一种cbpr增强型德尔菲法:伙伴关系成功的测量方法案例研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Education & Behavior Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-22 DOI:10.1177/10901981221076400
Barbara L Brush, Shoou-Yih D Lee, Adena Gabrysiak, Megan Jensen, Eliza Wilson-Powers, Chris M Coombe, P Paul Chandanabhumma, Melissa Valerio, Barbara A Israel, Laurie Lachance
{"title":"一种cbpr增强型德尔菲法:伙伴关系成功的测量方法案例研究。","authors":"Barbara L Brush, Shoou-Yih D Lee, Adena Gabrysiak, Megan Jensen, Eliza Wilson-Powers, Chris M Coombe, P Paul Chandanabhumma, Melissa Valerio, Barbara A Israel, Laurie Lachance","doi":"10.1177/10901981221076400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As part of a 5-year study to develop and validate an instrument for measuring success in long-standing community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships, we utilized the Delphi method with a panel of 16 community and academic CBPR experts to assess face and content validity of the instrument's broad concepts of success and measurement items. In addition to incorporating quantitative and qualitative feedback from two online surveys, we included a 2-day face-to-face meeting with the Expert Panel to invite open discussion and diversity of opinion in line with the CBPR principles framing and guiding the study. The face-to-face meeting allowed experts to review the survey data (with maintained anonymity), convey their perspectives, and offer interpretations that were untapped in the online surveys. Using a CBPR approach facilitated a synergistic process that moved above and beyond the consensus achieved in the initial Delphi rounds, to enhance the Delphi technique and the development of items in the instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":12974,"journal":{"name":"Health Education & Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"212-217"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040148/pdf/nihms-1873277.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A CBPR-Enhanced Delphi Method: The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success Case Study.\",\"authors\":\"Barbara L Brush, Shoou-Yih D Lee, Adena Gabrysiak, Megan Jensen, Eliza Wilson-Powers, Chris M Coombe, P Paul Chandanabhumma, Melissa Valerio, Barbara A Israel, Laurie Lachance\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10901981221076400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As part of a 5-year study to develop and validate an instrument for measuring success in long-standing community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships, we utilized the Delphi method with a panel of 16 community and academic CBPR experts to assess face and content validity of the instrument's broad concepts of success and measurement items. In addition to incorporating quantitative and qualitative feedback from two online surveys, we included a 2-day face-to-face meeting with the Expert Panel to invite open discussion and diversity of opinion in line with the CBPR principles framing and guiding the study. The face-to-face meeting allowed experts to review the survey data (with maintained anonymity), convey their perspectives, and offer interpretations that were untapped in the online surveys. Using a CBPR approach facilitated a synergistic process that moved above and beyond the consensus achieved in the initial Delphi rounds, to enhance the Delphi technique and the development of items in the instrument.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Education & Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"212-217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040148/pdf/nihms-1873277.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Education & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981221076400\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981221076400","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为一项为期5年的研究的一部分,我们开发和验证了一个衡量长期社区参与性研究(CBPR)伙伴关系成功的工具,我们利用德尔菲法与16个社区和学术CBPR专家小组来评估该工具广泛的成功概念和测量项目的表面和内容效度。除了纳入两项在线调查的定量和定性反馈外,我们还与专家小组举行了为期两天的面对面会议,邀请专家小组根据构建和指导研究的CBPR原则进行公开讨论和多样化意见。面对面的会议允许专家审查调查数据(保持匿名),传达他们的观点,并提供在线调查中未开发的解释。采用CBPR方法促进了一个协同过程,超越了最初德尔菲回合达成的共识,以加强德尔菲技术和工具项目的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A CBPR-Enhanced Delphi Method: The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success Case Study.

A CBPR-Enhanced Delphi Method: The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success Case Study.

As part of a 5-year study to develop and validate an instrument for measuring success in long-standing community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships, we utilized the Delphi method with a panel of 16 community and academic CBPR experts to assess face and content validity of the instrument's broad concepts of success and measurement items. In addition to incorporating quantitative and qualitative feedback from two online surveys, we included a 2-day face-to-face meeting with the Expert Panel to invite open discussion and diversity of opinion in line with the CBPR principles framing and guiding the study. The face-to-face meeting allowed experts to review the survey data (with maintained anonymity), convey their perspectives, and offer interpretations that were untapped in the online surveys. Using a CBPR approach facilitated a synergistic process that moved above and beyond the consensus achieved in the initial Delphi rounds, to enhance the Delphi technique and the development of items in the instrument.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Education & Behavior
Health Education & Behavior PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Health Education & Behavior is the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education (SOPHE). The journal publishes authoritative and practical information on critical health issues for a broad range of professionals interested in understanding factors associated with health behavior and health status, and strategies to improve social and behavioral health. The journal is interested in articles directed toward researchers and/or practitioners in health behavior and health education. Empirical research, case study, program evaluation, literature reviews, and articles discussing theories are regularly published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信