{"title":"感染性休克患者中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳差、动脉-中心静脉氧差、乳酸清除率与预后的相关性:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。","authors":"Kavya Sindhu, Deepak Malviya, Samiksha Parashar, Chandrakant Pandey, Soumya Sankar Nath, Shilpi Misra","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_10_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess the relationship between the ratio of difference of venoarterial CO<sub>2</sub> tension (P (v-a) CO<sub>2</sub>) and difference of arterio-venous oxygen content (C (a-cv) O<sub>2</sub>), i.e., ΔPCO<sub>2</sub>/ΔCaO<sub>2</sub> with lactate clearance (LC) at 8 and 24 h, to define a cutoff for the ratio to identify LC >10% and >20% at 8 and 24 h, respectively, and its association with prognosis in septic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with septic shock were included in this prospective, observational cohort study. Blood samples for arterial lactate, arterial, and central venous oxygen and carbon dioxide were drawn simultaneously at time zero (T0), 8 h (T8), and 24 h (T24). At T8, patients were divided into Group 8A (LC ≥10%) and Group 8B (LC <10%). At T24, patients were divided into Group 24A (LC ≥20%) and Group 24B (LC <20%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninty-eight patients were included. The area under the curve of ΔPCO<sub>2</sub>/ΔCaO<sub>2</sub> at T8 (0.596) and T24 (0.823) was the highest when compared to P(v-a) CO<sub>2</sub> and C(a-v) O<sub>2</sub>. The best cutoff of P(v-a) CO<sub>2</sub>/C (a-v) O<sub>2</sub> as predictor of LC >10% was 1.31 (sensitivity 70.6% and specificity 53.3%) and for LC >20% was 1.37 (sensitivity 100% and specificity 50%). At both T8 and T24, P(v-a) CO<sub>2</sub>/C (a-v) O<sub>2</sub> showed a significant negative correlation with LC. Groups 8A and 24A showed lower intensive care unit mortality than 8B and 24B, respectively. Values of P(v-a) CO<sub>2</sub>/C (a-v) O<sub>2</sub> at T8 were comparable, but at T24, there was a significant difference between the survivors and nonsurvivors (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ΔPCO<sub>2</sub>/ΔCaO<sub>2</sub> predicts lactate clearance, and its 24 h value appears superior to the 8-h value in predicting LC and mortality in septic shock patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"12 3","pages":"146-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9728068/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference to arterial-central venous oxygen difference ratio to lactate clearance and prognosis in patients with septic shock: A prospective observational cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Kavya Sindhu, Deepak Malviya, Samiksha Parashar, Chandrakant Pandey, Soumya Sankar Nath, Shilpi Misra\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_10_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess the relationship between the ratio of difference of venoarterial CO<sub>2</sub> tension (P (v-a) CO<sub>2</sub>) and difference of arterio-venous oxygen content (C (a-cv) O<sub>2</sub>), i.e., ΔPCO<sub>2</sub>/ΔCaO<sub>2</sub> with lactate clearance (LC) at 8 and 24 h, to define a cutoff for the ratio to identify LC >10% and >20% at 8 and 24 h, respectively, and its association with prognosis in septic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with septic shock were included in this prospective, observational cohort study. Blood samples for arterial lactate, arterial, and central venous oxygen and carbon dioxide were drawn simultaneously at time zero (T0), 8 h (T8), and 24 h (T24). At T8, patients were divided into Group 8A (LC ≥10%) and Group 8B (LC <10%). At T24, patients were divided into Group 24A (LC ≥20%) and Group 24B (LC <20%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninty-eight patients were included. The area under the curve of ΔPCO<sub>2</sub>/ΔCaO<sub>2</sub> at T8 (0.596) and T24 (0.823) was the highest when compared to P(v-a) CO<sub>2</sub> and C(a-v) O<sub>2</sub>. The best cutoff of P(v-a) CO<sub>2</sub>/C (a-v) O<sub>2</sub> as predictor of LC >10% was 1.31 (sensitivity 70.6% and specificity 53.3%) and for LC >20% was 1.37 (sensitivity 100% and specificity 50%). At both T8 and T24, P(v-a) CO<sub>2</sub>/C (a-v) O<sub>2</sub> showed a significant negative correlation with LC. Groups 8A and 24A showed lower intensive care unit mortality than 8B and 24B, respectively. Values of P(v-a) CO<sub>2</sub>/C (a-v) O<sub>2</sub> at T8 were comparable, but at T24, there was a significant difference between the survivors and nonsurvivors (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ΔPCO<sub>2</sub>/ΔCaO<sub>2</sub> predicts lactate clearance, and its 24 h value appears superior to the 8-h value in predicting LC and mortality in septic shock patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"146-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9728068/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_10_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_10_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Correlation of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference to arterial-central venous oxygen difference ratio to lactate clearance and prognosis in patients with septic shock: A prospective observational cohort study.
Background: To assess the relationship between the ratio of difference of venoarterial CO2 tension (P (v-a) CO2) and difference of arterio-venous oxygen content (C (a-cv) O2), i.e., ΔPCO2/ΔCaO2 with lactate clearance (LC) at 8 and 24 h, to define a cutoff for the ratio to identify LC >10% and >20% at 8 and 24 h, respectively, and its association with prognosis in septic shock.
Methods: Adult patients with septic shock were included in this prospective, observational cohort study. Blood samples for arterial lactate, arterial, and central venous oxygen and carbon dioxide were drawn simultaneously at time zero (T0), 8 h (T8), and 24 h (T24). At T8, patients were divided into Group 8A (LC ≥10%) and Group 8B (LC <10%). At T24, patients were divided into Group 24A (LC ≥20%) and Group 24B (LC <20%).
Results: Ninty-eight patients were included. The area under the curve of ΔPCO2/ΔCaO2 at T8 (0.596) and T24 (0.823) was the highest when compared to P(v-a) CO2 and C(a-v) O2. The best cutoff of P(v-a) CO2/C (a-v) O2 as predictor of LC >10% was 1.31 (sensitivity 70.6% and specificity 53.3%) and for LC >20% was 1.37 (sensitivity 100% and specificity 50%). At both T8 and T24, P(v-a) CO2/C (a-v) O2 showed a significant negative correlation with LC. Groups 8A and 24A showed lower intensive care unit mortality than 8B and 24B, respectively. Values of P(v-a) CO2/C (a-v) O2 at T8 were comparable, but at T24, there was a significant difference between the survivors and nonsurvivors (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: ΔPCO2/ΔCaO2 predicts lactate clearance, and its 24 h value appears superior to the 8-h value in predicting LC and mortality in septic shock patients.
期刊介绍:
IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.