前列腺动脉栓塞术目前的争议和争论综述。

IF 1 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Drew Maclean, Charles Timothy Francis Bryant, Ganesh Vigneswaran, Timothy Jc Bryant, Mark Harris, Bhaskar Somani, Sachin Modi
{"title":"前列腺动脉栓塞术目前的争议和争论综述。","authors":"Drew Maclean,&nbsp;Charles Timothy Francis Bryant,&nbsp;Ganesh Vigneswaran,&nbsp;Timothy Jc Bryant,&nbsp;Mark Harris,&nbsp;Bhaskar Somani,&nbsp;Sachin Modi","doi":"10.5152/tud.2022.21337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate artery embolization is emerging as one of the most effective therapies amidst a new era of mini- mally invasive benign prostate hyperplasia treatment and technology. However, several current controver- sies remain unanswered which could impact the widespread adoption of this novel and unique transarterial(rather than transurethral) intervention. This is reflected in the differences between the UK (NICE), European (EAU), and American (AUA) guidelines, the latter of which only recommends the use of prostate arteryembolization in a clinical trial setting. The main issues include questions over the duration of symptom response, cost-effectiveness, mechanism of action, patient selection, and other procedural technical consid- erations. These factors are the most pressing faced by proponents of prostate artery embolization, and we seek to highlight why their resolution is important to ensure men with benign prostate hyperplasia seeking a minimally invasive solution are optimally informed and most effectively managed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23366,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730263/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive Review on Current Controversies and Debate in Prostate Artery Embolization.\",\"authors\":\"Drew Maclean,&nbsp;Charles Timothy Francis Bryant,&nbsp;Ganesh Vigneswaran,&nbsp;Timothy Jc Bryant,&nbsp;Mark Harris,&nbsp;Bhaskar Somani,&nbsp;Sachin Modi\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/tud.2022.21337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prostate artery embolization is emerging as one of the most effective therapies amidst a new era of mini- mally invasive benign prostate hyperplasia treatment and technology. However, several current controver- sies remain unanswered which could impact the widespread adoption of this novel and unique transarterial(rather than transurethral) intervention. This is reflected in the differences between the UK (NICE), European (EAU), and American (AUA) guidelines, the latter of which only recommends the use of prostate arteryembolization in a clinical trial setting. The main issues include questions over the duration of symptom response, cost-effectiveness, mechanism of action, patient selection, and other procedural technical consid- erations. These factors are the most pressing faced by proponents of prostate artery embolization, and we seek to highlight why their resolution is important to ensure men with benign prostate hyperplasia seeking a minimally invasive solution are optimally informed and most effectively managed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish journal of urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730263/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish journal of urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2022.21337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2022.21337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在微创前列腺增生治疗技术的新时代,前列腺动脉栓塞是最有效的治疗方法之一。然而,目前的一些争议仍未得到解决,这可能会影响这种新颖独特的经动脉(而不是经尿道)介入治疗的广泛采用。这反映在英国(NICE)、欧洲(EAU)和美国(AUA)指南之间的差异上,后者仅建议在临床试验环境中使用前列腺动脉栓塞。主要问题包括症状反应持续时间、成本效益、作用机制、患者选择和其他程序性技术考虑。这些因素是前列腺动脉栓塞支持者面临的最紧迫的问题,我们试图强调为什么解决这些问题对于确保寻求微创治疗的良性前列腺增生患者获得最佳信息和最有效的治疗是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comprehensive Review on Current Controversies and Debate in Prostate Artery Embolization.

Comprehensive Review on Current Controversies and Debate in Prostate Artery Embolization.

Comprehensive Review on Current Controversies and Debate in Prostate Artery Embolization.

Comprehensive Review on Current Controversies and Debate in Prostate Artery Embolization.

Prostate artery embolization is emerging as one of the most effective therapies amidst a new era of mini- mally invasive benign prostate hyperplasia treatment and technology. However, several current controver- sies remain unanswered which could impact the widespread adoption of this novel and unique transarterial(rather than transurethral) intervention. This is reflected in the differences between the UK (NICE), European (EAU), and American (AUA) guidelines, the latter of which only recommends the use of prostate arteryembolization in a clinical trial setting. The main issues include questions over the duration of symptom response, cost-effectiveness, mechanism of action, patient selection, and other procedural technical consid- erations. These factors are the most pressing faced by proponents of prostate artery embolization, and we seek to highlight why their resolution is important to ensure men with benign prostate hyperplasia seeking a minimally invasive solution are optimally informed and most effectively managed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish journal of urology
Turkish journal of urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The aim of the Turkish Journal of Urology is to contribute to the literature by publishing scientifically high-quality research articles as well as reviews, editorials, letters to the editor and case reports. The journal’s target audience includes, urology specialists, medical specialty fellows and other specialists and practitioners who are interested in the field of urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信