职业行为和价值侵蚀:医生和电子健康记录的定性研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Kelley M Skeff, Cati G Brown-Johnson, Steven M Asch, Dani L Zionts, Marcy Winget, Yaniv Kerem
{"title":"职业行为和价值侵蚀:医生和电子健康记录的定性研究。","authors":"Kelley M Skeff,&nbsp;Cati G Brown-Johnson,&nbsp;Steven M Asch,&nbsp;Dani L Zionts,&nbsp;Marcy Winget,&nbsp;Yaniv Kerem","doi":"10.1097/JHM-D-21-00070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>Occurrences of physician burnout have reached epidemic numbers, and the electronic health record (EHR) is a commonly cited cause of the distress. To enhance current understanding of the relationship between burnout and the EHR, we explored the connections between physicians' distress and the EHR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this qualitative study, physicians and graduate medical trainees from two healthcare organizations in California were interviewed about EHR-related distressing events and the impact on their emotions and actions. We analyzed physician responses to identify themes regarding the negative impact of the EHR on physician experience and actions. EHR \"distressing events\" were categorized using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Physician Professional Competencies.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Every participating physician reported EHR-related distress affecting professional activities. Five main themes emerged from our analysis: system blocks to patient care; poor implementation, design, and functionality of the EHR; billing priorities conflicting with ideal workflow and best-practice care; lack of efficiency; and poor teamwork function. When mapped to the ACGME competencies, physician distress frequently stemmed from situations where physicians prioritized systems-based practice above other desired professional actions and behaviors. Physicians also reported a climate of silence in which physicians would not share problems due to fear of retribution or lack of confidence that the problems would be addressed.</p><p><strong>Practical applications: </strong>Physicians and administrators need to address the hierarchy of values that prioritizes system requirements such as those required by the EHR above physicians' other desired professional actions and behaviors. Balancing the importance of competing competencies may help to address rising burnout. We also recommend that administrators consider qualitative anonymous interviews as an effective method to uncover and understand physician distress in light of physicians' reported climate of silence.</p>","PeriodicalId":51633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fa/d1/jhcma-67-339.PMC9447433.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professional Behavior and Value Erosion: A Qualitative Study of Physicians and the Electronic Health Record.\",\"authors\":\"Kelley M Skeff,&nbsp;Cati G Brown-Johnson,&nbsp;Steven M Asch,&nbsp;Dani L Zionts,&nbsp;Marcy Winget,&nbsp;Yaniv Kerem\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JHM-D-21-00070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>Occurrences of physician burnout have reached epidemic numbers, and the electronic health record (EHR) is a commonly cited cause of the distress. To enhance current understanding of the relationship between burnout and the EHR, we explored the connections between physicians' distress and the EHR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this qualitative study, physicians and graduate medical trainees from two healthcare organizations in California were interviewed about EHR-related distressing events and the impact on their emotions and actions. We analyzed physician responses to identify themes regarding the negative impact of the EHR on physician experience and actions. EHR \\\"distressing events\\\" were categorized using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Physician Professional Competencies.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Every participating physician reported EHR-related distress affecting professional activities. Five main themes emerged from our analysis: system blocks to patient care; poor implementation, design, and functionality of the EHR; billing priorities conflicting with ideal workflow and best-practice care; lack of efficiency; and poor teamwork function. When mapped to the ACGME competencies, physician distress frequently stemmed from situations where physicians prioritized systems-based practice above other desired professional actions and behaviors. Physicians also reported a climate of silence in which physicians would not share problems due to fear of retribution or lack of confidence that the problems would be addressed.</p><p><strong>Practical applications: </strong>Physicians and administrators need to address the hierarchy of values that prioritizes system requirements such as those required by the EHR above physicians' other desired professional actions and behaviors. Balancing the importance of competing competencies may help to address rising burnout. We also recommend that administrators consider qualitative anonymous interviews as an effective method to uncover and understand physician distress in light of physicians' reported climate of silence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Healthcare Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fa/d1/jhcma-67-339.PMC9447433.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Healthcare Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-21-00070\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-21-00070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目标:医生职业倦怠的发生率已经达到了流行病的数字,电子健康记录(EHR)是一个通常被引用的痛苦的原因。为了加强目前对职业倦怠和电子病历之间关系的理解,我们探讨了医生的痛苦和电子病历之间的联系。方法:在本质性研究中,对来自加州两家医疗机构的医生和研究生医学实习生进行访谈,了解与电子病历相关的痛苦事件及其对他们情绪和行为的影响。我们分析了医生的反应,以确定关于电子病历对医生经验和行为的负面影响的主题。EHR“令人痛苦的事件”使用研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)医师专业能力进行分类。主要发现:每位参与调查的医生都报告了与电子病历相关的困扰,影响了专业活动。我们的分析得出了五个主要主题:系统对患者护理的阻碍;电子病历的实施、设计和功能不佳;计费优先级与理想工作流程和最佳护理实践相冲突;效率低下;以及糟糕的团队合作功能。当映射到ACGME能力时,医生的痛苦往往源于医生优先考虑基于系统的实践而不是其他期望的专业行动和行为的情况。医生们还报告了一种沉默的气氛,在这种气氛中,由于害怕报复或对问题会得到解决缺乏信心,医生不会分享问题。实际应用:医生和管理人员需要处理优先考虑系统需求的价值层次,例如EHR所要求的那些高于医生的其他期望的专业行为和行为。平衡竞争能力的重要性可能有助于解决日益增长的倦怠问题。我们还建议管理人员考虑定性匿名访谈作为一种有效的方法来发现和理解医生的痛苦,根据医生报告的沉默气氛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Professional Behavior and Value Erosion: A Qualitative Study of Physicians and the Electronic Health Record.

Goal: Occurrences of physician burnout have reached epidemic numbers, and the electronic health record (EHR) is a commonly cited cause of the distress. To enhance current understanding of the relationship between burnout and the EHR, we explored the connections between physicians' distress and the EHR.

Methods: In this qualitative study, physicians and graduate medical trainees from two healthcare organizations in California were interviewed about EHR-related distressing events and the impact on their emotions and actions. We analyzed physician responses to identify themes regarding the negative impact of the EHR on physician experience and actions. EHR "distressing events" were categorized using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Physician Professional Competencies.

Principal findings: Every participating physician reported EHR-related distress affecting professional activities. Five main themes emerged from our analysis: system blocks to patient care; poor implementation, design, and functionality of the EHR; billing priorities conflicting with ideal workflow and best-practice care; lack of efficiency; and poor teamwork function. When mapped to the ACGME competencies, physician distress frequently stemmed from situations where physicians prioritized systems-based practice above other desired professional actions and behaviors. Physicians also reported a climate of silence in which physicians would not share problems due to fear of retribution or lack of confidence that the problems would be addressed.

Practical applications: Physicians and administrators need to address the hierarchy of values that prioritizes system requirements such as those required by the EHR above physicians' other desired professional actions and behaviors. Balancing the importance of competing competencies may help to address rising burnout. We also recommend that administrators consider qualitative anonymous interviews as an effective method to uncover and understand physician distress in light of physicians' reported climate of silence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Management
Journal of Healthcare Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Management is the official journal of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Six times per year, JHM offers timely healthcare management articles that inform and guide executives, managers, educators, and researchers. JHM also contains regular columns written by experts and practitioners in the field that discuss management-related topics and industry trends. Each issue presents an interview with a leading executive.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信