Comparative study for the IMI2-NeuroDeRisk project on microelectrode arrays to derisk drug-induced seizure liability

Introduction

In the framework of the IMI2-NeuroDeRisk consortium, three in vitro electrophysiology assays were compared to improve preclinical prediction of seizure-inducing liabilities.

Methods

Two cell models, primary rat cortical neurons and human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived glutamatergic neurons co-cultured with hiPSC-derived astrocytes were tested on two different microelectrode array (MEA) platforms, Maestro Pro (Axion Biosystems) and Multiwell-MEA-System (Multi Channel Systems), in three separate laboratories. Pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) and/or picrotoxin (PTX) were included in each plate as positive (n = 3–6 wells) and ≤0.2% DMSO was used as negative controls (n = 3–12 wells). In general, concentrations in a range of 0.1–30 μM were tested, anchored, when possible, on clinically relevant exposures (unbound C_max) were tested. Activity thresholds for drug-induced changes were set at 20%. To evaluate sensitivity, specificity and predictivity of the cell models, seizurogenic responses were defined as changes in 4 or more endpoints. Concentration dependence trends were also considered.

Results

Neuronal activity of 33 compounds categorized as positive tool drugs, seizure-positive or seizure-negative compounds was evaluated. Acute drug effects (<60 min) were compared to baseline recordings. Time points < 15 min exhibited stronger, less variable responses to many of the test agents. For many compounds a reduction and cessation of neuronal activity was detected at higher test concentrations. There was not a single pattern of seizurogenic activity detected, even among tool compounds, likely due to different mechanisms of actions and/or off-target profiles. A post-hoc analysis focusing on changes indicative of neuronal excitation is presented.

Conclusion

All cell models showed good sensitivity, ranging from 70 to 86%. Specificity ranged from 40 to 70%. Compared to more conventional measurements of evoked activity in hippocampal slices, these plate-based models provide higher throughput and the potential to study subacute responses. Yet, they may be limited by the random, spontaneous nature of their network activity.