1.0) years following surgery, with 29 undergoing polysomnography. AHI was 41/h (23) at preoperative baseline and 21/h (18) at follow-up, representing persistent improvement of -24/h (95% CI -32, -17; p < 0.001). ESS was 12.3 (3.5) at baseline and 5.5 (3.9) at follow-up, representing persistent improvement of -6.8 (95% CI -8.3, -5.4; p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes were improved long term, and adverse events were minor. Interval change analysis suggests stability of outcomes. 36/43 (84%) of the control participants were reevaluated, with 25 (69%) reporting subsequent surgery, with symptom and quality of life improvements.
Conclusion: Multi-level upper airway surgery improves OSA burden with long-term maintenance of treatment effect in adults with moderate or severe OSA in whom conventional therapy failed.
Clinical trial: Multi-level airway surgery in patients with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who have failed medical management to assess change in OSA events and daytime sleepiness; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=366019&isReview=true; ACTRN12614000338662.
期刊介绍:
SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including:
Genes
Molecules
Cells
Physiology
Neural systems and circuits
Behavior and cognition
Self-report
SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to:
Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms
In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders
Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms
Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease
Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.