感染性休克患者中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳差、动脉-中心静脉氧差、乳酸清除率与预后的相关性:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。

Q3 Medicine
Kavya Sindhu, Deepak Malviya, Samiksha Parashar, Chandrakant Pandey, Soumya Sankar Nath, Shilpi Misra
{"title":"感染性休克患者中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳差、动脉-中心静脉氧差、乳酸清除率与预后的相关性:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。","authors":"Kavya Sindhu,&nbsp;Deepak Malviya,&nbsp;Samiksha Parashar,&nbsp;Chandrakant Pandey,&nbsp;Soumya Sankar Nath,&nbsp;Shilpi Misra","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_10_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess the relationship between the ratio of difference of venoarterial CO<sub>2</sub> tension (P (v-a) CO<sub>2</sub>) and difference of arterio-venous oxygen content (C (a-cv) O<sub>2</sub>), i.e., ΔPCO<sub>2</sub>/ΔCaO<sub>2</sub> with lactate clearance (LC) at 8 and 24 h, to define a cutoff for the ratio to identify LC >10% and >20% at 8 and 24 h, respectively, and its association with prognosis in septic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with septic shock were included in this prospective, observational cohort study. Blood samples for arterial lactate, arterial, and central venous oxygen and carbon dioxide were drawn simultaneously at time zero (T0), 8 h (T8), and 24 h (T24). At T8, patients were divided into Group 8A (LC ≥10%) and Group 8B (LC <10%). At T24, patients were divided into Group 24A (LC ≥20%) and Group 24B (LC <20%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninty-eight patients were included. The area under the curve of ΔPCO<sub>2</sub>/ΔCaO<sub>2</sub> at T8 (0.596) and T24 (0.823) was the highest when compared to P(v-a) CO<sub>2</sub> and C(a-v) O<sub>2</sub>. The best cutoff of P(v-a) CO<sub>2</sub>/C (a-v) O<sub>2</sub> as predictor of LC >10% was 1.31 (sensitivity 70.6% and specificity 53.3%) and for LC >20% was 1.37 (sensitivity 100% and specificity 50%). At both T8 and T24, P(v-a) CO<sub>2</sub>/C (a-v) O<sub>2</sub> showed a significant negative correlation with LC. Groups 8A and 24A showed lower intensive care unit mortality than 8B and 24B, respectively. Values of P(v-a) CO<sub>2</sub>/C (a-v) O<sub>2</sub> at T8 were comparable, but at T24, there was a significant difference between the survivors and nonsurvivors (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ΔPCO<sub>2</sub>/ΔCaO<sub>2</sub> predicts lactate clearance, and its 24 h value appears superior to the 8-h value in predicting LC and mortality in septic shock patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"12 3","pages":"146-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9728068/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference to arterial-central venous oxygen difference ratio to lactate clearance and prognosis in patients with septic shock: A prospective observational cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Kavya Sindhu,&nbsp;Deepak Malviya,&nbsp;Samiksha Parashar,&nbsp;Chandrakant Pandey,&nbsp;Soumya Sankar Nath,&nbsp;Shilpi Misra\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_10_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess the relationship between the ratio of difference of venoarterial CO<sub>2</sub> tension (P (v-a) CO<sub>2</sub>) and difference of arterio-venous oxygen content (C (a-cv) O<sub>2</sub>), i.e., ΔPCO<sub>2</sub>/ΔCaO<sub>2</sub> with lactate clearance (LC) at 8 and 24 h, to define a cutoff for the ratio to identify LC >10% and >20% at 8 and 24 h, respectively, and its association with prognosis in septic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with septic shock were included in this prospective, observational cohort study. Blood samples for arterial lactate, arterial, and central venous oxygen and carbon dioxide were drawn simultaneously at time zero (T0), 8 h (T8), and 24 h (T24). At T8, patients were divided into Group 8A (LC ≥10%) and Group 8B (LC <10%). At T24, patients were divided into Group 24A (LC ≥20%) and Group 24B (LC <20%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninty-eight patients were included. The area under the curve of ΔPCO<sub>2</sub>/ΔCaO<sub>2</sub> at T8 (0.596) and T24 (0.823) was the highest when compared to P(v-a) CO<sub>2</sub> and C(a-v) O<sub>2</sub>. The best cutoff of P(v-a) CO<sub>2</sub>/C (a-v) O<sub>2</sub> as predictor of LC >10% was 1.31 (sensitivity 70.6% and specificity 53.3%) and for LC >20% was 1.37 (sensitivity 100% and specificity 50%). At both T8 and T24, P(v-a) CO<sub>2</sub>/C (a-v) O<sub>2</sub> showed a significant negative correlation with LC. Groups 8A and 24A showed lower intensive care unit mortality than 8B and 24B, respectively. Values of P(v-a) CO<sub>2</sub>/C (a-v) O<sub>2</sub> at T8 were comparable, but at T24, there was a significant difference between the survivors and nonsurvivors (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ΔPCO<sub>2</sub>/ΔCaO<sub>2</sub> predicts lactate clearance, and its 24 h value appears superior to the 8-h value in predicting LC and mortality in septic shock patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"146-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9728068/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_10_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_10_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:评估8和24 h静脉CO2张力差值(P (v-a) CO2)与动静脉氧含量差值(C (a-cv) O2)即ΔPCO2/ΔCaO2与乳酸清除率(LC)的关系,确定8和24 h乳酸清除率>10%和>20%比值的临界值及其与感染性休克预后的关系。方法:这项前瞻性、观察性队列研究纳入了感染性休克的成年患者。在0 (T0)、8 (T8)和24 (T24)同时抽取血中动脉乳酸、动脉和中心静脉氧和二氧化碳。T8时将患者分为8A组(LC≥10%)和8B组(LC)。结果:纳入98例患者。与P(v-a) CO2和C(a-v) O2相比,T8(0.596)和T24(0.823)时ΔPCO2/ΔCaO2曲线下面积最大。P(v-a) CO2/C (a-v) O2作为LC >10%预测因子的最佳截止值为1.31(敏感性70.6%,特异性53.3%),LC >20%的最佳截止值为1.37(敏感性100%,特异性50%)。在T8和T24时,P(v-a) CO2/C (a-v) O2与LC呈显著负相关。8A组和24A组重症监护病房死亡率分别低于8B组和24B组。T8时的P(v-a) CO2/C (a-v) O2值具有可比性,但在T24时,存活者与非存活者之间存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。结论:ΔPCO2/ΔCaO2可预测感染性休克患者的乳酸清除率,其24 h值在预测LC和死亡率方面优于8 h值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Correlation of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference to arterial-central venous oxygen difference ratio to lactate clearance and prognosis in patients with septic shock: A prospective observational cohort study.

Correlation of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference to arterial-central venous oxygen difference ratio to lactate clearance and prognosis in patients with septic shock: A prospective observational cohort study.

Correlation of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference to arterial-central venous oxygen difference ratio to lactate clearance and prognosis in patients with septic shock: A prospective observational cohort study.

Correlation of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference to arterial-central venous oxygen difference ratio to lactate clearance and prognosis in patients with septic shock: A prospective observational cohort study.

Background: To assess the relationship between the ratio of difference of venoarterial CO2 tension (P (v-a) CO2) and difference of arterio-venous oxygen content (C (a-cv) O2), i.e., ΔPCO2/ΔCaO2 with lactate clearance (LC) at 8 and 24 h, to define a cutoff for the ratio to identify LC >10% and >20% at 8 and 24 h, respectively, and its association with prognosis in septic shock.

Methods: Adult patients with septic shock were included in this prospective, observational cohort study. Blood samples for arterial lactate, arterial, and central venous oxygen and carbon dioxide were drawn simultaneously at time zero (T0), 8 h (T8), and 24 h (T24). At T8, patients were divided into Group 8A (LC ≥10%) and Group 8B (LC <10%). At T24, patients were divided into Group 24A (LC ≥20%) and Group 24B (LC <20%).

Results: Ninty-eight patients were included. The area under the curve of ΔPCO2/ΔCaO2 at T8 (0.596) and T24 (0.823) was the highest when compared to P(v-a) CO2 and C(a-v) O2. The best cutoff of P(v-a) CO2/C (a-v) O2 as predictor of LC >10% was 1.31 (sensitivity 70.6% and specificity 53.3%) and for LC >20% was 1.37 (sensitivity 100% and specificity 50%). At both T8 and T24, P(v-a) CO2/C (a-v) O2 showed a significant negative correlation with LC. Groups 8A and 24A showed lower intensive care unit mortality than 8B and 24B, respectively. Values of P(v-a) CO2/C (a-v) O2 at T8 were comparable, but at T24, there was a significant difference between the survivors and nonsurvivors (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: ΔPCO2/ΔCaO2 predicts lactate clearance, and its 24 h value appears superior to the 8-h value in predicting LC and mortality in septic shock patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信